Thursday
ighhnrht iursda y • A P ril
•ombiiii
2, 1998
°^ e * n the roof ands(
orch on fire.
I hat afternoon,
11 as police chief,
)fi VVasserman
plosive in a brown, ,
walkway leading!,
10r -1 ( was safely disat,
Sunday evening,
'mbs stuffed into a t:
iped through a neut ^
A l / -year-old girl tv2il|
'time and escaped;;
On Monday eveni:|-
log on a phone tip iojL
tnb hidden in crawls,
use under construe!!
I he bomb squadt
ed it.
I fie last bomb we
kpack left hangit,
n's water tower.Thi
damaged.
TUDENT LIFE
ixr pal Al
Vith Gore as only alternative to Clinton, impeachment seems bad idea
j
Stewart
Patton
columnist
ust
when
it ap
peared that
Clinton had
sidestepped
yet another
controversy,
the latest al
legations by
Katherine
Willey have
thrust the
president’s
sex life back into the spotlight.
Many scandal-weary Ameri
cans are even renewing the pos
sibility of impeachment only
one-and-a- half years from the
end of Clinton’s term.
Before we “kick the bum
out,” however, we should seri
ously examine the bum that we
would kick in. Do we really
want Al Gore to be president?
Political cartoonists have
long found fodder in the fact
that vice presidents really don’t
do anything.
Except for the power to preside
over the Senate, the framers of the
Constitution essentially granted
no other power to the vice-presi
dent than to be “lady in waiting”
for a presidential vacancy.
Vice presidents typically play
Ginger Rogers to the president’s
Fred Astaire: helping the presi
dent dance gracefully even if a
few toes get stepped on.
Much like Craig Kilborn on the
“Daily Show”, the president is out
there “to look good,” and a good
vice president can be as helpful
as a hair stylist or makeup artist.
Gore says on his Website that
one of the tasks he is “particu
larly proud to perform” is intro
ducing President Clinton. If in
troducing someone is sufficient
presidential preparation, then
Ed McMahon would be the per
fect presidential replacement.
Gore also likes to dance on
both sides of an issue, depend
ing on to whom he is speaking.
In a speech to tobacco growers,
Gore related his personal experi
ence growing tobacco: “I fertilized
it. I planted it. I harvest it. I cut it.”
In a separate speech, he re
called that his own sister had died
of lung cancer from smoking.
Gore emotionally related the
heartache he felt over this un
timely death and the turmoil it
created in his family.
Here’s the rub: Gore was en
raged about the evils of tobac
co, yet he continued to accept
huge contributions from the
major tobacco lobbies for six
years after his sister’s death.
Gore is simultaneously in bed
with Joe Camel and Johnny
Health while pulling the wool
over Joe Q. Public’s eyes.
Perhaps the one issue that really
defines Gore is the environment.
According to one commenta
tor, “Gore is a bona fide tree-
hugging, spotted owl-loving,
radical doomsday prophet who
carries water for Greenpeace,
the Sierra Club, and every other
environmental fringe lobby.”
In his 1992 book, Earth in the
Balance, Gore waxes apocalyp
tic as he explains that the envi
ronment is the most important
issue of our time.
Gore speaks of the earth in
spiritual terms and with a rever
ence unequaled even by priests’
adoration for the Virgin Mary.
Gore wants to reinvent how
government regulates pollution by
bringing together scientists, inter
est groups, businesses and federal
agencies to issue “report cards” on
forests, wetlands and fisheries.
Sounds expensive, doesn’t it?
Programs such as these are
what earned Gore the National
Taxpayer’s Union ‘s rating as the
biggest spender in 1990.
Since Dan Quayle misspelled
“potato” in a mock-up of a
spelling bee, the media seems
to harp on every little mistake a
vice president makes. Whether
vice presidents really are stupid
or the media is overly critical,
again Gore fits the bill.
Joe and Dolores Delgadillo of
Dallas, Tex. wrote a letter to the
vice president asking him to save
the Texas Eagle train, part of the
government-owned and finan
cially troubled Amtrak system.
The couple explained that
they used the train to visit their
children in Chicago and on
both coasts.
