The Battalion. (College Station, Tex.) 1893-current, February 09, 1988, Image 1
The Battalion Yol. 87 No. 91 CJSPS 045360 12 Pages College Station, Texas Tuesday, February 9, 1988 re t froni 0 jj ils. )itthelauj iry operas require r reratingJ itity. ■ Service r J chariiablfl ise moneil ilielter- rkerssavil «e i f the Hoi Ilion ina:.;| acks ‘ighborkj — a 15-\i ead by; i 10-yeard t last wetil fered aii ere hospj ; beater, troops, ons said 2 48 the n illed in t demonit aeli ocr.:| 1967. ed ledforEi nuan ity Dish .er ruk jition 1 itingtoc ading ‘ ;r, No( Bateiraii :ar r two ft ;ree ,'ear-old Chill out Junior engineering major Dana Rummerfield tries to keep warm between classes. Rummerfield is a Photo by Shelly Schluuter native Californian and is not used to the current cool temperatures. Senate will hear views on final exam schedule By Karen Kroesche Senior Staff Writer Faculty members will have a chance to make their opinions heard on the senior finals scheduling issue at an open hearing Feb. 17, Speaker of the Faculty Senate C. Richard Shumway said Monday. The Executive Committee of the Senate scheduled the hearings as a forum for open discussion on the compromise schedule that was re cently approved by the Student Sen ate. The hearings will be held from 4 p.m. to 5 p.m. in MSC Room 206. Jay Hays, speaker of the Student Senate, said Shumway invited stu dent senators to attend the hearings and answer questions on the pro posed finals schedule. “It’s essentially a faculty hearing at which they want student represen tatives who have been working on this issue to answer questions,” Hays said. The students’ proposed schedule would move finals this semester to May 9-13 for undergraduates and to May 7, 9 and 10 for graduating se niors. Graduation ceremonies would still be held May 13 and 14. Shumway said the student’s pro posal will be presented for possible endorsement at the next regular meeting of the Faculty Senate on March 7. One of the students’ biggest com plaints about the current schedule was that the campus would be empty when seniors graduate. The propo sal solves that problem. Student and faculty representa tives arrived at the compromise at a recent meeting between the two groups. The Battalion reported Jan. 20 that Student Senate and Faculty Sen ate officers were meeting to discuss the finals schedule after both groups expressed displeasure with the plan that is currently in place. In the article, Hays said that last semester’s trial run of the schedule created problems for both faculty and students. “It pointed out a lot of problems in the practical application of the schedule,” he said in the Battalion story. See related story, Page 1 Faculty senators criticize Sherrill’s professor title By Karen Kroesche Senior Staff Writer Faculty Senators Monday crit icized Jackie Sherrill’s appointment as full professor with tenure, but the Senate tabled a resolution condemn ing the action. The Board of Regents granted the title to Sherrill at its Jan. 24 meeting, praising his accomplish ments as A&M athletic director. .'t\J tereotyping plagues A&M athletes The Senate debated at length whether to formally discuss a resolu tion from Dr. David R. Anderson that expressed “deep regret” at the Board’s actions. Anderson sub mitted the resolution as an emer gency measure at Monday’s meeting after the Executive Committee ta bled the resolution prior to the meeting and refused to put it on the agenda. According to parliamentary pro cedure, a majority vote of the Fac ulty Senate was required in order to place the resolution on the agenda for formal discussion. After 40 min utes of debate, the Senate voted to include Anderson’s resolution on the agenda and discuss it formally, but then tabled it by a vote of 49-17. The resolution stated: “Whereas the Faculty Senate recognizes the achievements of the University’s ath letic programs under the leadership of Jackie Sherrill, but “Whereas faculty status, rank, and the award of tenure require aca demic qualifications, experience and achievement or achievement in arts, letters or sciences outside the aca demy, and “Whereas individual departments and colleges have established proce- See Sherrill, page 6 i aid's I •RY By Tracy Staton Senior Staff Writer If it were possible to open the lompartment labeled “athlete” in nost people’s brains, out would step huge, muscular man sporting a Bazed facial expression. He would probably be holding a football. “Yo,” the man would say. “I’ve got >go to practice. No time for school, tut who cares if I flunk out?” This vision crumbles when exam ined under the bright light of fact. There’s a wide world of sports be yond football, and football