The Battalion. (College Station, Tex.) 1893-current, March 21, 1997, Image 9
A The Battalion Page 9 Friday • March 21, 1997 Big Event needs repairs lervice project has good intentions, lacks organization Columnist r he Big Event is a highlight the spring pester. An rgie tradi- bn, this com- bnity-wide Wice project [away to say tank you” to fyan/College ption. |Participa- m in The Big Event has en exceptional the st few years.This pro- :t is a great way for stu nts to have fun while ing something for oth- s. However, a common isconception about ic Big Event is the idea is primarily to help the >s fortunate. Brooke Hybarger, a se- or accounting major id director of The Big r ent, said, “We want :ople to know Big Event not just for the needy, is a way to say “thank |)u” to everyone in the Bi\an/College Station fcmmunity." In fact, Big Ivent is not really de igned to help those who |:e truly in need, but more to be a day of small-scale service. This loints to a need for a lew operation of Big I vent proportions, to I elp the truly needy. I For an operation its I ize, The Big Event runs Imoothly. Hybarger said 1 of 450 to 500 jobs, there |tre onty about 20 prob- ms, and those are mi- o/. ’TAeproblems that iccnr during The Big ivent are usually due to lor preparation on the of participating or- Courtney Phillips Junior psychology major I ganizations and the people who request services. Those who re quest services fill out a detailed de scription of the services needed. They are made fully aware that the job needs to be manageable in five to six hours. They also are encouraged to provide supplies. Those who cannot afford this are given supplies, but these are not always adequate. Therefore, sit uations arise where peo ple request their houses be painted, but do not arrange for it to be scraped, do not have the money to buy supplies, and do not own a lad der. Thus, the students are instructed to paint a peeling house in six hours with no ladder and little paint. An incomplete job from which no one really benefits is the ensuing result. Student organi zations also need to take more responsi bility when they par ticipate in The Big Event. Organizations are asked to send representatives to one of two Big Event meetings, where they find out the phone number of the person they are helping and are asked to contact them to find out the de tails of the job. They also are asked to con tact the Big Event staff if any needs or problems arise. If students are sure to do this, situations like the one previously described are less likely to occur. The Big Event does little to help the people whose homes need major repairs but who can not provide adequate supplies. The Big Event serves its function well in providing small services to people who have a need for a few hours of student manpower. However, there is a need for an organization to step up and concen trate on helping the peo ple that Big Event, by its nature, is not equipped to help. Most of these peo ple have big needs which cannot be remedied with the one day and limited y- ; k To HELP w m. K, V js: resources The Big Event has to offer. Perhaps these people sign up for aid out of igno rance of The Big Event’s true function or just des peration, but there must be a better way to help them. An event like this would have to start out as less than big, but it could grow. By slowly taking on jobs it had the resources to han dle, this new event could be a three-day or week long event that really would allow students to get their hands • dirty by helping others who need it desperately. The Big Event doesn’t put on a pretense of being primarily to help the needy, and it doesn’t function best in that ca pacity. Students, however, often have misconcep tions of it as a quick and painless way to help less for tunate individuals. Students should real ize The Big Event’s true function and continue to pour their efforts and ener gies into the tradition. How ever, there also is a need out there for service to those in more dire need. Perhaps one of the amateur politicians so abundant on our campus these days will take this up as his ffj or her cause and see it to fruition. Senate application bill lacks focus, reason C ollege is a tremen dous responsibility. From maintaining study habits to finding time to buy groceries, students are constantly on the go, with hardly a spare moment to call their own. There are pres sures from so many di rections that students are pushed to outstanding limits. It’s amazing how many burdens students can bear and still be able to stand upright. Of course, once college stratum is established, students are con fronted with the prospect of gradu ation and graduate school. A desire to earn some money after investing tons in college motivates students to push harder into the depths of debt and near-death. Numerous ul cers and close brushes with ner vous breakdowns soon become everyday events. The tasks I have mentioned seem cut out for superheroes like Superman or Batman, but in reality, the average college student over comes several obstacles much like those designed for such characters. It’s absurd the Senate is now ready to bestow the gift of higher educa tion in a carefree manner to anyone willing to accept. Our forever-responsible Texas Senate has taken action to increase access to higher education, or so they think. The Senate has passed a college admissions bill for unifomi applications and one-stop filing at Texas university systems. Their intent is pure of motive, but the focus is slightly off-balance. By introducing the goodwill gesture, the Senate is opening more doors to ap plicants who are most likely not ready to cross that threshold. The Senate fails to recognize col lege may be too much for some ap plicants. Granted, college is an out standing and exciting eye-opening experience, but not everyone is meant to go. It’s hard enough for stu dents who actually want to be in col lege and aren’t able, but it’s even Columnist Kate Shropshire Freshman biomedical science major more difficult for those forced to compete with students who don’t care about education. The bill may lead to a tendency to accept ap plicants who don’t know how to handle the sud den call for self-restraint and self-discipline. Therefore, disadvanta geous results are induced for both the student and the system. Gary Engelgau, exec utive director of admissions and records at Texas A&M, said the bill may not be as much assistance to applicants as they think. “When you look at the Texas pop ulation as a whole, it may help (the applicants), but when looking at ap plicants at A&M, it may not help be cause chances are very high that the applicant will have to present addi tional information.” Engelgau also emphasized the tougher and more pressing issue of immature students entering the Uni versity system and its repercussions. “The largest problem is students who are not prepared for the colle giate level and cost both the state and the individual a lot of money,” he said. “The level of preparation of the student is the first concern.” Although cost is the main con cern in