Page 2AThe Battalion/Friday, September 30, 1988 Opinion e>\w hoo^twj p^r Mail Call New bonfire site proposed EDITOR: I agree with Anthony Wilson’s proposal to move bonfire to a less populated area. How about staff parking lot 5 1 behind Zachary. It’s the emptiest placebn campus. Darrell Pesek ’88 pti Hotard exists EDITOR: I his is a letter of sincere gratitude to all the terrific guys and the resident director, Gary Buck, in Hotard Hall. They made a stupendous ef fort and round up over one-third of the residents — about forty guys — to meet at fourth floor Mosher for a cross-dine we invited them to on Tuesday. Unfortunately, I was the only one waiting at the Commons to meet them (fortunate for me because the odds in my favor were incredible!). Being the good sports that they are, they graciously invited me to eat at Sbisa with them. 1 he guys handled the whole situation really well and I had a great timeeati® with them at THE TABLE! I cannot stress enough how much 1 appreciate the courtesy and non-apathetic attitude shown by the guys from Hotard Mall! Thanjts, guys! You’re super! Definitely 100 percenters! Kelly Vaughn ’91 Letters to the editor should not exceed 300 words m length. The editorial staff reserves the right to edit lettmlm and length, but will make every effort to maintain the author's intent. Each letter must be signed and must incliii classification, address and telephone number of the writer. Home sweet home where the heck are you? There’s no place like home. I always believed Dorothy’s famous and oft-repeated words about her home in Kansas. Personally, I could never see what she saw in Kansas ex cept fields and wheat, but I gave her the benefit of At least, that’s how I felt until that fa teful day last spring when my parents called me with some good, although not completely unexpected news. My father had been offered a position at a presti gious engineering school in Indiana. He had been hoping for the opportunity to make a change of schools, and here was his chance. buildings and people. I could not pop in for a weekend visit. I probably would not even be able to go home for Thanks giving or birthday celebrations. I was going to be an orphan. Deserted. Lydia Berzsenyi the doubt. If she wanted to live in Kan sas, more power to her. Just give me a home in hot, humid southeast Texas and I’d be happy. I figured that would be just about the order of things for a long time. My family had lived in Beaumont for close to twenty years. Although most of my friends were away to school, their parents were still in Beaumont, so we al ways had a gathering place. I always as sumed that even if I went to live in Tim buktu, or even New York, I would always have my Beaumont home to fall back on. I was excited for him and, in fact, for the whole family. It would mean a new start in a new place — an adventure. My little brothers would be attending new schools, and my mother wouldn’t have any problem finding a new job in her field. And my dad would be happy in an highly academic environment which va lued his contributions to the mathemati cal world. Now that they’ve moved, however, I’m much more sane about things. I fig ure that I really didn’t go home that of ten anyhow, and I could still go back to Beaumont for visits whenever I wanted to. I think everyone I know from my next-door neighbor to my first grade teacher insisted I stay with them when I visit. And besides, I’ll probably move out of state at the end of this year and I wouldn’t be visiting much anyhow. summer, and I was only there for three days and I only have two boxes of old papers and an old doll house in the attic there but I have my winter coat and my summer swimsuit in my apartment in Bryan and I work in College Station and .... You see the problem? But when I hung up the phone, the realization of the move began to sink in. There would be no more trips to Beau mont to see my family and the house 1 grew up in. I would not experience that little lift I always got when I drove into town, seeing the familiar streets and But there is one nagging question which has been nagging me ever since I saw Beaumont for the last time: When I meet new people and they ask the ques tion which is inevitably one of the first three questions in any introductory con versation, what do I answer? The ques tion: So, where are you from? The an swer: Well, I grew up in Beaumont but my parents moved to Indiana over the Then I started to realize there were quite a few people in my predicament. I never really noticed how many friends’ parents had moved since they had be gun college. Many of them could sym pathize, and some were even worse off than me. My roommate’s parents live in Saudi Arabia, so she definitely won’t be going for any weekend visits. Actually, my parents’ move is proba bly more beneficial for me than I thought. Although I was already paying most of my way through college, now I’m forced to be even more indepen dent. go to the optometrist to order anotlu one tor me. It would take twice as to get t he contact il she got it in It so I take care of it myself. Neediest: the dentist? If I have a cavity, wait till I go to Indiana where Monui have conveniently set up an a[ ment for me. Now I take care of it ir self. It’s not so much that I teelsobigs:; grown up now. Rather, I just feeltha: have more responsibility formyownl now. And that feels good. So what if I can’t zip in for thewd end? I know that I always have a to return to whenever I’d like./ can still feel homesick even it I misstl home I’ve only lived in for threedat Home is where mv family is, or,as saying goes, where the heart is. All those little chores I had unconsciously left up to Mom and Dad are my responsibility now. Lose a con tact? I can’t just call Mom and ask her to Dorothy really had something wilt she said there’s no place like home. Kansas? Well Lydia Berzsenyi is a senior matlm for and editor ofThe Battalion. Bush, Dukakis left many tough questions unanswered WASHING TON — Some questions that would cause Sun day night’s debat ers to shrivel up like salted snails: George Will For Dukakis: You campaigned in the streets of Ca- bridge with Helen Caldicott, the Austra lian extremist, in favor of a “nuclear freeze.” Yet you adore the INF agreement which was made possible by deployments, you and she opposed, of Pershings