The Battalion. (College Station, Tex.) 1893-current, October 23, 1987, Image 2
Page 2/The Battalion/Friday, October 23, 1987 The Battalion (USPS 045 360) Member of Texas Press Association Southwest Journalism Conference The Battalion Editorial Board Sondra Pickard, Editor John Jarvis, Managing Editor Sue Krenek, Opinion Page Editor Rodney Rather, City Editor Robbyn Lister, News Editor Loyd Brumfield, Sports Editor Tracy Staton, Photo Editor Editorial Policy The Battalion is a non-profit, self-supporting newspaper oper ated as a community service to Texas A&M and Bryan-College Sta tion. Opinions expressed in The Battalion are those of the editorial board or the author, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Texas A8cM administrators, faculty or the Board of Regents. The Battalion also serves as a laboratory newspaper for students in reporting, editing and photography classes witnin the Depart ment of Journalism. The Battalion is published Monday through Friday during Texas A&M regular semesters, except for holiday and examination periods. Mail subscriptions are $17.44 per semester, $34.62 per school year and $36.44 per full year. Advertising rates furnished on re quest. Our address: The Battalion, 216 Reed McDonald, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4111. Second class postage paid at College Station, TX 77843. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to The Battalion, 216 Reed McDonald, Texas A&M University, College Station TX 77843-4111. Pressing questions Nervous investors across the nation waited Thursday for President Reagan’s scheduled news conference. They were hop ing Reagan would soothe their fears about the jittery stock mar ket — and he may have done so. But it’s unfortunate that it took a stock market crash to get Reagan to hold his first press confer ence in seven months. The idea of a head of state meeting with the media really isn’t that unusual — it only seems so in an administration where press conferences have become all but extinct. For many jour nalists, reporting on the White House has become a race: Can you yell the question before the president gets to the plane/heli- copter/car? This journalism of the shouted question, la Sam Donaldson, has created friction between the press, the president and the public. At an awards ceremony for educators, the award recipi ents and reporters got into a shouting match, with the educators saying the press had ruined the ceremony by shouting questions. Perhaps the ceremony was ruined. But it’s important to keep in mind that the president, not the reporters, is responsible for the situation. Since the last press conference in March, negotia tors have closed in on a possible arms-control treaty with the So viet Union, the United States has begun providing protection for oil tankers in the Persian Gulf, the Iran-Contra hearings have been held, and Robert Bork has been nominated to the Su preme Court. Events such as these affect all Americans, and all Americans should want information on them. Our elected officials answer to us by way of the media. When the questions are shouted and the answers minimal, we all lose. Mail Call Education, jobs go hand-in-hand EDITOR: Brian Frederick in his Oct. 20 column about students and academic apathy makes some interesting points, but I would add that students, for their sake, need to be aware that: Education without job potential is a waste of a good mind (and pretty hard on day-to-day existence after graduation). A job without a true education could end up being just a job without a career. Therefore, I hope students will pursue both an education and a job from the first day they arrive on campus. I now regret giving insufficient attention to either while I was in college. When I graduated and finally found a job, I found myself working and corresponding with some people who had done both well. Engineers from all over the world could obliterate me at corporate- style conferences and social hours with their knowledge of literature, languages, sciences, and the American political scene. People like this are everywhere in today’s professional environment, and they’re your competition. That “job-first” or “education-first” mentality that sometimes divides a student body could stunt your ambitious future in ways you and I never imagined. M.L. Creamer graduate student A tradition unknown EDITOR: In reply to a letter submitted Oct. 21 about the “time-honored” tradition of not walking on the All Faith’s Chapel grass, we at Law Hall have this to say: The majority of the residents just across the quad from you had no idea of this tradition. We realize that it is a long way to vocalize this wish, but we feel confident that even you at Puryear can accomplish this. If we had been informed of this tradition, we would have treated it as we do all the wonderful traditions that make Texas A&M unique. Until then, Puryear, we think you should practice a little of what you so fervently preach. Jim Fisher ’90 accompanied by 65 signatures Where's the punchline? EDITOR: I have been following your new comic strip, Joe Transfer, since its introduction to The Battalion at the beginning of the semester. During these two months I have been observing several strange features of the strip, such as the lack of that part of the nose which should separate the characters’ eyes. Also, all males depicted have exaggerated muscles, and all females are quite ugly. Further, despite the Aggie tendency to be clean-shaven, most of these males have facial hair. In fact, the only clean-shaven males in the strip have even more grossly-exaggerated muscles and even more closely-squashed eyes than the rest. And, of course, none of the strips ever ends with a recognizable attempt at humor. The only logical explanation that I have deduced from all this is that the author has written one very long and extremely complicated strip which had to be broken into many installments, due to space considerations. (I see no other reason why The Battalion would still carry it.) At some future date, the author will tie all of these strange features together to create a gigantic punchline, which will probably be the talk of the toWn for months. So that all my weeks of reading the strip are not wasted. I am extremely anxious not to miss this great event. I therefore ask you to please advertise the date of the punchline in