The Battalion. (College Station, Tex.) 1893-current, December 02, 1987, Image 2
Page 2/The Battalion/Wednesday, December 2, 1987 The Battalion (USPS 045 360) Member of Texas Press Association Southwest Journalism Conference The Battalion Editorial Board Sondra Pickard, Editor John Jarvis, Managing Editor Sue Krenek, Opinion Page Editor Rodney Rather, City Editor Robbyn Lister, News Editor Loyd Brumfield, Sports Editor Tracy Staton, Photo Editor ea Editorial Policy The Battalion is a non-profit, self-supporting newspaper oper ated as a community service to Texas A&M and Bryan-College Sta tion. Opinions expressed in The Battalion are those of the editorial board or the author, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Texas A&M administrators, faculty or the Board of Regents. The Battalion also serves as a laboratory newspaper for students in reporting, editing and photography classes within the Depart ment of Journalism. The Battalion is published Monday through Friday during Texas A&M regular semesters, except for holiday and examination periods. Mail subscriptions are $17.44 per semester, $34.62 per school year and $36.44 per full year. Advertising rates furnished on re quest. Our address: The Battalion, 216 Reed McDonald, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4111. Second class postage paid at College Station, TX 77843. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to The Battalion, 216 Reed McDonald, Texas A&M University, College Station TX 77843-4111. Pettiness prevails The forces of paranoia have prevailed: Mikhail Gorbachev’s invitation to address a joint session of Congress has been with drawn. The elected officials who declared the Soviet leader didn’t merit the honor of speaking to Congress can sleep well, but per haps their dreams will be marred by the realization that they have ignored one of the principles of the Constitution they claim to uphold. Part of our national heritage is the belief that everyone is en titled to have and express his opinion even if that opinion meets with the disfavor of the majority. This is reflected in the First Amendment of the Constitution, which guarantees freedom of speech. Although the Bill of Rights applies only to American cit izens, it is based on beliefs about the rights of all people. U.S. of ficials have trampled on these rights by withdrawing the invita tion because they don’t agree with Gorbachev’s ideology. Too many Americans are quick to extend First Amendment protection to opinions they agree with, without realizing that the First Amendment extends protection to unpopular opinions as well. When our elected officials behave like petty children hold ing a members-only party, the only reinforce that attitude. — The Battalion Editorial Board Chicago mayor was his own worst enemy Within minutes after Mayor Har old Washington collapsed at his desk in Chicago’s City Hall, I phoned the may or’s former per sonal physician, who also happens to be my doctor. Even before I asked one ques tion, hg, flatly said: “He’s dead.” He briefly explained in medical terms why it was certain the mayor was already dead, although a hospital team would work frantically for two hours before the mayor’s death was acknowledged and announced. Then this doctor’s Usually calm voice turned angry. The anger was because he had once been more than the mayor’s physician. They had been friends for a long time, political allies for awhile. And he was angry because the mayor, for a bright man, had been treating himself like a fool. “I tried to get him in here,” the doc tor said. “We’d set up an appointment for a checkup, then one of his body guards would call and say that some thing had come up and he couldn’t make it. “So we’d reschedule. I’d set every thing up so we could do tests and he could be in and out in the briefest time. But it would happen again. They’d call and say he can’t make it. This went on for months. “Fat? That’s not the word. He’d be come massive. He gained at least 50 or 60 pounds since he took office. He ate junk food. And when he ordered some thing to eat, it was double everything. And he seldom had enough rest.” Every deadly sign had been there in previous checkups. Blood pressure, a disaster. Cholesterol, a disaster. On again, off again, and on again with the cigarettes. “He wouldn’t even take the medica tion I wanted to prescribe for him,” the doctor said. But why does someone, when they know that they’re flirting with death, ig nore the obvious signs and the obvious precautions? “I don’t know. Sometimes I think it’s because he wanted to be in control — it’s as if he didn’t want to surrender control to me.” So Harold Washington, at 65, died in much the way that he lived. On the one hand, brilliant and hard-driving. On the other, careless and indifferent. He had the brains and ambition to overcome being a black man in a time of black subjation in this country, and to become a lawyer, a state