TAiyiu
ld
March 29,1999
â– life
inist
^eal
Battalion
O PINION
Page 7 • Monday, March 29, 1999
ISSA JORDAN
Battalion
^f^andidates
stereotype of:
ng the pro-d
tli her lectute.
? Against Ate
1 Rudder,
y, vice preside:)
said student;
;e to see that a
lave chosen to
ipport the foj
n.
lifferent people
old,” Bailey si l*
nahue, LMrSj
Coaliiioo y
iced support,
uise for efforts
r hat do
par
ents,
cars, and
candi-
ats have in
ill
Christian
ROBBINS
that the bles:
i is bad.
dents
readier responds to
iolumnist’s opinion
mg
iot
:e after
e Final
fcnce again I visit Texas A & M where I
C Cl in j greeted by a large number of stu-
ts who attentively listen; some agree-
and some engaging in serious and re-
ctful debate when they disagree,
nd once again The Battalion falsely
landers me and my beliefs by passing
â– inaccurate and inflammatory stories,
perefore, I will, once again, clarify what I
G, Mich. (APllid and did not say and hope that this
s was sweptian pu t an end to these needless contro-
rs were all Persies.
Michigan I am accused of being “dangerous”
ast Lansing because my “intolerance” is cloaked in
h of a vjoleHlwds of love and salvation when my “ac-
isands follo"iual words” reveal “a man who hates
etball ga/ne''jverything not like him.” As evidence that
aeak such hateful words,
Manisha Parekh refers to an article on
Website in which I bemoan that “peo-
‘d, 24 witeffl do not make enough judgements
own busMlpiit right and wrong.” While she does
ested -soihot say how this is “hateful,” she fails her
hey would eadership even more by not giving the
pe to seeifwBitext of the statement,
made. , In context of the article, I was referring
ents arresiedp some people who are so “tolerant”
e MichiganMnd “non-judgmental” that they refuse to
Lansing Pdjven condemn Adolph Hitler as being an
said. filorbadman!
ite baskedj Certainly Parekh doesn’t think it “hate-
had plante|r to judge Hitler as evil does she?
back to ®The deceitfulness and deviousness of
y. But the tder opinion piece sinks even deeper
i because Wen, just two sentences later, she at-
ucal probleUWks me for telling a Jew she would
rampage mirn in hell” and that “Hitler did not go
> Spartans’ i: ar enough."
Final Four! 11 jEven though the Website that claims I
ight. aid this includes a denial that it ever
ibarrassinghappened and the article she quotes
jpset me teom my web site clearly teaches that I
;zo said S#elieve Hitler was an evil, murderous
in Sand KefBn, Parekh seems to have no bad con-
r ater Beach.Bence about passing this inflammatory
were throtetory on to her readership,
d the first â–  To do so without seeking a statement
after 10 from me, the group that sponsors me on
he game f ampus or even taking time to read our
Btten account given in past years to The
s would ; battalion takes journalistic ethics to a
e team mwew low and causes me to seriously
r,” said fdoubt her interest in truth and accuracy.
in State
sity relation 5
But is there any truth to these accusa-
Campaign fever 1999
Dose a mim-
emphasizf “i annoyance,
,, ,, they are im-
pro-tllJiant anc j are smsKsamsKrmmammmm
f c use , ^â– essities as a whole,
re pro-c 0lce, mvhii e Aggies may be a bit dis-
^Ji^Htled by the influx of colored
’’ Ul , L T e |..B ters - hire trucks, happy faces
(’ J hard hats that flood the cam-
mn ot get,.. u l during campaign season, they
i Itian F nJst applaud the candidates for
^Hfmpting to win such important
anahue sa n( t time-consuming positions,
collegiate “ Candidates, once elected, must
susceptible 30 |. f orwar( j to countless meet-
ea ot abortion s i ee pi ess nights, and constant
aid abort ritkism. A typical A&M senator
â– st sit on a senate committee,
Brplete a community service pro-
vice preside ect) research bills, speak at organi-
;er of the ^» on al meetings, be a liaison to
! Women ''•■ 1 p US organizations, schedule
instruction v-j^erous meetings with faculty
questions r. nern hers and administrators and
minist becaiEm n d the biweekly senate meeting
ent underest» t traditionally continue until the
ies to make vet , | 10ur s of the morning. These
r own bodif; lre j us t a few duties, which are
can be the ||iimal compared to the responsi-
n a necesa" tiijiies of the student body presi-
n - lent, yell leaders and other elected
ibortion is officials. In addition, all of these
and many #'®||tj es must be fulfilled while
the best opts njintaining a C average,
hat abortion5; jAt some state universities, elect-
she said ;d student leaders are paid, but at
udentsoti. Texas A&M all elected student leader po-
auraged to Jl^ifions are unpaid, so the candidates take
on rhese enormous responsibilities be-
Life i( * : yMise they want to make Aggieland a bet-
^one eteoco% place.
said. ,BiThe candidates spend up to a thou-
I theorigiriTjand dollars and many of hours cam-
rist moveraet baigning, attending meetings, networking
ig, whilespcil® planning campaign strategies in the
tion. Mies of gaining the most votes. It may
it for stiideir- seem annoying when an overly excited
to solidify “■didate sticks fliers in students’ hands
irs. Foster.fWhey rush to class, but Aggies have to
“She
to American*’
remember that basically the candidates,
from student body president to class his
torian, just want to serve their university.