advance. Joseph Kachmar graduate student Letters to the editor should not exceed 300 words in length. The editorial staff reserves the right to edit letters for style and length, but will make every effort to maintain the author’s intent. Each letter must be signed and must include the classification, address and telephone number of the writer. Honest-.there’s not a word in here about inyokingf the Vfer Powers^ he race t< i begin if Jum No. 2 Mthem to 1 uel gambling %ut in a pr ” the Braz Lins Who i ion to the ref< nari-mutue /hereby the propor jers minus [rations an luni, if passec Jon of a] Inbling witl ie 58 of T jje that add their balk IS ’tot. b a prepa :n, co-cha on and he; ian High S< ition to the re ^Ve believe It’s too late to halt opening of long-awaited faculty club bin <n < AUSTIN (; lical Servic In February, Texas A&M faculty members finally will get a long-awaited and well-deserved treat: a club on the top two floors of Rudder Tower. The Tower Dining Center will be closed to the public and made exclusive to A&M faculty, ,;| - | < p- iif unnecessary waste of Student Government’s time. If it doesn’t trust previous faculty surveys, which included in-depth and unbiased questions, then how can Student Government expect A&M students to trust its own slanted results? st udcnt s t<ns ai cl ah ohol on campu: 1^ : , i nr l j ■said he v aren t important at this point, vvenac U, test i n g We lost. They had their; gem y. he latest a our chance They won. It’s unreasonableandimd too late to intervene in their affair: Sondra Pickard A brief explanation on the survey says the results will “assess the actual demand for a lounge/club in Rudder.” Actual means factual. The survey clearly is not based on any fact; therefore its results cannot be factual. I don’t doubt Student Govemmi! intentions are noble, but its timingd methods leave a little to he desired lii happy that the representatives of the student body are standing up for something they think is wrong,butrft now? T he formation of the facultydh administrators and their guests. The news comes as a surprise to most students, and some are shocked to discover that their beloved Tower Dining Center, with its scrumptious delicacies and scenic view of campus rooftops, soon will be a thing of the past. But, as is known, tradition dies hard at Texas A&M. In response, one student group has decided it must put a stop to this absurdity. A survey was sent to faculty members asking how they feel about the club and if they will use it when it opens. As one professor put it, the survey is nothing but a “skewed instrument.” The same professor went on to say he hoped such a survey wasn’t prepared by someone from Texas A&M, especially not someone “professionally engaged in research.” No need to worry, sir. The survey was not the work of professionals, but rather a belated reaction by Student Government to stop something that has been in the making for years. Why the survey’s authors failed to identify themselves on their own survey is obvious — I wouldn’t put my name on it either. The survey ventures to ask faculty members 10 questions that are, for the most part, biased. The survey is labeled “Demand for Faculty Club in Rudder Tower Survey.” This alone says Student Government didn’t do its homework. Over the past 12 years — and probably well before that— faculty members have indicated they wanted such a club. Besides the most recent survey conducted by the Faculty Senate, several others have revealed that there is an obvious and clear-cut desire for an A&M faculty club. Conducting another survey is an One question asks if faculty are aware of the limited parking area surrounding Rudder Tower. This question is completely unrelated to whether there is a demand for a faculty club. didn’t just happen overnight. There*: nothing sudden about it. It studentski wanted to intervene on the facultvs attempts, they should have ago. gland win lx Ijlic, EMS D Police on W MS supervi: Bids of ma Bvis.The ai Bnicians we .ndercover pi Police said Besides, faculty will use the club mainly during the day. Most will choose to walk, and those who drive either will have to park in a nearby staff lot or park illegally. And the faculty are aware of the parking problem on campus. They have to deal with it every day, just as we do. This shouldn’t stop them from having a faculty club. Details were initiated and workede early last year in a series of Faculty Senate meetings, all of which wereopc to the public, all of which should hart been attended by a Student Senate representative. Another question asks, “On a traditionally dry campus, are you in favor of the selling of alcohol in the club/lounge?” The club has long since been approved by the Board of Regents^ President Frank E. Vandiver. The Faculty Club’s application for incorporation was signed Thursday. The question first should have asked if the faculty member was in favor of a dry campus to begin with. The tradition word was unnecessary, but as inevitable as always. Student Government might just discover that not everyone at A&M is keen on tradition and not everyone is keen on having a dry campus. According to System policy,alcokol can only be served in leased roornsor areas, and the club must becomealtj entity to sign a liquor license. TheBtf originally implemented the leasing policy years ago so lessees of KyleFiti stadium boxes could have alcohol ^ faculty have taken all of the necessan steps to get what most major Universities had long ago. In previous years, the issue of having a pub in the MSC has come before the Student Senate more than once but has been defeated by students because students favor a dry campus. The members of the faculty decided long ago they would like alcohol available in their club. Without it, a faculty club/lounge just wouldn’t be a club/lounge. Serving alcohol to adults on a University campus is harmless. The moral and ethical feelings of A&M And what about Rudder TowerH |; nice place, but I won’t miss it. fi there about three times in thefiveyt’ 1 that I’ve been here. But those whot 1 :’ the Tower Dining Center should consider themselves lucky they were able to use it as long as they did. Gen. Earl Rudder originally inte^ that the tower’s top floor beuseda^ bar for A&M faculty members. Sondra Pickard is a senior joum^' major and editor of The Battalion BLOOM COUNTY by Berke Breathi / // vn