Engelgau’s eyes, it remains a neglected topic with the Texas Sen ate. With benevolence goggles strapped tight, the Senate omits a bigger and brighter option to boost the availability of a college educa tion: lower college costs. The prob lem with admittance to Texas univer sities lies not so much in the actual admissions process, but in paying for college. Many students who want to be in school can’t because of cost. They suffer more than those stu dents who just can’t get in because of a minor difficulty factor. In essence, the Texas Senate is not making it any easier to receive a col lege education. They are making it more difficult by attacking the prob lem from the wrong angle and utiliz ing the wrong weapons. A&M students take education, opportunities for granted Columnist nyone with open ears on this campus can have them filled with stories of how life isn’t fair, tad although many students tnay know what the word gratitude” means, its prac tice is now a foreign concept. One of the foundations of iny education at Texas A&M ja* hould be a broader per- sd pective of life, one empha- rid izing thankfulness. W The first privilege stu- ients enjoy blindly is stu- oii lenthood. Although the worth of a col- $ age education fluctuates, the college j, taduate still makes a better living than he person who ended their education thigh school. According to the Office of Educa- onal Research and Improvement, the Innual income for people with college ducations rises more rapidly than Joshua Hill Sophomore English major those of others. In the 80’s for example, the income of the av erage college educated male rose 78 percent, compared to 37 percent for those who only finished high school. . In the 1989-90 year, 72 per cent of employed college grad uates had jobs in professional, managerial and technical ar eas. Deserved or not, an Aggie ring brings respect in the world and opens doors locked to the majority of Americans. Considering the opportuni ty for education offered them, students should be grateful for and take advan tage of their classes. As anyone who has traveled knows, United States citizenship is a gift to be treasured. Toilets, clean water, and at least two meals a day are taken for granted in American society. The campus got a small taste of life in many foreign countries a few weeks ago when the electricity in the resi dence halls failed several times. Matt Listi, sophomore genetics ma jor and Hart Hall resident, said he would not have been happy if he need ed to study on that occasion. “We [residents] just come to expect certain things all the time, [and] once you get something you never want to give it up”he said. Students shouldn’t ignore the desti tute lives of their counterparts all around the world. The rivers in India are the equiva lent of an American stopped-up com mode, the kind Americans would not want to clean. Those long programs on television asking for money for starving children are not studio productions. They are the most brutal faces of death. It is estimated that 20,000 people an nually in Guatemala die of hunger alone. Also, even with its sometimes corrupt government and inept bureaucracy, the United States is a free country, and its people have a fair amount of control. The human rights maintained here put U.S. citizens in the penthouse of the world. Many countries are just now surviving their first elections, the fruits of decades of bloodshed and American intervention. Between 1985 and 1988, when de mocratic government was first estab lished in Guatemala, the percentage of the population in extreme poverty grew from 45 percent to 76 percent according to the U.N. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. Guatemala is not alone. Studies from the Nutritional Institute of Central Amer ica and Panama show that half of Central Americans live in extreme poverty. United States citizens are richer, more free, and, from this elevated status, more ungrateful than any other people. Ironically, it seems people have to contract a fatal disease to be thankful for life. Some of the most cheerful and thankful people I have been around are those who don’t have long to live. Really, though, all people should be grateful for the borrowed time on which they live. Everyone has problems: Not enough sleep, not enough money, too much home work, homicidal boss, uncertain future. But I remember a teenage kid sitting in a wheelchair in the aisle of a hardware store, slight of build and deformed. His eyes were dull, and his movements were jerky and slow. The one thing he had is his four-year-old brother, who stood by the wheelchair and chattered and showed him he loved him. Compared to his life, mine is charmed. A&M may turn out great students, but if they have no gratitude, they will be worthless human beings. ****** % te DOWN ID THE mi TO FEMALfe IN THE MILITARY WHO MVENT REPORTED £&Ne SWuAluY ABUSBX. I** ***- 1 *** «5r*^ ★ MARCH to. 2 Mail Misprint offends, surprises readers You guys need to get a new editor. In the article “Yahoo! - Stanford benefits from gift” in the sixth para graph, you guys chose to leave in a word most professional publica tions would not print. I don’t see how this could get by anyone actu ally doing their job. I am very offended by this lan guage and it now confirms my view that The Battalion is not worth the paper it is printed on. Scott Chitwood Class of’95 I am sad to see you allowing such language to filter onto your pages. Michael Hamelin Obscenity adds color to article I would like to commend the ed itors of The Battalion for choosing to include the word “f—kers” in an otherwise bland AP news brief on page 2 of Thursday’s edition. This ingenious strategy will no doubt cause students to take time and notice articles of The Battalion (other than those found on the Op/Ed page) while quickly scan ning for the comics. This sets a new precedent in col lege news media. By challenging the power of “obscene” words formed by otherwise ordinary let ters, the editors of the Batt could start a new grass-roots movement to diminish the power of this and other “four-letter- words”, and lessen the conservative grip on this otherwise enjoyable university. I see the future of the Batt. It’s chock full of articles written from the heart, without regard for lan guage choice. It reads like a Rolling Stone magazine. Everybody loves it. Tyler Robison Class of‘98 EDITOR’S NOTE: In an article appearing on the Debriefing page of Thursday’s Battalion, an error was made that in seven letters jeopar dized a reputation the paper has been trying to buildfor several years. The obscenity, which was ill-ad visedly inserted by a staff member, was unintentionally allowed to make it through to final printing. The inciden t has not be regard ed lightly, and serious reprimands are being taken. We at The Battalion take our jobs very seriously and it is because of irresponsibility on one staff member’s part that we have unin tentionally offended many of our readers. We apologize. As student journalists, we can learn from this experience so that we can make sure the same mistake is not repeated.