u
s«
Battalion
niej
^The choice of a new generation?
tings ^chool voucher
Page 9 • Tuesday, March 23, 1999
Wt good idea
RK (AP) .
ame s, CBS
'^ e *s man,
education
11 ad a 6.0 o'M
d ] 3 sharf.Hn he0c,u
tfro mlas!!« 1)0,5
k we cav s\'stem in
1 in theRn:1M [, nii ed
5, CBS' 'â–  ta | cs is i' 1
rogramminsF need of
tell the stmP pi0venKM11
strength nd -mn P no
y had any: e 10 ievo 10
some blow ^ ' ' ain lH ’
Brandon
MULLEN
happen tha!|h llc V n u
7 g ch( ol vouchers,
tour F^fBchool vouchers would give
/ , i re S lc tarpnts the money to choose
1 l ’ ,u ■ v ; vhether their children go to public
chpol or private school,
t ie tour ^-j&rhe argument in favor of a
1 ' s ’ 1116 ’ouchers system rests on the theo-
game post' y a iat vouchers would improve
1 !rorn ^ he current education system by
e Temple: nipioving learning, increasing the
nt highe (ptjons for poor families and creat-
de 1 slant ng a system of “parent’s choice.”
itate receiver These benefits exist only in the-
it from Cor.: , r y j n reality, school vouchers
ia. vould further damage an already
.veekend P veak education system.
Michiga" ' frhe National Education Associ-
tchup, wr ition (NEA) is a major opponent to
vn 12 peri- he voucher system and cites a
uucky thnll'iumber of reasons and examples
is the pet vhy vouchers would fail,
lolds in the Ipne reason is vouchers would
uogram, ahot improve the education stu
nts 994,000 : lents receive. The NEA used Mil-
s the pertvaukee. Wise., to support their ar-
igram amogument. Milwaukee has been
i at the tirnhsing a voucher system for the past
;ix years.
: Research has shown that during
| daat period there has not been any
Cl J Ithlnge in the academic level of
Indents using the vouchers in
Ltpmparison to students in the pub-
V] school system.
1 ‘ Not only does a voucher system
. FIs. help students, it widens the ed-
ano(hers!rongv£ t j on .g a p t i iat a i reac iy exists. As the
troit, and fc/\ p U t n, “Vouchers would help the
id three hits, at p ie expense of the many and take
s, astheTige®j er j ca i3 ac k to the days of separate and
;ors 3-2 Moni JrH ,q ua i_”
who led tl ie »;vidence of this effect can be seen in
he education systems of Great Britain,
hile and the Netherlands. According to
NEA, the voucher system in these
ntries has “widened the educational
between the children of the well-off
II the children of the poor.”
lAfter many years of working to level
he educational playing field, it would
tot be reasonable to institute a system
hat would work against this progress.
iree striked
And a voucher system in the U.S.
would hurt the students who need the
most help.
Despite the claims of “parent’s
choice,” the ultimate choice belongs to
the admissions department of the private
schools.
NEA President Bob Chase said, “No
voucher system guarantees that every
child who applies will be selected to at
tend the private school.”
It is unreasonable to expect presti
gious private schools to admit students
who do not fit their status quo.
Private religious schools already reject
two-thirds of their applicants. The NEA
states that “the ablest, easiest to educate
students would use vouchers to attend
private school. More difficult and expen
sive to educate children would be left in
public school with even fewer advocates
and resources.”
In addition to admissions criteria.
Chase also said, “No voucher system
covers total tuition costs.”
Those students who are below the
poverty line would still not be able to af
ford a private education. Therefore most
of the vouchers would be used by stu
dents who currently attend private
schools.
The NEA estimates “ [it] would cost
$5.2 billion a year in additional tax
spending to provide vouchers for the stu
dents already in private schools.”
This twisted Robin Hood system that
gives back to the rich is un-American.
The additional tax money should be fo
cused on improving the education of
those students who are forced to accept
public schooling.
