The Battalion. (College Station, Tex.) 1893-current, February 13, 1980, Image 2
|Page8 TH MONO batioi Slouch by Jim Earle Clu United Pr TRINIDAI and a wallet clues investig an apparent than 30 years Lou Girod< for the state s trict based in murder occui killer or killei If not deac L7L7 7 or persons < old, Girodo i The inves only physical ton with seve sing, a bulle and shoes — be Rudolph of Pueblo. Officials sa amateur box< P&a /3-*° “I think it’s stupid for you to order a bottle of invisible paint, but it’s double-stupid to blow up a bottle of the stuff!” Opinion No service in service stations It was quite a shock paying $1.10 a gallon for unleaded gas the other day at the neighborhood service station. And it was quite sobering to realize the price will probably go up again before the weekend. At least it wouldn’t be a surprise. But complaining about the price does nothing to lower it. The oil companies continue to make huge profits and scream that they really didn’t make that much money. Maybe the price of gas wouldn’t be so bothersome if it payed for more than the gas itself. Not too long ago, 33 cents would buy a gallon of gas and the service station attendant would put the gas in your tank, throw in a free oil check, wash your windshield and wish you a nice day. Now you get a gallon of gas for $1.10 and a smirk from the person behind the glass booth. Of course there are some service stations around that will wash your windshield and check your oil, but you have to pay about a nickel more for the gasoline. Maybe it wouldn’t hurt to pay so much if you got some service at a service station. For free. It might improve the image of the oil companies too. the small society [ by Brickman I TH&Y TALK UNLESS THE^Y Washington Star Syndicata. Inc. Z-!3 3?^. The Battalion U S P S 045 360 LETTERS POLICY letters to the editor should not exceed 3(X) words and are subject to heinf> cut to that length or less if longer. The editorial staff reserves the right to edit such lettirs and does nttt guarantee to publish any letter Each letter must he signed, show the address of the writer and lust a telephone number f<rr verification. Address correspondence to Letttrs to the Editin'. The Battalion. Room 216. Reed McDonald Building. College Station. Texas 77643. Represented nationally by National Educational Adver tising Services, Inc., New York City. Chicago and Los Angeles. The Battalion is published Monday through Fridav from September through May except during exam and holiday X'riods and the summer, when it is published on Tuesday hrough Thursday. Mail subscriptions are $16.75 per semester. $33.25 per school year; $35.00 per full year. Advertising rates furnished on retjuest. Address The Battalion. Room 216. Reed McDonald Building. College Station. Texas 77843. United Press International is entitled exclusively to the use for reproduction of all news dispatches credited to it. Rights of reproduction of all other matter herein reserved. Second-Class postage paid at College Station. TX 77843. MEMBER Texas Press Association Southwest Journalism Congress Editor Roy Bragg Associate Editor Keith Taylor News Editor Rusty Cawley Asst. News Editor Karen Cornelison Copy Editor Dillard Stone Sports Editor Tony Gallucci Focus Editor Rhonda Watters City Editor Louie Arthur Campus Editor Diane Blake Staff Writers Nancy Andersen, Tricia Brunhart, Mike Burrichter,- Angelique Copeland, Laura Cortez, Meril Edwards, Carol Hancock, Kathleen McElroy, Debbie Nelson, Richard Oliver, Tim Sager, Steve Sisney, Becky Swanson, Andy Williams Chief Photographer Lynn Blanco Photographers Lee Roy Leschper, Paul Childress, Steve Clark, Ed Cunnius Opinions expressed in The Battalion are those of the editor or of the writer of the article and are not necessarily those of the University administration or the Board of Regents. The Battalion is a non-profit, self- supporting enterprise operated by students as a university and community newspaper. Editorial policy is determined by the editor. Viewpoint local The Battalion Texas A&M University Wednesday February 13, 1980 Washington Window Campaign answer man knowsf 1 '- JL V e Wf Campu By ARNOLD SAWISLAK United Press International The Campaign Answer Man dropped by to pick up a clean shirt on his way between Iowa and New England and has consented to give us the benefit of his insights into the 1980 presidential contest to date. Question: Were you surprised by the outcome of the Iowa caucuses? Answer Man: Not in the least. lowans are a canny folk, and the Democrats among them quickly decided any politician claim ing to be concerned about the plight of “farm farmilies” and the demise of the Wabash railroad did not have their prob lems quite straight in his mind. As for the Republicans, it was strictly a case of taking a Bush in hand and giving everybody else the bird. Q: Do you believe the age issue hurt Governor Reagan? AM: Not really. After all, Reagan was able to point out that when Methuselah was his age, he hadn’t been elected to anything. Q: How about the president? Did Iowa change his campaign strategy? AM: Only slightly. Having defeated Senator Kennedy in Iowa without leaving the White House except to go to the NBC studios for “Meet The Press,” he now will campaign in New Hampshire by declining to leave the Oval Office, unless “Face The Nation” has an open date. His Florida campaign will consist of staying in the family quarters of the White House, with no exceptions except for “Issues And Answers.” By next fall, Mr. Carter will have locked himself in his closet, where he will agree to answer writ ten questions from “Our Sunday Visitor.” Q: No much has been heard of Gov. Connally’s campaign. What is his status? AM: Gov. Connally is raising funds and will not move into the delegate-winning phase of his campaign until he has $73 mil lion in his warchest. That will be no later than July 14. Q: We understand he entertained the entire Arkansas Republican leadership with a gala weekend at a posh resort. Was that a successful effort? AM: The governor got no delegates in Arkansas, but