Page 12
The Battalion
Thursday, September 16,195:
Health Tips
By Amy Lamb
Special to The Battalion
Is the space in your dorm not
big enough for all three of you?
Are you and your roommate com
pletely opposite? Are you consid
ering moving? Before you make
any drastic decisions, try these
suggestions to make your life and
your roommate's life easier.
First, discuss personal expec
tations with your roommate.
This usually (deals with behav
iors and personalities. Find out
what things make them happy!
Ask them about personal space
and how they handle stress in
their daily life.
You might want to sit down
and just talk about the above sug
gestions and any other difficul
ties you might have. For exam
ple, inquire about personal val
ues such as smoking, drinking,
studying habits, sleeping habits,
overnight guests and extracurric
ular activities.The majority of
your problems with your room
mate can be resolved if you talk
them out.
If problems arise between
you and your roommate, try
these solutions for arguments
which can act as guidelines to
follow. When you complain
about a problem, have a plan to
solve it. Be patient and listen to
what is being said. Make sure
that when an argument does
arise, discuss it in private.
Consider a compromise be
tween you and your roommate
with each being positive about
the result. With compromise, nei
ther roommate has to fully give
up what she/he was fighting for.
The solutions may not be right
for you, but do not neglect the
problems by ignoring them.
You may not become good
friends with your roommate,
but you must be respectful of
your roommate's thoughts and
feelings. Being able to live with
your roommate requires work
ing together and accepting your
differences in a positive manner.
Any negative feelings that arise
should always be discussed and
understood.
One way of fulfilling this re
quirement is by filling out a
Roommate Bill of Rights. Tnis
form can be obtained from your
resident adviser, Texas A&M
Counseling Services, Health Edu
cation Center and the A.P. Beutel
Health Center.
The Bill of Rights lists specific
items that should be discussed
by each roommate; for example:
study times, a clean environ
ment, when to host guests, per
sonal privacy, etc. This is a help
ful document that eliminates un
wanted stress.
If you need additional assis
tance, please contact your Area
Residence Hall office or come by
the Health Education Center,
Room 016, for further informa
tion on roommate communica
tion, stress, and other health and
wellness problems or concerns.
PUBLIC NOTICE
BRIEF EXPLANATORY STATEMENTS
OF PROPOSED
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS
SPECIAL ELECTION
NOVEMBER 2, 1993
PROPOSITION NO. 1
ON THE BALLOT
Senate Joint Resolution 9 proposes a
constitutional amendment that would au
thorize the Texas Legislature to provide
for the issuance of bonds for the state fi
nancing of start-up costs for historically
nderutilized businesses. The amend-
\ent provides that the legislature by law
ay establish a Texas historically under-
ilized business capital growth and
rt-up fund. The money in the fund may
used without further appropriation
only for a program established by the
lature to aid in the start-up costs of a
rically underutilized business, as de-
py the legislature. To carry out the
,^m, the legislature may issue up to
p^ 0 jion of general obligation bonds to
9t/7> e funding. The legislature may re-
°f b 0 r, '> ew an< l approval of the issuance
of f^ e f4 the use of the bond proceeds, or
gove tn ^les adopted by an agency to
author' Us ' t ^ le bond proceeds. Bonds
r- Ze d by the amendment constitute
a’^eheral obligation of the state.
The proposed amendment will appear
on the ballot as follows:
“The constitutional amendment au
thorizing the legislature to provide for
the issuance of $50 million of general
obligation bonds for the recovery and
further development of the state’s
economy and for increasing job oppor
tunities and other benefits for Texas
residents through state financing of
the start-up costs of historically un
derutilized businesses.”
PROPOSITION NO. 2
ON THE BALLOT
House Joint Resolution 86 proposes a
constitutional amendment authorizing
the legislature, by general law, to exempt
from ad valorem taxation all or part of
real and personal property used, con
structed, acquired, or installed wholly or
partly to meet or exceed rules or regula
tions adopted by any environmental pro
tection agency of the United States,
Texas, or a political subdivision of this
state for the prevention, monitoring, con
trol, or reduction of air, water, or land
pollution. The amendment applies to real
and personal property used as a facility,
device, or method for the control of air,
water, or land pollution that would other
wise be taxable for the first time on or
after January 1, 1994. The amendment
does not authorize the exemption from ad
valorem taxation of real or personal prop
erty that was subject to a tax abatement
agreement executed before January 1,
1994.