School vouchers should not even be
an issue. The American public has re
peatedly voted vouchers system down
across the country. And the two current
systems in Milwaukee and Cleveland
were passed by the state legislature, not
by the public.
Ultimately the education system in the
United States needs to be over-hauled.
The current system does not provide the
GABRIEL RUENES/The Battalion
level of academic excellence that should
be expected. It also has no way to guar
antee that schools in one state are com
petitive with schools in another. So a stu
dent’s education in Paducah, Ken. may
not be equal to a student’s in Plano, Tex.
But those who believe a voucher sys
tem would help are mistaken. A voucher
system in the United States would only
intensify the current problems. It would
not improve education. It would not pro
vide opportunities. It would only benefit
the students who do not need any assis
tance.
Brandon Mullen is a senior history and
English major.
in his four;'
gave up
ts in five ins
, who apps
starting,
i the first and:
nson’s
ilez singled
lore and
-1 lead in S|
scored twice
eat industry, USDA should Kazan’s award will not erase
‘maintain stricter sanitary rules pain, rift caused in Hollywood
r
A
FOOX
little
girl lies
i doubled ** -*-on a
lotto and :>ed ’ weak
fice fly dR lirid hred. She
nth the ge^nnot stop
Reed helr^rowing up.
for three irJfir stomach
lyan pitefehn ts, and her L ISA
st save, ^tily can
} nly watch as
>ht swiftly wastes away in front
L * J )f |h e ir eyes.
liirvURDoes she have AIDS or can-
TNo, the disease is a much
C0(L 11Ore i ns i d i° us one an d it is car-
^ ifld by the food American soci-
’, Iowa (riity is consuming. It is E-coli poi-
vas hired Toning.
Iowa’s bast®t he meat industry and its co-
after poi ts - the poultry and fish in-
Missouri lustries - need to clean up their
s best shOHlis and clean up Americans’
lament, ood.
r Indiana [While one little girl dying is a
)avis, whof'ragedy, few people might really
newed. ale note. However, when the
ord of dHgures in question become larg-
most viewer, the question becomes more
wa history’ erious.
the Hawkk bn Spoiled: What is Happen-
e Univek ng to Our Food Supply and Why
tgham #V<| are Increasingly at Risk, the
cansas in Author, Nicols Fox, notes that be-
a 78-68 wpen 200 and 500 people die
the NCA^ very year from E-coli poisoning
als lastThklone. Most of these people are
iwa is Children.
took his »E-coli is a nasty disease that,
So 1), l pome instances, attacks the
a No. l.- topy, ravages it and is capable of
sity of W>; ating away a person’s heart,
jty of Te^BBut it is not the only food-
to toP' 1 ' â– 
borne illness that exists. There
are a variety, including salmo
nella and mad cows’ disease.
Most of these diseases flour
ish due to a combination of
dirty, diseased animals being
sold to slaughterhouses, the
meat not being cooked properly
and the efficient but unsanitary
conditions that exist in the food
industries, Fox said.
The conditions that lead to
people dying from these diseases
are not difficult to find or hard to
imagine. For instance:
An animal gets sick, but in
stead of being killed, the animal
gets sold as food for the un
knowing masses.
“Consumers are
endangering their
lives when they go
out to eat and they
should take precau
tions/'
The conditions in the slaugh
terhouses are hardly pure and
sanitary, despite check-ups by
the United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA).
Perhaps it is wise to ask how
a government agency could al
low the unsanitary conditions
that lead to death to continue in
the food industries.
Robin Cook, a graduate of Co
lumbia University Medical
School and a fiction writer,
claimed the USDA and the meat
packing industry are allies in the
struggle to keep the public un
aware.
He said that the USDA offi
cials overlook many of the dis
gusting things that happen to the
meat on the way to the food
market.
The meat could be dropped
on the floor amidst the blood
and other body fluids from the
cows and steers. It could be dis
eased to start with, something
officials are supposed to inspect,
but perhaps overlook.
Regardless, it is obvious that
the USDA needs to take stronger
action. In the mean time, con
sumers are endangering their
lives when they go out to eat
and they should take precau
tions.