players Athletes at A&M Part one of a four-part series don’t always fit the stereotype of brawniness and stupidity. But these misconceptions abound in the world of student athletics, and Texas A&M is no exception. P. Clark Whiteside, associate di rector of the Aggie Club, says the stereotypes linger because people don’t make an effort to think other wise. “People are really enforcing the prejudice and the ignorance because they don’t know or take the time to hear the way it really is,” Whiteside, Class of’78, says. “Everyone consid ers college athletics to be football — period — and that’s not how it is.” The stereotype keeps people from noticing other athletes besides foot ball players, further strengthening this narrow view, he says. “When someone is making judgments about athletes, he may be sitting next to a woman golfer, and he doesn’t know she’s an athlete just because she’s not 6 foot 8 inches and 280 pounds,” Whiteside says. Jenny . Breummer, a junior exer cise technology major, comes into contact with many athletes through her job at East Kyle. She says some athletes are just like the typical stu dent, but others aren’t as pleasant. “There are some that are really cocky, but some are just regular guys,” she says. “There are very few jerks, but I think those few are the ones that make the athletes look bad.” Lynn Hickey, assistant director for women’s athletics, says another See Athletes, page 6 Athlete arraigned for assault charge, released on bond Igesfoi ;onsists Ibsani Tiber of tudents try to prevent faculty club shot® leranil ografl I him at I viduali By Jeff Pollard Staff Writer The Faculty Club of Texas A&M Jniversity is less than a month away trom completing work on the faculty aunge in Rudder Tower, but some |A&M students and former students ire looking to keep the grand-open- gcelebrations from happening. The lounge is being constructed 1 the top two floors of Rudder bwer, where the public dining fa- iility used to be. The dining room as opened on June 17, 1977, and was open to the public tor breakfast and lunch until it was closed last fall. In a Jan. 28 faculty club newslet ter, the founding board of directors of the faculty club, comprised of 868 paying faculty members, says they will plan special events for students on occasions like graduation or Par ent’s Day. The newsletter says while “. . . they have always been mindful of student desires not to be totally excluded from the tower, our policy in no way implies student usage on other than those occasions such as those mentioned.” Students have started a petition that protests the faculty club’s exclu sion of students and suggests that the club be re-opened to the public. The petition is being circulated through the office of Mason Hogan, student body president. This is the first time many stu dents have been informed of the re strictions being placed on the tower. Hogan says few people even knew about the club before this semester. “I was under the impression that about 15 students a day would be able to use the club if they made a reservation,” Hogan said. ‘Ob viously that is not to be the case.” The petition says “undersigned taxpayers and voters of Texas” are opposed to the takeover of the top floors of a state-owned building (Rudder Tower) for the use as a pri vate club for the faculty of A&M. Such discriminatory use, the peti tion says, would prohibit the free dom of the use of this space by any and all tax payers/citizens of Texas See Petition, page 7 rtstf Clements pleased with A&M plans to cap enrollment By Todd Riemenschneider Staff Writer Gov. William P. Clements was in College Station Monday and ap proved of the enrollment manage ment program at Texas A&M. Clements said he is pleased to find out what A&M has planned for en rollment management. “I was pleased to hear what they lave in mind with regard to the en rollment procedures and the pop ulation of the institution,” he said. The enrollment management irogram is designed to get the num- )er of students on campus in line ivith the facilities the University has to offer. “I think this is part of what we need to do across the state to better use our resources, wherever they are, like this A&M campus and its j $ system and to improve the quality of our education, our students and the iroducts we are turning out in ligher eduction,” Clements said. The governor said he believes the enrollment management program at A&M and the University of Texas at Austin will help out other schools in the state. “I think this will be highly benefi cial to all of the schools down stream, wherever they may be,” Clements said, “because it will give them the opportunity to participate in a