The proposed amendment will appear
on the ballot as follows:
“The constitutional amendment to
promote the reduction of pollution and
to encourage the preservation of jobs
by authorizing the exemption from ad
valorem taxation of real and personal
property used for the control of air,
water, or land pollution.”
PROPOSITION NO. 3
ON THE BALLOT
House Joint Resolution 3 proposes a
constitutional amendment to clear land
titles in which the State of Texas relin
quishes and releases any claim of sover
eign ownership or title to an undivided
one-third interest in and to the lands and
minerals within the Shelby, Frazier, and
McCormick League (now located in Fort
Bend and Austin counties) arising out of
the interest in that league originally
granted under the Mexican Colonization
Law of 1823 to John McCormick on or
about July 24, 1824, and subsequently
voided by the governing body of Austin’s
Original Colony on or about December
15, 1830. Title to such interest in the
lands and minerals is confirmed to the
owners of the remaining interests in such
lands and minerals.
The proposed amendment will appear
on the ballot as follows:
“The constitutional amendment pro
viding for the clearing of land titles by
the release of a state claim in a frac
tional interest, arising out of the void
ing of an interest under a Mexican
land grant, to the owners of certain
property in Fort Bend and Austin
counties.”
PROPOSITION NO. 4
ON THE BALLOT
Senate Joint Resolution 49 proposes a
constitutional amendment that would
prohibit a state personal income tax with
out voter approval and would dedicate
the proceeds of any income tax, if en
acted, to property tax relief and educa
tion. The amendment provides that a
general law enacted by the legislature
that imposes a tax on the net incomes of
natural persons, including a person’s
share of partnership and unincorporated
association income, must provide that the
portion of the law imposing the tax not
take effect until approved by a majority
of the registered voters voting in a state
wide referendum held on the question of
imposing the tax. The referendum must
specify the rate of the tax that will apply
to taxable income.
The amendment also provides that a
general law enacted by the legislature
that increases the rate of the tax, or
changes the tax in a manner that results
in an increase in the combined income tax
liability of all persons subject to the tax,
may not take effect until approved by a
majority of the registered voters voting
in a statewide referendum held on the
question of increasing the income tax.
The referendum must specify the manner
in which the proposed law would increase
the combined' tax liability of all persons
subject to the tax. The legislature may
repeal, or amend without increasing, a
tax approved by the voters without sub
mitting the amendment or the repeal to
the voters. If the legislature repeals a tax
approved by the voters, the legislature
may only reenact the tax without voter
approval if the effective date of the re
enactment of the tax is within one year of
the effective date of the repeal of the tax.
The amendment also provides that, in
the first year in which an income tax is
imposed, and during the first year of any
increase in the tax, not less than two-
thirds of all net revenues from the tax
shall be used to reduce the rate of ad val
orem maintenance and operation taxes
levied for the support of primary and sec
ondary education. In subsequent years,
not less than two-thirds of all net reve
nues of the tax shall be used to continue
such ad valorem tax relief. The net reve
nues of the tax remaining after the dedi
cation of money for reduction of ad val
orem maintenance and operation taxes
shall be used for support of education.
The maximum rate at which a school dis
trict may impose ad valorem maintenance
and operation taxes is reduced by an
amount equal to one cent per $100 valua
tion for each one cent per $100 valuation
that the school district’s ad valorem main
tenance and operation tax is reduced by
the minimum amount of money dedicated
under the amendment, provided that a
school district may subsequently increase
the maximum ad valorem maintenance
and operation tax rate if the increased
maximum rate is approved by a majority
of the voters of the school district voting
at an election called and held for that pur
pose. The portions of the amendment re
lating to dedicating tax revenues to re
duce the rate of ad valorem maintenance
and operation taxes apply on or after the
first January 1 after the date on which an
income tax takes effect, except that if the
income tax begins to apply on a January
1, the amendment applies to ad valorem
maintenance and operation taxes levied
on or after that date.
The proposed amendment will appear
on the ballot as follows:
“The constitutional amendment pro
hibiting a personal income tax without
voter approval and, if an income tax is
enacted, dedicating the revenue to
education and limiting the rate of local
school taxes.”
PROPOSITION NO. 5
ON THE BALLOT
Senate Joint Resolution 18 proposes a
constitutional amendment that would au
thorize the legislature to prescribe the
qualifications of sheriffs. Currently, the
constitution authorizes the legislature to
prescribe the duties, perquisites, and
fees of office, but not the qualifications for
the office of sheriff.