legislator and a congressman. And when social change and more than a bit of luck thrust him from obscu rity into the role of leader of the blacks in Chicago, he had the drive and politi cal savvy to rise to the challenge and be elected mayor. And to be re-elected. Yet, there was this other, puzzling, self-destructive side to his nature. When he first ran for mayor, much was made of his past violations of tax laws and a brief time he spent in jail for failing to file returns for several years. There were some who saw this as evi dence that he was a crook with his hand in the public till. But that wasn’t what the tax violations were about. They were about carelessness, indifference. He didn’t fail to pay taxes. The taxes had al ready been deducted from his pay- checks. It was even possible that he might have been entitled to a return if he had taken the trouble to itemize and file. But he didn’t bother. He never ex plained why. But it was as if he didn’t want to be bothered by what he consid ered trifling details. It was much the same when he tem porarily lost his law license for failing to perform legal work for clients. These were trivial cases, representing small sums of money. It was never suggested that he did it for profit. Instead, it was his tendency to neglect details, to walk away from the cluttered desk. In both these legal matters, the real victim was Washington himself. For lack ‘of attention to minor matters, he brought big troubles on himself. I doubt if we’ll ever know why there were such sharp contrasts in the mayor’s personality. Despite being a gregarious public figure, he was a very private per son. A bachelor most of his life, he had many political associates but few close friends. And those few friends aren’t in clined to say much. But it’s obvious that there were two Harold Washingtons. One, a man with the intellect and organizational skills to rise to great political heights and power. The other, a man who couldn’t or wouldn’t fill out a simple tax form and drop it in the mailbox. A man who could boast that he in tended to live long enough to be mayor of Chicago for another 20 years. And then tell his driver to stop at a fast food stand so he could wolf down a couple of greasy hamburgers that would make a doctor cringe. So I suppose that all we really know about Harold Washington is that he was human. And ever since humans got up on their hind legs, they’ve been their own worst enemies. Copyright 1987, Tribune Media Services, Inc. Opinion f Repr esentatives | The Senate and House o ^ absence ^ request the pleasure I Con gres^ from a Jo><Sessio J r/>hr - n ir‘" B or? W r>'. / iiii iilHlIi!,; She ha: other as the rair about tl sheen 1< Angela imp ’88 r life a * Jo?n t l ~ S ^u'Z C/n ‘tedStates %r ay in away fr 0 Congress 4 r tied ac mndless ive help most ev lived wit Funk eathes sh Cam This T. This 2$ >rland v [appr m A& 1 maki Oil' and alon If anyc eshmen :ular mk. Funk 1 activ Students must try to escape the horrifying ‘herd instinct appa C uncil, & taut cai The herd in stinct. It’s been bothering me for quite some time now. I see it lurk ing in every cor ner, behind every door of each room Tracy Staton Guest Columnist of every building on this campus. But I wasn’t sure anyone else noticed it — un til I went to the R.E.M. concert in G. Rollie White Coliseum. Serious thought had been banished to the back of my mind for the first time in weeks. Then Michael Stipe, the band’s lead singer, started grinding the gears in my brain. When one of his comments received the traditional Aggie hiss, Stipe was not impressed. “For all of you who just made hissing noises with your mouths, your assign ment for the weekend is to look up ‘herd politics’ because that’s what you just participated in,” Stipe said. Surpris ingly, everyone clapped. Did people clap because they know what “herd politics” means and agree with Stipe? Or did they applaud because the person next to them did because the person next to THEM did (and so on and so on)? I couldn’t decide. When I allowed serious thought to reign o’er-me again, I realized the same type of random applause occurred at the Dukakis teleconference on Nov. 15. The audience of about 800 people clapped most profusely for two of the candidate’s opinions: no Star Wars and no Contra aid. Wow. I never expected THAT from “conservative” Aggies. So, the question again: Did people clap because they oppose Star Wars and Contra aid? Do they know what Star Wars is? Do they know where Nicaragua is? Or did they applaud because the per son next to them did because the person next to THEM did (and so on and so on)? Hmmm. Well, let’s give these people the bene fit of the doubt. If they clapped because they agreed with Dukakis, there are some closet liberals — or at least semi liberals — at A&M. Why haven’t we heard from them before? My theory is that the people who don’t conform don’t speak out because they don’t want to rock the