“Thank you for your letter re
garding the protection of the
T share your
Texas Eagle,”
Gore replied,
view that the urgent problem of
species extinction and the con
servation of biological diversity
should be addressed ... I look
forward to working with you for
the future of our planet.”
In a recent speech, Gore out
lined his plan for reinventing the
IRS to make it more user-friendly.
Gore again displayed his
mental acuity before a national
audience by stating that “many
of these recommendations are
already in place.”
Well guess what, Gore, you
cannot “recommend” a policy
that is currently being prac
ticed. If Gore were to visit Col
lege Station, he would probably
“recommend” that A&M affili
ate with a law school, or that
PTTS become the most hated
acronym on campus through
ruthless ticketing.
Al Gore is fond of reinvent
ing, recommending, ranting
and raving, and he could be the
next president of the United
States of America.
If Gore has his way, by 2001
your backyard might be consid
ered a wetland in need of protec
tion, and your car might be cruci
fied for destroying Mother Earth.
When considering the alternative,
a little presidential touchy-feely
doesn’t seem so bad after all.
Stewart Patton is a junior
sociology major.
(nited States should repay
ebts to United Nations
Volunteer work exploited at Big Event
Caleb
McDaniel
columnist
ours
fO-6
2-6
he time has
come to be
—. honest with
mrselves. The Unit-
BStates is a sorry
nember of the Unit-
â– Nations.
pPerhaps it was
iasy to overlook the
â– ny of American
fesponsibility as
Incle Sam barked
demnations at
dam Hussein for
grim disparity between “what he
s” and “what he does.”
But now that the latest Iraqi crisis has
sided, it is high time to realize the Unit-
d States is just as guilty of breaking its
iromises to the United Nations.
Had you not heard? Our distinguished
ivernment is the most notorious debtor
the United Nations.
Years of neglecting to pay our dues for
tembership in the organization have tal-
d an IOU to the tune of $1.3 billion.
While our Capitol Hill representatives
||lebrate budget surpluses and pat each
other on the backs, Kofi Annan has come
looking for his paycheck.
B The secretary-general of the United
[ations has made it clear in a press re-
ase that the organization survives “only
cause other countries in essence pro-
ide interest-free loans to cover largely
merican-created shortfalls.”
In 1998, the amount owed to the
United Nations by the United States is
expected to climb to $1.7 billion faster
than you can say “Monica Lewinsky.”
President Clinton has more than one
thing to be embarrassed about.
While self-righteously scolding the
delinquents of the world, President Clin
ton forgets to mention the shameful fail
ure of the United States to feed Annan’s
beast of burden.
1 Instead of paying the money that we
we, we only require more of Annan and
is organization.
Our insistence that his diplomatic ef-
rts in Baghdad adhere to our demands
ave drowned out his own insistence that
e United States should pay its dues.
Apparently believing the moral high
found excuses the ignorance of our fi-
ancial obligations, we are content to take
redit for the successes of the United Na-
ons without paying off our climbing
redit bill.
The result? While bossing the United
Nations around in the Middle East, de
veloping nations like Pakistan and Fiji
(yes, Fiji) are picking up the slack left by
our financial profligacy.
Suddenly the moral high ground does
not look so high.
Like the gentleman that he is, Annan
waited patiently until after he saved the
world from war and brokered an eleventh-
hour peace bid with a mustached mad
man to point out this hypocrisy. Certainly
he deserves our attention now.
Lord knows it has been hard for Annan
to get our attention in the past. “The pub
lic becomes aware of United Nations con
tributions to conflict resolution only occa
sionally,” wrote Annan, “when a crisis
erupts that thrusts us onto television
screens and into newspaper headlines.”
A billion-dollar debt is apparently not
flashy enough for the public eye.
But it should be.
It is almost too embarrassing to point
out that we judge Saddam “not by what
he says, but what he does,” while our du
plicitous debt betrays our owtl infidelity
to our promises.
The silence on the issue from Washing
ton is eerie. During Annan’s recent visit
with President Clinton, the leaders re
mained oddly quiet about the subject.
And last month, yet another bill that at
tempted to correct the debt was killed in
Congress because controversial rider bills
nailed it to the table. Tsk tsk.