and cruise missiles. On Aug. 4, you said you still favored freeze (al though later your staff told you that you no longer did). Do you not owe the na tion an explanation and an apology? And while you are at it, explain this: Two weeks after you promised to spend billions on SDI, you mailed a fund-rais ing letter promising to “put an end to the dangerous Star Wars fantasy.” Say what? nerability of our land-based deterrent. It favors the mobile Midgetman and a mobile basing mode for MX. But the ad ministration has proposed a ban on mo bile missiles, because mobility compli cates verification and thus interferes with the fetish of arms control. Do you know which side of the debate you are on tonight? use of U.S. forces to plant democracy in the Dominican Republic in 1965. Is it a Dukakis Doctrine that two more dictatorships in this hemisphere would not matter. For Dukakis: You are the only gover nor who opposed his state’s partici pation in the GWEN (Ground Wave Emergency Network) project to provide the President with command-and-con- trol communications capable of surviv ing a Soviet first strike. A spokesman for you still says what you said in your 1986 letter to the Air Force, that such a sys tem would make nuclear war more likely. But how can there be deterrence if the enemy knows the United States lacks the capability to conduct a coun terattack? For Bush: The last large-scale use of U.S. force was in Vietnam, a disaster in the end. Should we never have helped South Vietnam resist aggression? Or should we have taken stronger military actions — which ones — to win? be recession. How far will the dollar col lapse and how high will interest rates soar when the next recession turns the annual Reagan-Bush budget deficit of $150 billion into a $300 billion Bush- Quayle deficit? For Bush: Your solution to the bud get dificit is a “flexible freeze” of spend ing. Isn’t that an oxymoron, the adjec tive nullifying the noun? To dispel the suspicion that flexibility would be used to appease every clamorous constitu ency, name the big-ticket programs you would not be flexible about. For Dukakis: You support the Su preme Court’s 1973 abortion ruling that a fetus is at no point a person with rights. But intra-uterine medicine now conducts surgery and other therapy on fetuses. Can a fetus be a patient but not a person? Should the Hypocratic Oath — “First, do no harm” — protect fetuses at least in the second and third trimes ters? giance; drug use and prostitution-lit eluding street solicitation — shoup legalized; homosexuals have a fi| be foster parents; all prisoners, n less of their of f enses, should bereleastt from prison and allowed to return their last place of residence to voted!' are you carrying that card? For Bush: Y ou cite Dukakis’ / card as evidence that he is unfitforini office. Will you describe your horror, revulsion, etc. about the fe that your Attorney General Riel Thornburgh was a member of ACLU in the late 1970s? For Bush: Before the Republican Na tional Convention you said, “Watch my vice-presidential decision. T hat will tell all.” All? For Bush: Talk about debates, the Reagan-Bush administration is having a dandy debate with itself. It embraces the Scowcroft Commission endorsement of mobile missiles as a response to the vul For Bush: Gorbachev wants a more efficient communism. Do you? If so, why? If not, will you link Soviet access to U.S. and multi-national economic insti tutions to changes in Soviet behavior, specifically to an end to arms shipments to Nicaragua? For Dukakis: Congress howled when Attorney General Meese, acting on the “sauce for the gander” principle, ended Congress’ immunity to special prosecu tors. Was Meese right? Or do you think the Democratic-controlled Congress should be exempt from the rules it writes for others? For Dukakis: You opposed not only the liberation of Grenada but also the For Bush: Assuming that business cy cles have not been banished, there will For Dukakis: Campaigning in Iowa, you boasted of being a “card-carrying member” of the American Civil Liber ties Union. The official ACLU policy guide says, among many other things: there should be no tax-exempt status for churches and synagogues; the words “In God We Trust” should be taken off the currency and “Under God” should be stricken from the Pledge of Alle- For Dukakis: The next President"! reshape the Supreme Court. You at/ other opponents of Robert E stressed concern about “privacy” ri| Consider an issue currently gated: Do people who engage in sexual acts have a constitutional pritf right to serve in the military? For Bush: If during your preside® anyone proposes a plan as cockeyed* giving arms to the Ayatollah, do you® pect Vice President Quayle to respo® as you did, or do you expect him toi ject vigorously? Copyright Group 1988, Washington Post V/tifi The Battalion (USPS 045 360) Member of Texas Press Association Southwest Journalism Conference The Battalion Editorial Board Lydia Berzsenyi, Editor Becky Weisenfels, Managing Editor Anthony Wilson, Opinion Page Editor Richard Williams, City Editor D A Jensen, Denise Thompson, News Editors Hal Hammons, Sports Editor Jay Janner, Art Director Leslie Guy, Entertainment Editor Editorial Policy The Battalion is a non-profit, self-supporting newspa per operated as a community service to Texas A&M and Bryan-College Station. Opinions expressed in The Battalion arc those of the editorial board or the author, and do not necessarily rep resent the opinions of Texas A&M administrators, fac ulty or the Board of Regents. The Battalion also serves as a laboratory newspaper for students in reporting, editing and photography classes within the Department of Journalism. The Battalion is published Monday through Friday during Texas A&M regular semesters, except for holiday and examination periods. Mail subscriptions are $17.44 per semester, $34.62 per school year and $36.44 per full year. Advertising rates furnished on request. Our address: The Battalion, 230 Reed McDonald, Texas A&M University, College Station. TX 77843-1 111. Second class postage paid at College Station, TX 77843. POSTMASTF.R: Send address changes to The Battal ion , 216 Reed McDonald, Texas A&M Universitt, Col lege Station TX 77843-4 111. BLOOM COUNTY by Berke Breathed LAPIB5 ANP oememN... Ihie 5UR6Z0N beNeKAL OF UNITBP STATE0 -