The proposed amendment will appear
on the ballot as follows:
“The constitutional amendment to al
low the legislature to prescribe the
qualifications of sheriffs.”
PROPOSITION NO. 6
ON THE BALLOT
House Joint Resolution 21 proposes a
constitutional amendment that would
abolish the office of county surveyor in
Jackson County. The amendment also
provides for the powers, duties, and func
tions of the county surveyor to be trans
ferred to the county officer designated by
the commissioners court. ,
The proposed amendment will appear,
on the ballot as follows:
“The constitutional amendment abol
ishing the office of county surveyor in
Jackson County.”
PROPOSITION NO. 7
ON THE BALLOT
House Joint Resolution 57 proposes a
constitutional amendment that repeals
article XII, section 6, of the Texas Con
stitution, which currently provides that
no corporation shall issue stock or bonds
except for money paid, labor done, or
property actually received, and that all
fictitious increase of stock or indebted
ness shall be void.
The proposed amendment will appear
on the ballot as follows:
“The constitutional amendment re
pealing certain restrictions on the
ability of corporations to raise capital.”
PROPOSITION NO. 8
ON THE BALLOT
House Joint Resolution 22 proposes a
constitutional amendment that would
authorize the commissioners court of
McLennan County to call an election to
abolish the office of county surveyor. The
office of county surveyor will be abolished
if a majority of the qualified voters of
McLennan County voting on the question
favor the abolition. If the office of county
surveyor is abolished, the amendment re
quires the maps, field notes, and other
records in the custody of the county sur
veyor to be transferred to the county
clerk of McLennan County. After aboli
tion, the amendment also grants the com
missioners court of McLennan County
the authority to employ or contract with a
qualified person to perform any of the
functions that would have been per
formed by the county surveyor if the
office had not been abolished.
The proposed amendment will appear
on the ballot as follows:
“The constitutional amendment to
abolish the office of county surveyor in
McLennan County.”
PROPOSITION NO. 9
ON THE BALLOT
Senate Joint Resolution 19 proposes an
amendment to article VIII, section 13 of
the Texas Constitution that would modify
the provisions for the redemption of real
property sold at a tax sale. The amend
ment deletes current language in article
VIII, section 13 that allows the legis
lature to provide for the sale of property
without trial to pay for delinquent taxes.
It also states that the deed to the new
owner vests a good and perfect title sub
ject only to redemption as set out in this
amendment or impeachment for fraud.
Language is added limiting application of
the current two-year redemption period
to former owners of residence home
steads and land designated for agricul
tural use sold for unpaid taxes. When
property is sold as the result of a suit to
enforce collection of unpaid taxes, the
amendment would allow the legislature to
limit redemption to property used as a
residence homestead or designated for
agricultural use at the time the suit was
filed. The amendment creates a second
type of redemption for former owners of
real property when property is neither a
residence homestead, nor designated for
agricultural use. These owners would
have a six-month period in which to
redeem their property by paying the
amount of money paid for the property,
including the Tax Deed Recording Fee,
all taxes, penalties, interest, and costs
paid plus an amount not exceeding 25
percent of the aggregate total. The
amendment applies to redemption of
properties sold at a tax sale for which the
purchaser’s deed is filed on or after Janu
ary X, 1994. For redemption of properties
sold at a tax sale for which the pur
chaser’s deed was filed before January 1,
1994, the former law is applicable and re
mains in effect.
The proposed amendment will appear
on the ballot as follows:
“The constitutional amendment to
modify the provisions for the redemp
tion of real property sold at a tax
sale.”
PROPOSITION NO. 10
ON THE BALLOT
Senate Joint Resolution 34 proposes a
constitutional amendment that adds a
new section 49-b-2 to article III of the
Texas Constitution. This new section pro
vides that, in addition to the general obli
gation bonds authorized to be issued and
sold by the Veterans’ Land Board (the
“Board”) by sections 49-b ($950 million)
and 49-b-l ($1.3 billion) of article III, the
board may provide for, issue, and sell
general obligation bonds of the state in an
amount not to exceed $750 million to pro
vide financing to Texas veterans. $250
million of the bonds authorized by this
new section shall be used to augment the
Veterans’ Land Fund (the “Land Fund”).