Honestly almost always wounds pride.
And in this case, it is no different.
It is hard to face the facts of our failings,
and harder still to correct them.
But correct them we must. Until we
do, we would be wise to pipe down
about the faults of the United Nations
and its members.
While rattling our sabers in the Gulf,
perhaps we should remember the quieter
wisdom of a much more virtuous Middle
Easterner from two millennia ago. “Why
do you look at the speck in your brother’s
eye,” he might ask us today, “but do not
consider the plank in your own eye? Or
how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me
remove the speck out of your eye’; and
look, a plank is in your own eye?”
Saddam may not be our brother, and
the threat of biological weapons is certain
ly not a speck, but a $1.3 billion debt is a
pretty big plank, America. In the future,
pay up before putting down.
Caleb McDaniel is a jreshman
history major.
Aaron
Meier
columnist
T he sky is brightening to a gentle
azure blue, the sun is creeping
higher in the sky everyday and the
warm weather offers the opportunity for
wide-eyed, idealistic Aggies to once
again be exploited by the Bryan-College
Station community in an event more
commonly known as Big Event.
At Fish Camp, freshmen are indoctri
nated with the notion that Big Event is
one of the many “New Army” traditions
in which all good Ags participate. New
Army loosely translated means, “We are
going to organize some events to fix the
stereotypical image of Aggies as a herd of beer-guzzling ax-
wielding morons.”
High school graduates accustomed to donating their time
and energy to charitable causes come to this university and
devour the ideal of Big Event, picturin g thousands of young
students assaulting the community doing good deeds from
painting an elderly woman’s house to building picnic bench
es in Central Park.
However, as Dorothy learned in the Emerald City, reality
seldom measures up to the idealized world.
Last year was my third and final Big Slave Drive. My previ
ous two Big Slave Drive experiences were spent performing
the arguably worthwhile project of clearing bamboo from
Hensel Park. Last year however, the little man behind the cur
tain of Big Slave Drive was revealed.
My group had the honor of being slaves for the day at a
house that would make Bob Vila proud.
Our tasks included such lackluster projects as painting,
weeding flower beds, washing a flagstone walkway and the
coupe de gras cleaning out the fireplace all under the watch
ful eye of our owner for the day who pointed out any speck of
soot left behind.
All the while, the young teenage prince of the family sat
perched on his throne watching “Saved By the Bell: The
New Class.”
Oh wait, I forgot when he dropped the can of paint on the
ground and threw me a paintbrush, so he did next to nothing,
not absolutely nothing.
Initially I had hoped this was an isolated case where the
selection process of the Big Event wizards had gone wrong.
When I shared my story however, I discovered other cases
where totally capable, well-off families were benefiting from a
event so red ass, it starts with a yell practice.
“Beat the hell outta Big Event??” Get real.
After picking the brain of a former wizard in the Big Event
committee, he came up with the excuse that the Big Slave
Drive is meant to benefit the entire community, not just the
elderly and the poor.
How does me playing Cinderella for a day to an adopted
evil wicked stepmother and brother benefit the entire com
munity? After a year of wracking my brain I do not see how
ensuring a woman’s manicure remains intact until her weekly
fill helps the community.
According to the University’s homepage, over 3,000 stu
dents participated in Big Event last year. That makes 6,000
hands (yes journalists can multiply) that could do more than
simply paint the fence of a family who is too stingy to hire a
professional painter.
Admittedly, the majority of the projects probably benefits
the community at large, but such abuses of the Big Event in
dicate a need for a change in the Big Event philosophy.
The adjective “big” implies an event of some import,
where something of true worth is accomplished. “Big” does
not connote a bunch of tiny little chores some adolescent is
too lazy to do himself.
Last semester with far fewer hands, Habitat for Humanity
built two homes for two sisters. With the manpower Big Event
attracts, the construction on Texas Ave. could be finished, a
good chunk of University Dr. could be knocked out, a decent
pizza place could be built and we might even be able to take a
nice nap if we finish early.
Instead, the wizards behind the Big Event have us running
around cutting grass with butter knives and alphabetizing
Martha Stewart’s recipe cards.
Aaron Meier is a senior political science major.