level of students that had been coming here or going to Austin and instead, they will be going down stream into some of these other institutions.” “This (enrollment management) will enhance the quality of these other institutions,” he said. Since the enrollment manage ment program will raise the admis sion requirements to the University, questions have been raised as to what this will do to minority student re cruitment. Clements said he is aware of the need at A&M and UT to bring min- iorty enrollments up. Photo by Jay Janner Gov. Bill Clements answers questions Monday as Chancellor Perry Adkisson watches. “First of all, I know there is a stre- nous effort at both institutions here in College Station, as well as in Aus tin, to increase the sheer numbers of minorities on campus,” he said. Clements said the goal in these programs are never met, however, much progress has been made and deserves to be noticed. “We never do as well in these things as we would like to, but we have made enormous progress, there is no question about that,” Clements said. “I think it is time that everyone recognize the progess we have made, instead of being so crit- See Clements, page 5 By Drew Leder Staff Writer Texas A&M football player Guy Broom was arraigned Monday on one charge of aggrevated assault and two counts of misdemeanor as sault as a result of an incident Jan. 30 that resulted in the hospitilization of two A&M students and a College Station man. Broom, a senior who played de fensive end for A&M the past four years, and his lawyer, were at the Brazos County Courthouse when the warrant was issued. Broom turned himself in to police shortly afterwards, said College Station De tective Richard VanNest, who headed the investigation of the inci dent. Broom went before a judge at 10:40 a.m. Monday and VanNest said he was released on personal re cognizance after posting a bond of $3,300. In about 30 days he will ap pear before a judge to enter a plea. If found guilty of the aggrevated assault charge, which is a third-de gree felony. Broom could face a sen tence of between two and 10 years in a Texas Department of Corrections facility and a maximum fine of $5,000. The misdemeanor charges carry a maximum fin'e of $1,000 and up to one year in jail. However, all of the charges could be probated, which would result in no prison time or fine, assistant Brazos County At torney Rod Anderson said. “The sentence all depends on the circumstances and the defendant’s background, and there is no way to estimate a probable sentence,” An derson said. If the case goes to trial, the county attorney’s office will prosecute the misdemeanor assault charges while the district attorney’s office will prosecute the felony charges. Andy Barclay underwent surgery Thursday for the injuries he sus tained in the incident. Police records show the College Station man told them Broom assaulted him, his wife Mary, and Walter Voigtman for no apparent reason in the Woodstone Shopping Center parking lot. Barclay had two steel pins placed in his broken collar bone and several torn ligaments in his shoulder area repaired, Mrs. Barclay said Monday. Barclay was released from the hospi tal Friday, she said. Mrs. Barclay said her husband could not respond to questions Mon day. He has missed the last six days Guy Broom of school and she said he is expected to be out until next week. Mrs. Bar clay said he probably will not be able to return to his regular job as a lum ber sales clerk for some time because it requires lifting heavy objects. Barclay’s surgery was one reason for the lapse of time between the in cident and the filing of charges, said VanNest, who added he wanted to see the outcome of the surgery be fore issuing a warrant. The lapse before Broom was ar rested also gave police time to get their “paperwork together” and in vestigate the allegations, VanNest said. But, he said, so far the investi gation hasn’t turned up any wit nesses to the incident other than those involved. The Barclay’s said it was bystanders who originally told them Broom was the man involved. He said police are still looking for witnesses and hope someone who saw the incident will come forward. The Barclays and Voigtman told police Broom threw Barclay against the rear of a car, threw Voigtman, a political science major, against an open car door, and hit Mrs. Barclay, an elementary education major, in the face. The three told police the assault was unprovoked. The Battalion attempted to con tact Broom Monday night but A&M Assistant Sports Information Direc tor Colin Killian, a liaison between The Battalion and the Athletic De partment, said Broom would not want to comment on the charges.