The Land Fund shall be used by the
Board to purchase lands situated in Texas
owned by the United States government,
an agency of the United States govern
ment, the State of Texas, a political sub
division or agency of the State of Texas,
or a person, firm, or corporation. The
lands shall be sold to veterans in quan
tities, on terms, at prices, and at fixed,
variable, floating, or other rates of inter
est determined by the Board. Lands in
the Land Fund that are offered for sale to
veterans and that are not sold may be
sold or resold to the purchasers in quan
tities, terms, prices, and rates of interest
determined by the Board.
New section 49-b-2 creates the Vet
erans’ Housing Assistance Fund II (the
“Housing Fund II”), and $500 million of
the general obligation bonds authorized
by the section shall be used for the Hous
ing Fund II. The Housing Fund II is a
separate and distinct fund from the Vet
erans’ Housing Assistance Fund (the
“Housing Fund”) established under sec
tion 49-b-l of article IIH Money in the
Housing Fund II shall Ire administered
by the Board and shall be used to make
home mortgage loans to veterans for
housing within this state in quantities, on
terms, and at fixed, variable, floating, or
other rates of interest determined by the
Board. The principal of, and interest on,
the general obligation bonds authorized
by this section for the benefit of the
Housing Fund II shall be paid out of the
money of the Housing Fund II. The prin
cipal of, and interest on, the general obli
gation bonds authorized by section 49-b-l
of article III for the benefit of the Hous
ing Fund shall be paid out of money in the
Housing Fund. If . there is not enough
money in the Land Fund, the Housing
Fund, or the Housing Fund II, as the
case may be, available to pay the prin
cipal of, and interest on, the general obli
gation bonds authorized by this section or
by sections 49-b or 49-b-l of article III,
there is appropriated out of the first
money coming into the treasury in each
fiscal year an amount that is sufficient to
pay the principal of, and interest on, the
general obligation bonds that mature or
become due during that fiscal year.
If the Board determines that assets
from the Land Fund, the Housing Fund,
or the Housing Fund II are not required
for purposes of the fund, the Board may
transfer the assets to another of those
funds or use the assets to secure revenue
bonds issued by the Board. The revenue
bonds shall be special obligations of the
Board and payable only from and secured
by receipts of the funds, assets trans
ferred from the funds, and other reve
nues as determined by the Board and
shall not constitute indebtedness of the
State of Texas or the Board. The Board
may issue revenue bonds from time to
time, which bonds may not exceed an ag
gregate principal amount that the Board
determines can be fully retired from the
receipts of the funds. The revenue bonds
shall be sold in forms, denominations, and
in installments, and bear a rate or rates
of interest as the Board determines.
The general obligation bonds autho
rized to be issued by the Board by this
section or be sections 49-b and 49-b-l of
article III shall be issued and sold in
forms and denominations, on terms, at
times, in the manner, at places, in install
ments, and shall bear a rate or rates
of interest the Board determines. The
bonds shall be incontestable after execu
tion by the Board, approval by the At
torney General of Texas, and delivery to
the purchaser.
The proposed amendment will appear
on the ballot as follows:
“The constitutional amendment au
thorizing issuance of $750 million in
general obligation bonds to augment
the Veterans’ Land Fund and the Vet
erans’ Housing Assistance Fund and
to fund the Veterans’ Housing Assis
tance Fund II.”
PROPOSITION NO. 11
ON THE BALLOT
Senate Joint Resolution 31 proposes a
constitutional amendment relating to the
duties of trustees of local retirement sys
tems which provide retirement and re
lated disability and death benefits for
public officers and employees and that do
not belong to a statewide retirement sys
tem. The amendment provides that the
Anheuser-Busch plans to tap
into Japanese beer market
The Associated Press
TOKYO — Anheuser-Busch Inc. is preparing to announce a joiiil
venture with Japan's No. 1 beer maker, Kirin Brewery Co. Ltd., inorda
to tap further into one of the world's biggest beer markets.
Anheuser, the world's biggest brewer, is dropping an affiliation with]
smaller brewer, Suntory Ltd. to link up with Kirin. The U.S. breweristhe
biggest foreign beer in Japan, yet has only a 1.2 percent market share.
Anheuser is also hoping to take advantage of recent moves to dereg
ulate the alcohol industry by becoming the first foreign brewer to set
up its own distribution network.
Anheuser-Busch had relied on Suntory, Japan's largest whiskey
maker but a lightweight in the beer business, to brew and market Bud-
weiser under license since 1984.