Students who do not have the ambi
tion to run for a leadership position may
argue that candidates run to pad their re
sumes, but simply examining this year’s
student body president candidates dis
proves this pessimistic argument. The
majority of the candidates have more
than impressive resumes without adding
student body president to their list of ser
vice and leadership positions.
Other Aggies who probably do not
take part in organized political processes
anyway may contend that elected posi
tions have no power, so there is no point
in having elections. All anyone has to do
to see the error in this opinion is look at
the “Lupe Medina” and the “Outbound
Dining” bills, which are accomplish
ments of A&M elected students.
Texas A&M would be a better place if
more students would go out and seek
leadership positions for no other reason
than the desire to serve. All of the candi-
MAIL CALL
tion? Several years ago, when debating
the wrongness of abortion, a student ar
gued that abortion is OK if the child is un
wanted.
My answer is that we don’t kill people
because they are unwanted. Not “wanti
ng” some people is the source of numer
ous horrors throughout history. “Hitler
didn’t want the Jews,” I said, “maybe he
didn’t go far enough.”
My comment was obviously sarcastic
and my point was the opposite of how i
was represented: Hitler, abortionists and
others make a grave mistake when they
claim that any human being is “unwant
ed.”
Parekh can disagree with me all she
wants, but please have the integrity to
cast stones at me for what I really believe
and not make me out to be some mon
ster in cahoots with Hitler when you know
that is not the case.
Did I tell this Jewish student she would
“burn in hell?” Again, the context sheds
valuable light on what happened. The in
teraction went like this. An A&M student
challenged me by saying, “I’m Jewish, am
I going to burn in hell?”
“Well,” I said, “it all depends on your
relationship with Jesus. Do you accept Je
sus Christ as your Messiah and Savior?”
“Of course not, I’m Jewish.”
“I know many Jews who believe in Je
sus. Why don’t you check Him out?”
“Listen! I’m Jewish! I don’t believe in
Jesus! Just tell me, am I going to burn in
hell?”
“Well, if you won’t believe in Jesus and
you die in that state of unbelief, then it
doesn’t matter what you are, yes, you will
burn in hell.”
The important point that this student,
Parekh and all of us need to understand
is that no one goes to heaven or hell
based on their ancestry, race, culture or
even their religion.
Jesus Christ alone can forgive sins
and bring us to the Father. Apart from
Him, we die in our sins, unforgiven, and
yes, we go to hell. This is what the Bible
teaches and no desire to be politically
correct will get me to deny the clear
teaching of the Bible.
Parekh claims that “intolerance is
alive and well in America” and that it
“keeps neighbors from understanding
each other.” Despite acknowledging that
what she actually heard me say was a
message of salvation, her hatchet job on
me and the Christian message makes
me wonder whose really the intolerant
bigot.
Tom Short
Worthington, OH
Student challenges
preacher’s statements
In response to Joshua Hill’s Mar. 25
mail call.
Conscientious Christians should be
concerned with both Tom Short’s ideas
about “evolution” and Joshua Hill’s March
25th defense of Short’s remarks on the
subject. Short apparently said that “if
evolution was true, then Hitler did not go
far enough.”
Darwin’s theory of evolution states
that species evolved as their lesser mem
bers died off and the stronger ones were
left to reproduce.
Relating Hitler’s policies of extermina
tion to the theory of evolution means as
suming that people who were not mem
bers of the “master race” (Jews, blacks,
and others) were hindering the progress
of the human race.
In his attempt to apply evolution to hu
man activity, Short makes an assumption
that Hitler himself made. If being a Christ
ian is (at least partially) about spreading
the message of Christianity to others,
then Short has a special responsibility.
Because his words are going to be heard
and considered by so many, he should
avoid the types of messages that allow
others to label him as intolerant.
Daniel Lauve
Class of ’00
Legal system rules in
place for good reasons
In response to Demond Reid’s Mar. 24
opinion column.
In response to Demond Reid’s Opinion
article, I would like to present another
view. As a licensed attorney, I find that
the outlandish cases that are publicized
RUBEN DELUNA/The Battalion
dates should be commended for their
ambition and if nothing else, they should
be respected for their effort to serve their
university. Students should take a good
look at their service to their campus and
community before criticizing the elec
tions. Maybe if they put more effort to
ward service, they would have less time
to criticize those who try to make a dif
ference.
Christian Robbins is a junior speech
communications major.
in the media can lead one to the conclu
sion that money is the sole pursuit of
lawyers and their clients, and that with
enough money, one can create any loop
hole necessary to prove innocence. How
ever, state legislatures, the Congress and
the American Bar Association are working
to curtail the size of the civil financial de
cisions that are being granted by juries.