slow-but-steady conservative boat. What about the audience at R.E.M.? Let’s give them the benefit of the doubt, too. If they agreed with Stipe, they have obviously noticed this evil Presence. So it’s time to come out of the closet with my crusade to rid the world of gratu itous conformism — starting with 1 exas A&M. Realistically speaking, the crusade against the herd instinct has been strug gling in the face of overwhelming odds for several centuries. Whatever you call it — herd politics, the herd instinct, herd mentality, conformism, the band wagon phenomenon — it’s been around since tribal warfare. In 1859, John Stuart Mill’s “On Lib erty” castigated English society for blindly adhering to custom. He did not oppose custom in itself; he said “an in telligent following of custom, or even occasionally an intelligent deviation from custom, is better than blind and simply mechanical adhesion to it.” Let this be a lesson to the tradition- mongers who scream “it’s a tradition!” each time one of their sacred rituals is even questioned. Tradition has its place. But doing something just to follow cus tom, without thinking about possible consequences, is not just blind — it’s stu pid. It’s difficult to make an independent decision, especially one that may conflict with the majority. It’s much easier to go along with the crowd. As Mill says, “He who lets the world, or his own portion of it, choose his plan of life for him has no need of any other faculty than the ape like one of imitation. He who chooses his plan for himself employs all his fac ulties.” Take voting. It’s time-consuming to gather the information required to make an informed decision. It’s much easier to say “Well, Suzi likes George Bush, and my dad’s a Republican, so I’ll vote for him” or “Paul Simon has a cute bow tie — let’s vote for him.” But, as Mill says later, “But what will be his comparative worth as a human being?” What is the value of a person who acts a certain way or does certain things just because his best friend or girlfriend or boss or parents or favorite movie star does? And for those people who make it difficult for others to admit that YES, they oppose Star Wars or NO, they don’t like Madonna — Mill has even more advice. “The general average of mankind are not only moderate in intellect, but also moderate in inclinations: they have no tastes or wishes strong enough to incline them to do anything unusual, and they consequently do not understand those who have, and class all such with the wild and intemperate whom they are accustomed to look down upon, says In other words, the average perse lcom j n j “Fish ( the elps thi class, ito the; doesn’t have enough intelligence tot eccentric, and if they do, they thinkii i too much trouble. And those peopl ,&M,” who break through the barrier of mot amp w erate intellect and inclination receit only ridicule for their trouble. If this sounds vaguely like somethii Galileo experienced, it’s because he He endured the teasing of his fellowst entists because he believed the was not the center of the universe. Wk about the Wright brothers? If they In listened to their friends, we have the convenience of traveling cross country in just a few hours. I read “On Liberty” this sum® about the same time the Iran-Conti hearings started. Since the hearinj were televised, I had the opportunity! watching present-day citizens use the “ape-like faculties.” People formt opinions after watching a half-hour the hearings. Others quickly the views of friends who watched il hearings between classes in Blocker Very few people truly understot what the hearings were about. Si fewer religiously watched the hearint But by the time they were over, t® thought they were experts on the 1® Contra affair. It was bad enough when the North for president” T-shirts onto the market. But when I sav woman on CNN say “But he looks cute in his uniform!” I couldn’t takeai more. I turned off the television went back to reading my English assign ment. Respect for others’ opinions is in tant — if the opinion is carefully ceived and rooted in fact. If someo® spouts an opinion with nothing something they read on a cereal bosi substantiate it, their view does not serve respect. And if an informed opinion devia 11 from the norm, it deserves seriousc 01 sideration. It does not deserve inst® 1 dismissal to Goonville. It’s time for us to stop playing folio’ the-leader. Take a look around. If honestly agree with the status quo.doi think it’s a crime to conform. Butif) ( don’t agree, don’t be afraid to speak up Someone, somewhere will be cla| ping for you. And not just becausetl person next to them did. Tracy Staton is a senior journalism! 1 jor, photo editor and staff writer! 1 The Battalion. BLOOM COUNTY reshmai play M. This y makii "I am lain goz ic tran exas A at by Berke Breathe® OUR WHICIS IS 5TUCK fl(iP mCOULP use a ume morc WetOHT FOR TRACTION. how corn's hi. ms oom NO SNOW TAK6 T FlReS. ( £#0