Bud sales had been growing, but not at the rate one might expectfor
the world's top brand.
The St. Louis brewer hopes to change all that with the deal to be an
nounced Thursday — a joint venture owned 90 percent by Anheuser
and 10 percent by Kirin, which controls half the domestic beer market
and is the fourth biggest brewer worldwide.
board of trustees of such a system shall
(1) administer the system of benefits; (2)
hold the assets of the system for the ex
clusive purposes of providing benefits to
participants and their beneficiaries and
defraying reasonable expenses of admin
istering the system; and (3) select legal
counsel and an actuary and adopt sound
actuarial assumptions to be used by the
system.
The proposed amendment will appear
on the ballot as follows:
“The constitutional amendment pro
viding that the trustees of a local pub
lic pension system must administer
the system for the benefit of the sys
tem’s participants and beneficiaries/
PROPOSITION NO. 12
ON THE BALLOT
House Joint Resolution 23 proposes a
constitutional amendment providing that
any person accused of a violent or sexual
offense committed while under the super
vision of a criminal justice agency of this
state or a political subdivision of this
state for a prior felony may, after a hear
ing and evidence substantially showing
the guilt of the accused, be denied bail
pending trial. If the accused is not, how
ever, accorded a trial within 60 days from
the time of his incarceration upon the ac
cusation or indictment, the order denying
bail shall be set aside unless a conti
nuance is obtained upon the request of
the accused. In the amendment, the term
“violent offense” means murder, aggra
vated assault (if a deadly weapon was
used or exhibited during the commission
of the assault), aggravated kidnapping,
or aggravated robbery. The term “sexual
offense” means aggravated sexual as
sault, sexual assault, or indecency with a
child.
The proposed amendment will appear
on the ballot as follows:
“The constitutional amendment per
mitting the denial of bail to certain
persons charged with certain violent
or sexual offenses committed while
under the supervision of a criminal
justice agency of the state or a politi
cal subdivision of the state.”
PROPOSITION NO. 13
ON THE BALLOT
Senate Joint Resolution 13 proposes a
constitutional amendment that amends
article VII, section 17(a), of the Texas
Constitution to provide that, of the $100
million currently appropriated by that
section for the use of public institutions of
higher education during each fiscal year,
those institutions may also utilize this
money to pay for acquiring, constructing,
or equipping or for major repair or re
habilitation of buildings, facilities, other
permanent improvements, or capital
equipment used jointly for educational
and general activities and for auxiliary
enterprises to the extent of their use for
educational and general activiti<*s. For
the five-year period beginning on Sep
tember 1, 2000, and for each five-year pe
riod thereafter, the legislature, during a
regular session that is nearest, but pre
ceding, a five-year period may, by a two-
thirds vote of the membership of each
house, increase the amount of the $100
million constitutional appropriation for
the five-year period. The amendment also
reflects name changes that have been
made to some of the institutions of higher
education for which such funding is avail
able. The amendment adds the Texas
State Technical College System to those
institutions eligible to receive such fund
ing, but limits its allocation of the annual
appropriation to 2.2 percent of the total
appropriation each fiscal year. The
amendment also provides that each gov
erning board authorized to participate in
the distribution of money under article
III, section 17, may also issue bonds and
notes for the purposes of refunding bonds
or notes issued under that section or
prior law for the purposes of acquiring
capital equipment, library books and li
brary materials, paying for acquiring,
constructing, or equipping or for major
repair or rehabilitation of buildings, facil
ities, other permanent improvements, or
capital equipment used jointly for educa
tional and general activities and for auxil
iary enterprises to the extent of their use
for educational and general activities.
The amendment deletes language in ar
ticle III, section 17, which authorizes the
legislature to designate a single agency to
issue such bonds or notes in lieu of the
governing bodies, and to transfer to that
agency the authority to collect and pledge
money to the payment of such bonds and
notes as directed by the governing body
of each eligible institution. Funds appro
priated under article III, section 17, may
not be used for the purpose of construct
ing, equipping, repairing, or rehabilitat
ing buildings or other permanent im
provements that are to oe used only foi
student housing, intercollegiate athletics
or auxiliary enterprises.
The proposed amendment will appeal
on the ballot as follows:
“The constitutional amendment relat
ing to the amount and expenditure ol
certain constitutionally dedicated
funding for public institutions oi
higher education.”
