The Battalion. (College Station, Tex.) 1893-current, March 03, 2000, Image 9
OP IN IO N Tiday,March3,2000 THE BATTALION Page9 )ear in ad). This rate applies )r you get an additional 5 ;cheduled to end to qualify ft HELP WANTED :amp Counselors Needed For Pm loninq for dollars Allowing private companies to donate money for university research full of potential woes Ml oney is the root of all kinds of evil, even — or perhaps espe cially — in higher education. More than ever before, education is lecoming unduly influenced by eco- icmic concerns, particularly when it :omes to highly expensive research ef- brts. These days, biotechnology firms CALEB M( DANIEL Massachusetts Positions avaiiawsis ind pharmaceutical companies are fmd- getic. and fun loving students as cw ng unprecedented ways to profit from •ports, all individual sports such as Temt T r . . . from and Pool activities, and specially a discoveries made by university researchers. tg art, dance, theatre, gymnastics w, g (u | t i mate |y science will suffer if it is beholden to the y & radio. Great Salaries, room, toil . •'> ?-i7th -August-i6th Enjoy a great sm bottom line. By giving huge grants to scientists with various ITkn attached ’ com P anies are slowl y g ainin 8 lhe p° wer to e com (Girls): 1 -800-392-3752. Apply at the St Josepti fed t Center, 2601 Osier Blvd., Bryan,EC aded lot lawn maintenance company i at least 4hrs/day $6 00Air Call LOST & FOUND er black Swhite Lost Irom Autumn OS! / into, call Misti 260-6703. Reward 1 2-CD cases w/CD s. Lost near MSC,Fs I.H. 847-2243. MISCELLANEOUS iard your dog? Outside, 12x20ft jr information call 279-2833. 3. SCORE OFTEN with MYBYTESflX lay and get a free CD of cod mist n padlocks, turnout. &hay dressage an ar on premises 279-2833. MOTORCYCLE -ia Seca 600cc 1-2371. Runs perfect, deanK 00, black/yellow, DSD slip-on, 7,000* I 695-9731. PETS ioxer/pit bull mix w/kennel and siikI« se trained, playful, sweet, good walcMt 96-0422. ppies. Kittens, Cats, Dogs, zos Animal Shelter- 775-5755 Many M virtually control the research process. According to a feature report in this month's Atlantic mthly by Eyal Press and Jennifer Washburn, last year the University of California at Berkeley took heat for a deal it J/AQUATIC TECHS needed towrt? weekends. Supervises the aquatic a cts. adult pool exercise classes. Pit, 1 preferred: will consider aerobicseipwalU m pool exercise Maintains treatmsnm negotiated with biotechnology giant Novartis. In exchange for a whopping S25 million. Press and Wash- bum report that “Berkeley grants Novartis first right to nego tiate licenses on roughly a third of the [Plant and Microbial Biology] department’s discoveries — including the results of research funded by state and federal sources as well as by Novartis.” The deal also gives Novartis two out of five seats on the department's research committee which decides how the money will be spent. These kinds of alliances are not confined to the West Coast. In fact, it may not be long before Texas A&M Uni versity feels pressure to make similar deals. Genetic Savings and Clone, a new business founded and run in part by the A&M professors who cloned a prize-winning bull last year, currently claims to have a “developmental partnership” with the University. But before this partnership develops into dollar par ticipation, there are two major reasons university ad ministrators should approach industry research grants with caution. First, it is undesirable to allow' business interests to dictate research agendas. Universities are supposed to en courage free and critical thought. But if researchers' hands are in the pockets of industries, it is less likely that they will point out potential problems with commercial appli cations of science. It is much more likely that researchers will concentrate their efforts on the projects destined to garner big bucks in the economy, while allowing less profitable areas of research to languish in neglect. In large part, this is why potentially curable diseases con tinue to plague the developing world. Because these coun tries do not have the money, researchers and businesses have no inclination to pour investments into poor markets. Other problems are inevitable as long as businesses set re search agendas. Studies show that researchers themselves often hold stock in the companies that sponsor their work. Sheldon Krim- sky, a professor of public policy at Tufts University, has con ducted a study of 800 scientific papers published in several journals and found that about a third of the authors had a financial interest in the conclusions of their reports. Just last week, the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine revealed to the Associated Press that it has violat ed its own financial conflict-of-interest policy 19 times over the past three years. The Journal let doctors review drug treatments even though the doctors admitted up front they had received “major research support” from the manufactur ers of the drugs be ing reviewed. Moreover, in dustry-funded re search often in hibits the exchange of information that is crucial for scien tific advance. The free flow of data and findings is part of what allows scientists from around the