Some might choose not to or
der meat at all when dining at
restaurants. A less drastic mea
sure might be to make sure the
food is cooked properly and is
not served cold, which should
eliminate some of the risk.
But more importantly, some
thing needs to be done to stop
these murders. For these deaths
are deaths — people dying due
to the carelessness and greed of
others. Society needs to be more
aware of the little girl, lying on
her bed, swiftly dying.
Lisa Foox is a senior
journalism major.
CC T thou § ht
I the
X black
list was Hattie
McDaniel and
me. ” Whoopi
Goldberg’s
quip may have
garnered a few Aaron
laughs at Sun- MEIER
day’s Oscar ■*■■*^*■1*
ceremony, but the story behind
the joke is no laughing matter.
The honorary Oscar presenta
tion is usually a time for audi
ences to head to the bathroom or
raid the refrigerator before the
announcement of Best Picture.
This year, however, the biggest
question was not “Shakespeare
or Private Ryan?” it was “Will
they or won’t they applaud for
Elia Kazan?”
Kazan, director of such cine
matic wonders as On the Water
front and Streetcar Named
Desire, was selected by the Acad
emy to receive an honorary Os
car for lifetime achievement.
The trouble is in the ’50s,
Kazan “named names” to the
House on Unamerican Activities
Committee (HUAC) chaired by
the infamous Sen. Joe McCarthy.
The Academy has handed its
highest honor to a coward and
thereby soiled the award’s in
tegrity.
Kazan is the Linda Tfipp of
the Cold War era — a person
who sold out friends and col
leagues for the sake of patrio
tism. With the clear liberal ten
dencies of the movie industry.
Kazan naming names was like
shooting fish in a barrel.
Whether or not the people
Kazan identified as members of
the Communist Party truly were
communists has never been the
issue. Simply being named by a
person who testified in front of
HUAC ended the careers of many
of Hollywood’s top creative
minds.
In Kazan’s attempt to save the
country from what many be
lieved was an international com
munist conspiracy, he sold out
one of the basic principles of this
country and the artistic commu
nity as a whole: the freedom of
thought.
Whether communism was
bent on global domination is not
the issue. The idea that promis
ing careers could be ended just
because one man suspected an
other of communist leanings is a
travesty to the justice system of
this country.
Guilty by Suspicion is more
than a phrase to describe the Mc
Carthy era. It is also a movie star
ring Robert DeNiro, one of the
presenters of the honorary Oscar
to Kazan. The movie depicts
DeNiro’s character facing charges
of communist association.
Even though DeNiro is a
friend of Kazan and owes much
of his early beginnings to the di
rector, how easily DeNiro aban
doned the ideals extolled in the
film.
The other presenter of the Os
car, Martin Scorsesee, director of
such films as Raging Bull and
Good Fellas, also followed the
path of hypocracy DeNiro walks.
Scorsesee is a rabid proponent of
the exiled Dali Lama of Tibet.
The Lama was forced out of Ti
bet by the Chinese government
because his Buddhist beliefs did
not comply with the communist
government, a story eerily remi
niscent of McCarthy-era politics
where communist beliefs no in
line with the American govern
ment were forced out of their
jobs.
During Sunday’s telecast of
the Oscars, the camera intention
ally showed images of stars such
as Ed Harris and Nick Nolte sit
ting with their arms folded
across their chests staring at
Kazan in defiance, while other
stars such as Helen Hunt tried to
offer the director a standing ova
tion. However, no matter what
the people at the Dorothy Chan
dler Pavilion may have tried to
do, whether it be an organize
silent or a verbal protest, it will
not make up for the lives Kazan
ruined.
The blacklisted men and
women had their lives taken
away from them and most were
never able to recover. So while
Kazan stood bn stage accepting
an award, people whose lives he
had ruined know that they have
been slapped in the face twice,
once by Kazan and another time
by the members of the Academy
who gave the Oscar to a coward.
Aaron Meier is a senior
political science major.