that was blamed on the weak barbecue sauce. The chef has been reas signed to another campaign job and the governor intends to go ahead with his plan The Libertar to rent Canada and entertainal;y| gccor( li n g t Q j^ s gates who are attending the lm jr d largest po National Convention in Detot|u n ited States, n Q: Ambassador Bush is thesielbut Tuesday nig servative Connecticut senatormK The Aggies for to Texas. He went into tkj« e attracted nin there, got elected acoupleofit |j a y gathering gress, but was beaten twice lotiMnudd Hite and and then hopped around in iJBjexas A&M gn government and political jobs. i »4conomics, the c quate qualification for a presi AM: Compared to what? being the son of a conservator farmer who joined the Navy, home to go into the peanut k elected to the legislature once for the governorship Mo:;ividualist,” Karr on a second try and thenannom ready to be leader of the Free I ecome more 'airs during th Karafiath saic ind his party’s idual. “A libertarian 1 ■ By JEI Camp * On March 8, rnwk v/M iviai v. 11 o, : Texas A& M Un v a seven-day U *,v D.C. The trip i ton, D.C. Exti Iji by MSG Politic W I Thr trip “give tiSee governmei Ht close to it, and it, said Debon the trip commi a chance to tab iAings than in ‘ While in the United Today is the 44th da follow. The moo new phase. The mot Jupiter and The ever and Venus Those b under the On this i In 1635, tution in A Latin Scho In 1914, New biography contradicts ide of Mondale as a lazy politician By DAVID S. BRODEB In his newly published biography of the vice-president, “Mondale: Portrait of an American Politician,” author Finaly Lewis definitively buries the widespread notion that Walter F. Mondale is a lazy politician who has been lucky enough to inherit by appointment a series of increasingly impor tant jobs. Lucky, yes; lazy no, Lewis shoes. It was by dint of hard work for his party and its leaders that Mondale made himself the plausible choice to be named attorney gen eral of Minnesota, senator from that state, and vice-president. Had he not done the scut-work of organizing and campaigning for others, over the years, Mondale might still be practicing law back in Minneapolis. In this context, what Mondale is doing for Jimmy Carter in the 1980 campaign is part of a pattern — a repeat of the chores he performed earlier for Orville Freeman and Hubert H. Humphrey. While the seques tered President remains on his pedestal, Mondale has been slogging it out on behalf of the ticket in Iowa, Maine and New Hampshire. For Mondale, the effort is an investment in both the short-term and the long-term future. Six months ago, he talked like a man who half-expected to be out of office at the end of 1980. “Ted will be tough, ” he would remark back then, speaking of his friend, Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, who has reacted with increasing irritation to Mon dale’s campaign jibes. Mondale now tells questioners that he was sure that Carter would recover in the polls as soon as he was matched “against a man and not a myth. ” But last fall, a great many Minnesota Democrats received the clear impression that Mondale expected to be coming home after the 1980 election, intent on trying to recapture his old Senate seat — just as Humphrey had done when his four years in the vice-presidency ended in defeat. But circumstances have changed drama tically since then. While Carter and Mon dale are far from cinches to be renominated and reelected, they are even farther from consignment to the political junk-heap. What becomes evident to those covering Mondale is that the vice-president is put ting himself in position to be a formidable contender for the presidency in 1984. There is no telling what the opposition might be, but it could well include the 1980 challengers, Kennedy and Gov. Edmund G. (Jerry) Brown Jr., plus any of a dozen younger Democrats who are poised on the brink of national recognition. But there is no mystery about the assets Mondale would command if he were run ning for President as the incumbent vice- president four years from now. The first would be the support of a White House and administration that have clearly learned how to exploit the political power of incum bency. There can be no doubt that Mon dale would be Jimmy Carter’s candidate to succeed himself in the presidency — with all the benefits and liabilities such support could bring. But this campaign is making it clear that Mondale has important assets of his own to apply to such an effort. Aside from his per sonal qualities that have fueled his rise, the Mondale resource most admired by Demo cratic politicians is a consistently first-rate staff headed by three of the most astute young political operators in the party — Jim Johnson, Dick Moe and Mike Berman. AH three are Minnesotans, but they are not parochial. Johnson has made himself an expert on the politics of Iowa and Illinois, and in traveling with Mondale, has built his own close working relations with leading Democrats in such other early delegate- selection states as Maine, New Hampshire and Wisconsin. Anyone who looks at the politidi der from a Mondale perspective isij by the fact by the fact that he hasap geographical and political these states, the states that comes "SL the process and that have disproprfE influence on the outcome. Is 1984 on Mondale’s mind?HisWL paign speeches are impeccably a devoted associate’s hymn ofpraOTw incumbent President. SL Mondale barely mentions himself' til the very end of his stump speed^fr' after imploring his audience at WfflL reaffirm Carter’s tenure, he liftslis47 as if signaling a benediction, andsJ'fy' you do that, you get something ebplL very excited about — you get WalK' S Mondale!” Ir It is done with a light touch that«®L the listeners to laugh as well as dies:|y anyone who thinks it’s accidentalthat^Pf' dale has figured out how to end ‘WL every speech with is own name-not® ter’s — echoing in the air, needs toWf Finlay Lewis’ book. AI This guy is lazy — or crazy—lifeil thotz (c) 1980, The Washington Postwj jl I By Doug Graham?