world to collaborate. But when businesses fund university research, they often make propri etary claims to discoveries made on their dime. According to Press and Washburn, scientists “routinely sign agreements requiring them to keep both the methods and the results of their work secret for a certain period of time. From a company’s point of view, confidentiality may be necessary to prevent potential competitors from pilfering ideas.” Steven Rosenberg, a member of the National Cancer In stitute who is one of the nation’s leading cancer re searchers, believes these secrecy agreements are damaging to scientific progress. “One of the most basic tenets of science is that w'e share in information in an open way,” he told The Atlantic Monthly. The Journal of the American Medical Association pub lished a 1997 survey of over 2,000 university scientists that showed this basic tenet is being compromised. Nearly one in five of the respondents had delayed publication of their work for more than six months to protect proprietary secrets. Imagine a cure for cancer being discovered but kept confidential for a year while business jockeyed for the right to make the drug. And then imagine it be? ing so expensive that only the wealthiest patients could afford it. If industry is given free rein over university re search, these possibilities may not be unimaginable. As Rosenberg said, “The ethics of business and the ethics of science do not mix well. This is the real dark side of science.” Texas A&M and universities around the country must be careful to preserve disinterested inquiry as the hallmark of higher education. It is no wonder that impoverished scientists are tempted to wed their research with big money. What re searcher would not want to many a multimillionaire cor poration? But universities would do well to remember that in life, as in science, matches made in the board- room are not necessarily matches made in heaven. EMILY HARRELL/The Battalion Caleb McDaniel is d junior history major.' r sale. 29-Gallon. Great system fi. & filler. $225/060. Call 695-8138 REAL ESTATE imeroom, carport, large fenced backy! >69,500. Alford SCompany Realtors S’ 717. ROOMMATES Primaries used to promote front-nmner / Le n American history class- lals for house, CH&A,w/d,tencetUor lea*“- eS ’ S ^ UaentS mmer. $250 +util -Hjeposit. Lori 846-87S Icani of the back- room politics of lhe 19tli and ear ly 20th century in which political .machines and party bosses . summer sublease, /2bills. Call 680-0597. late needed. Nice house, $295/mo, i/2bth, garage, backyard, college neigl# 746 ASAPI! ed room @ $325/mo. +1/3bills. e 764-3106. imates for brand new 4bdrm/4bth cwvl: <4 bills. 680-1776. ranted ASAPI 2bdrm/2bth, w/d, $310/n* .eslie 680-8453. •nmate wanted. $290 tbills, W/D, !d. 260-7801. lease 1 bdrm in 2bdrm/1.5bth townW 3 bills. 260-6752. lease- $273.33 includes rent &bills ekh8884@unix.tamu.edu SERVICES GRE SCORE GUARANTEED! $lP' sional instruction. 7764-0080. efensive Driving. Lots-of-fun, Laugh-rf isal/insurance discount. M-T(6pm-8ff :l >m), Fri.&Sat- Fri(6pm-8pm) &Sat|H»" t(8am-2:30pm). Inside BankofAiwd :ome. $25/cash. Lowest price atari liv. Dr., Ste.217. 846-6117. Short (CP-0017). place to live? www.housing101.^et..T (l, pus I TRAVEL Spring Breakl! Luxury townhousesld' Red River, Angel Fire, Rio Costilla, ft :all John or Tommy 846-8916. TUTORS Tutor- Math, Biology, Chem® Statistics, Botany and more. A 1-7928. nath 142 tutor. Call Sean @ 823-0163 WEIGHT LOSS I to 30-lbs. in 30 days. 800-571-Tf« >se weight. Wanted: 43 peopleto^ 1 >r recommended, #1 in Europe with ))279-9899. or Spring Break! Metabolite 356 F Same great energy boost! suits! Free delivery in B/CS. Check!* 1 iccepted. Open 24/7 695-6983, NICHOLAS ROZNOVSKY shoose platforms and candidates. In government classes, students learn lat the political establishment went an enlightenment and re stored the power of nomination to the party membership through the intro duction of primary elections. In life as a voting adult, they learn that the Boss Tweeds of the world are in pow er once again. State primaries and caucuses are not the incredibly democratic oppor tunity for citizens to choose their par 's candidates they claim to be. In- iad, they are merely tools for securing presidential nominations be forenational conventions make them . Political parties know that only party faithfuls will show up to vote on primary or caucus day, and the primary system to place a stamp of democratic approval on tlieir appointed candidates. A prime example of this tactic is occurring right now in the “race” for the Democratic presidential nomina- . Despite the endless attention Bill Bradley has received from the media, he still has not mounted a sig nificant challenge to Vice President Al Gore. Although Bradley has led nearly every pre-election media poll and netted himself an endorsement from Michael Jordan, Gore has emerged as the winner in Delaware, Iowa and New Hampshire. Gore’s grasp of the nomination should be se cured after seventeen more states hold their primaries and caucuses on “Super Tuesday.” The party mecha nisms that have been working toward a Gore nomination since the Clin ton’s reelection in ’96 will finally have