PROPOSITION NO. 14
ON THE BALLOT
Senate Joint Resolution 45 proposes a
constitutional amendment that adds a
new subsection (e) to article III, sectioi
49-h, of the Texas Constitution. The mj
subsection provides that, in addition to
the amounts authorized by subsections
(a) ($500 million), (c) ($400 million), and
(d) ($1.1 billion) of section 49-h, the legis
lature may authorize the issuance of upto
$1 billion in general obligation bonds and
may use the proceeds of the bonds for ac
quiring, constructing, or equipping ne»
corrections institutions, including youtk
corrections institutions, and mental
health and mental retardation institu
tions and for major repair or renovatk
of existing facilities of those corrections
and mental health and mental retardatioi
facilities. The amendment also provides
that the provisions of subsection (a) i
section 49-h, relating to the review and
approval of bonds, and the provisions d
subsection (b) of section 49-h, relating!!
the status of the bonds as a general obi
gation of the state and to the manner '
which the principal and interest on ti
bonds are paid, apply to bonds authorize
by this amendment.
The proposed amendment will appeal
on the ballot as follows:
The constitutional amendment autho
rizing the issuance of up to $1 billion
in general obligation bonds payable
from the general revenues of the state
for projects relating to facilities oi
corrections and mental health and
mental retardation institutions.”
PROPOSITION NO. 15
ON THE BALLOT
House Joint Resolution 37 proposes a
constitutional amendment that would au
thorize the county commissioners courtof
a county to call an election to abolish the
office of county surveyor. The office of
county surveyor is abolished if a majority
of voters of the county voting in the elec
tion approve the measure. If the office of
county surveyor is abolished, the maps,
field notes, and other records of the
county surveyor are transferred to the
county officer or employee designated by
the commissioners court.
The proposed amendment will appear
on the ballot as follows:
“The constitutional amendment to
permit the voters of a county to de
cide, at an election called by the com
missioners court, whether to abolish
the office of county surveyor in the
county.”
PROPOSITION NO. 16
ON THE BALLOT
Senate Joint Resolution 44 proposes an
amendment to article III, section 49-i(b)
of the Texas Constitution, which cur
rently limits the principal amount of
bonds outstanding at one time for the
Texas agricultural fund to $25 million and
for the rural microenterprise develop
ment fund to $5 million. The amendment
would raise the principal amount limit for
the Texas agricultural fund to $100 mil
lion. The amendment would also make
the principal amount limit for each fund
apply to the total principal amounts of
both bonds and notes issued or sold
rather than just the principal amounts of
bonds outstanding at one time.
The proposed amendment will appear
on the ballot as follows:
“The constitutional amendment au
thorizing up to a total of $100 million
in bonds and notes to be issued or sold
to finance the Texas agricultural fund
for providing financial assistance to
develop, increase, improve, or expand
the production, processing, market
ing, or export of crops or products
grown or produced primarily in this
state by agricultural businesses
domiciled in the state.”
Este es el inforvie explanatorio sobrt
la enmienda propuesta a la constituciW
que aparecerd en la boleta el dia 2 dt
noviembre de 1993. Si usted no ha re-
cibido una copia del informe en espahol,
podrd obtener una gratis por llamar al
H800125218683 o por escribir al Seen-
tario de Estado, P.O. Box 12060, Austin,
Texas 78711
Published by Secretary of State
John Hannah, Jr.
jULI PHILLIP!
DAVE THOM,
BELINDA BLA
MACK HARRI
P£/C
“■We’ve
losi
The Texas
Authority aj
on the verge
all-new bu
TVG Corpor
can French <
with the co
system — a
completed 1
century.
The adva
tem are obv
from simpl
travel safety
Traveling
Houston fre
Station last
one and a h
Balias canr
less than thr
By bulle
Houston w<
mated 43 mi
trip lasting <
utes. For the
and other tri
savings in tir
tivity make
very attracts
Frojectic
eventually I
will be able
lion traveler
consequeno
gestion on i
will be sign
Roc
S oooo, yoi
you have
roommal
troubles?
For better
worse, a sign
part of col leg
isadjusting t<
dorm or apar
life.
There are 1
lytwo kinds (
ganisms that
to be dealt wi
dwelling. Boi
be found in tf
newspaper or
boned by frie
Sometimes, v\
they are alrea
apartment.
If this is th
that you're be
inhabitants fc
Generally, thi
bow disgusti:
and who's re:
Brey never n
hot, but be ce
Put ir
pay p