And, for every ridiculous case that is
publicized in the press, there are thou
sands of cases that never even make it
into the courtroom because a judge or an
attorney found them to be without merit.
As a former prosecutor, I understand
the frustration with the case involving the
cocaine that was seized. Many of the de
cisions that created these rules came
from officers stopping “suspicious” indi
viduals who had committed no overt crim
inal act, but were based upon the race of
the individual within the car.
The cost to the rights of untold individ
uals who are stopped without any cause
or crime is too high to allow this. Unfortu
nately the judges and attorneys who are
out there, doing their jobs with the high
est degree of integrity, are rarely deemed
newsworthy.
In closing, I would also ask you to keep
in mind that pointing out the inadequa
cies in a system is easier than finding the
solutions. If you believe that you have a
way to make the system better send in a
letter about that, or write your legislator or
congressman, or, and I know this may
scare some of you, sit down and talk with
an attorney about it.and whatever you do,
do not let him or her charge you for it ei
ther.
MacGregor Stephenson
Graduate student
The Battalion encourages letters to the editor. Letters
must be 300 words or less and include the author's
name, class and phone number.
The opinion editor reserves the right to edit letters for
length, style, and accuracy. Letters may be submitted in
person at 013 Reed McDonald with a valid student ID.
Letters may also be mailed to:
The Battalion - Mail Call
013 Reed McDonald
Texas A&M University
College Station, TX
77843-1111
Campus Mail: 1111
Fax: (409) 845-2647
E-mail: batt@tamvml.tamu.edu
Demond
REID
Campaigns, races
waste of energy
CC T Tote for
\ / me.” Once
V again, the
week following
spring break marks
the beginning of
campaign mania
across campus.
From sunup to
sundown, A&M stu
dents are bombarded
with fake smiles and empty promises
from ambitious Aggies looking to pad
the “extra-curricular activities” section
of their resumes. Despite the obvious
enthusiasm showed by all those in
volved, it is quite apparent that the ma
jority of the Spring 1999 campaigns
suck more than a Hoover vacuum pow
ered by a diesel engine.
From the student body president race
all the way down to the election of the
campus dog catcher, it is no secret that
all this campaigning is more annoying
than jock itch.
For example, a good portion of the
student body president candidates are
taking their campaigns a little too seri
ously. These are the candidates whose
supporters pounce on unsuspecting
pedestrians and swamp those pedestri
ans with an absurd amount of fliers.
And the fliers never say anything
simple like “Vote for Joe Blow.” The
fliers are like autobiographical mani
festos with entirely too much informa
tion about the candidate. No one cares
that Joe Blow won the 1983 second
grade remedial spelling bee or that he
was once president of the Vanilla Ice
Fan Club.
Is it too much to ask to be able to
walk around campus without being
mauled by someone in tights and a
cape, resembling some sort of out-of-
work comic book hero? What makes the
situation worse is that Super Dork’s
only comment about the person he is
endorsing is that the candidate is a “re
ally good guy.”
“He is a really good guy” is not
something a person says to endorse a
candidate; it is something a person says
at their brother’s parole hearing.
To all the people walking around
with the yellow plastic hard hats, stop
it. Believe it or not, the yellow hard hat
people actually look dumber than Super
Dork. At least Super Dork looks silly
enough to get a laugh, while the yellow
hard hat people just look silly.
Candidates waste voters’ time by pre
senting platforms because student gov
ernment has no real power. Yeah, Joe
Blow might actually have a good plat
form idea, but once he is elected he will
not have any power to carry that idea
out. There will be an all-white starting
five for the Harlem Globetrotters before
any of Joe Blow’s platform ideas get im
plemented.
It does not matter who gets elected
as student body president because all
the candidates will do the same equally
pathetic things. Whatever this Universi
ty is going to do, it will do it regardless
of who the student body president is.
Koko the gorilla could get voted into of
fice and things still would run the same
way.
The big issue among the student body
president candidates is diversity and mul-
ticulturalism. Now, isn’t that the pot call
ing the kettle white? With most of the
presidential candidates, their idea of mul-
ticulturalism is watching two Spike Lee
movies in the same week.
Also, a lot of the campaigning is un
necessary. There is actually a person
putting up fliers to run for historian.
Why? That is a senseless waste of a
tree. If by some minor miracle more
than one person wants to be the histori
an, let them. Being the historian is not a
privilege. On the top-100 elected posi
tion preference list, historian ranks
slightly above campus pooper scooper.
Voting for yell leader is a waste of an
election. It would be better to have
some sort of fundraising contest for a
charity than have an election for yell
leader. The yell leader race has been re
duced to who can be the biggest fool
and the competition is pretty stiff this
year. It does not take much talent to
prance around in front of a crowd like
some sort of disgruntled postal worker
in a Good Humor Man uniform scream
ing “Beat the hell out of” that week’s ri
val opponent.
Anyone considering a campaign for
next year should take into consideration
the mistakes of this year’s campaigns. It is
not necessary to annoy the voting public or
be a complete idiot. To run a successful
campaign it is important to remember two
key words that the A&M voting public will
respond to: free alcohol.
Demond Reid is a sophomore
journalism major.