completed their mission. The nomination of an incumbent vice president has become the norm in today’s political society, so perhaps it would be better to take a look at the 1996 Republican nomination race. The GOP had no shortage of hopefuls in 1996, with a diverse field of chal lengers ranging from the ultimate Washington insider Senator Bob Dole to the ultimate D.C. outsider business man Steve Forbes. In the end however, the race for the nomination was incredibly lackluster and resulted in the inevitable nomina tion of Dole, whom most Republi cans conceded never had any chance of winning the general election. Once again, the party establishment had made their decision and only needed the populace to rubber stamp it with their approval via the primaries. This year however, the Republi can establishment is finding itself in quite a quandary. From the very outset, Texas Governor George W. Bush has been heralded by the GOP as its presidential candidate. In quick order he made minced meat of the token Republican opposi tion, dispatching Gary Bauer, Steve Forbes, Orrin Hatch, Elizabeth Dole and, for all intents and purposes, Alan Keyes. It is the last challenger to Bush’s ascension to the Republican throne which is causing him, and the GOP, an enormous headache. So far, Senator John McCain has been able to outwit the Republican Party with an incredibly novel strate gy — not counting on the party for the bulk of his support. Although Bush won contests in Iowa and South Carolina, McCain has beaten him in the open primaries held in New Hampshire, Michigan and Arizona by courting a coalition of liberal-leaning Republicans (they do exist) and dis satisfied Democrats and indepen dents. McCain has been successful so far, but the party’s primary calendar is stacked heavily against him. In a scheduling scheme which favors gi gantic, well-organized and party sup ported campaigns, McCain and Bush will battle it out for a huge chunk of the GOP delegate pool on March 7. Unable to woo the voters of each state on an individual basis, McCain’s campaign will not be able to achieve the success necessary to keep its head above water. Once more, the primary system will have weeded out the non- party approved and secured the “pop ular” nomination of the party favorite. McCain’s appeal to centrist De mocrats and independents should be a signal to the GOP establishment that a ticket with his name at the top could have a decent chance of win ning in November. The old guard would grumble about not having their poster boy to vote for, but they cer tainly would not bolt to support Gore just to spite McCain. Instead, most Republicans will ig nore the potential of the McCain can didacy and blindly follow the Bush campaign, just as the Democrats will line up behind Gore. The masses will vote their party’s candidate, not the candidate they feel would make the best president. Once again, the No vember election will be a matter of who has greater numbers, not who has the better platform. Nicholas Roznovsky is a junior political science major. lities • Sororities • Clubs • Student Groups lizadons earn $l,000-$2,000 with dtf® 1 iiscr.com three I tour Irmdraising emu. Fundraising dates ate filling quickly, ct cimpiLsfundnasier.com, (888) 923-3$ ampusfiindraiser.oom periencing the following symptoi* :iai Pain/Pressure/Tightness acial Congestion/Fullness in/Earache/i leadache/Sore Throal Cough/Bad Breath/Fever Biomedical Research is seeking 16 years of age and older to [ search study with an inve otic. If qualified, your \ it up to 24 days and you will be compensated up to $500 Student echoes feelings of being ostracized Inresponse to The Battalion’s series on issues facing African-American students. ; When I was choosing which school to at- itend after graduation, I had a variety of ftioices. I thought for months about which rone I could get the most out of. When I visit- led A&M for the first time, I fell in love with 'tie campus, the traditions and the great lamount of friendliness I perceived from the ftudent body. I left College Station knowing ithere was no other school for me. | After moving here in the fall and start ling school I realized that the wonderful I'Aggie Family” was not as warm and Invit ing to all people as it seemed. The longer I >as here and the more I talked to other MAIL CALL black students, I realized that it was not the new school or my sensitivity — it was a feeling of being an outsider. I found my self wondering if there was a place in the long line of tradition for a black person, or even if a black person would be welcomed into them. As I read The Battalion’s series on campus racism, I found myself recog nizing feelings I have felt, situations i have been in and the anger/frustration I have felt in my short time here at Texas A&M. Sadly, Rasheda James’ experience is one that is not shocking here. Obviously the views and experiences expressed in the dis cussion are more universal than some would like to admit. Talking about race is a touchy subject, which is why discussions such as the one featured in The Battalion are crucial to understanding, and hopefully diminishing some of those tensions. Maybe then the outsiders can be wel comed into the family. The first step is to begin working past our own personal hang ups and stereotypes. Once we accomplish that, true progress begins. Joseph Pleasant Class of ’03 The Battalion encourages letters to the editor. Letters must be 300 words or less and include the author’s name, class and phone number. The opinion editor reserves the right to edit letters for length, style, and accuracy. Letters may be submitted in per son at 013 Reed McDonald with a valid student ID. Letters may also be mailed to: The Battalion - Mail Call 013 Reed McDonald Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843-1111 Campus Mail: 1111 Fax: (409) 845-2647 E-mail: battletters@hotmail.com VIEW POiNTS Howdy Ags has right Crossing border for: idea, bad methods alcohol dangerous O nce again, Howdy Week and Howdy Ags have ignored good taste and a valuable tradition in favor of promoting the use of “Howdy.” In order to revive the tradition of say ing “Howdy," Howdy Ags has adopted a strategy that can only be referred to as the “super-loud, eardrum-rupturing, as- sault-on-sanity ‘Howdy.” Howdy Ags relied on many means to deliver this greeting during Howdy Week. Usually the Howdymobile “Eno- la Gay” has carried a crew of volun teers who bellow high-volume “Howdy” en masse. In addition, Howdy Ags has grouped five people with the word “Howdy” written, one letter per shirt, on their fronts. As a service to the illit erate, the group also shouts “Howdy” wherever they go. What is curious is that these attempts at reviving “Howdy” focus on the word, not the friendliness that should be behind it. Howdy Ags members cry “Howdy” and push stickers on bystanders in a very non-friendly way. “Howdy” i,s seen as a one-word tradition, not friendliness in general. “Howdy” is little more than Aggies’ unique way of being friendly. A&M is becoming less friendly as it gets bigger. The decline of “Howdy” is just one symptom of the decline of A&M’s close- knit spirit. By pushing “Howdy” down the stu dent body’s throat, Howdy Ags is trying to cure the symptom and not the disease. Even worse. Howdy Ags, via its brute- force methodology, is driving away the students who are generally friendly, but not tradition-rabid enough to say “Howdy” all the time. These students are becoming upset and unfriendly with anyone who says “Howdy” because of the juvenile actions during Howdy Week. Howdy Ags is at least displaying thoroughness by shooting itself in both feet. Actually, they need a third foot/target once the effect of annoying and turning away prospective students is considered. Howdy Ags is frill of nice people who have a good idea. They want to make A&M a friendlier place for all stu dents. However, they need to concentrate on the real tradition, not waste their time pumping, and pushing, “Howdy” at the expense of a friendlier .campus. — Chris Huffmes O fficials in many U.S. towns bor- / dering Mexico have been con- cemed for years about underage ** Americans crossing the border in Mexi- *. co to legal drink alcohol. Mexico’s drinking age is 18, a few years shy of the’- legal age for alcohol consumption in the’-T United States, and American teenagers who just cannot wait to consume alcohol in their own country find it hard to resist, the temptation of bars five minutes awayi Unfortunately, with that temptation comes responsibility — a responsibility those teens are not taking seriously. The number of fatalities and other ac cidents related to teenage consumption in Mexico have continued to increase. Cities like El Paso and San Diego are growing more and more uneasy about American teenagers who frequent Mexi can bars. Recently, a five-fatality car ac cident in El Paso drew more attention to the border. The El Paso youths involved were drinking in a Juarez club as part of a birthday celebration, and all five were killed in a wreck on their way home. All of them were under the legal drinking age for the U.S. In answer to the growing concern about accidents involving teenage drink ing on the Mexican side of the border, Patricio Martinez, the governor of Chi huahua, Mexico, where Juarez is located has offered some solutions. Martinez has proposed an amendment to ban liquor sales in Chihuahua to U.S. citizens younger than 21 years of age. If this amendment to the Mexican state’s consti tution were to be approved by state law makers, it would take effect in mid-March. Mexico’s drinking age is 18. The , United States’ drinking age is 21. Two different countries, two different laws — for good reason. American teenagers have caused an another country to at tempt to alter its laws in order to keep them in line, and that is sad in itself. Sure, Gov. Martinez has good intentions, but he should not have to change a law to keep American teens under control. . Banning liquor sales to American teenagers on the Mexican side of the * border is not enough to solve the prob lem. In fact, the answer to this problem will never be found in the U.S. or Mexi can constitutions, because the answer to this problem lies within the problem it self. Those teens who decide to drink must alsQ accept responsibility for the risks that come with that decision — and they certainly should not drive on the way home. — Melissa Johnston