The Battalion. (College Station, Tex.) 1893-current, April 01, 1986, Image 2
Page 2/The Battalion/Tuesday, April 1, 1986 Opinion Batt endorses Cleary After interviewing the five candidates for student body pres ident — Marty Roos, Brett Shine, Mike Sims, Mike Hachtman and Jim Cleary — we unanimously agreed on only one thing: All five were qualified for the position. Each of the candidates had concrete ideas on ways to make life better for Texas A&M students. Each wanted better student communication with the Board of Regents and had ideas for re forming Student Government. But after serious and sometimes heated discussion, we de cided on the person who we felt had the experience and lead ership qualities Student Government and the students need — Jim Cleary. Cleary currently serves as vice president for academic affairs in the Student Senate and as student representative on the pro vost search committee. By serving in these positions, we feel he has opened channels of communication with faculty and administration. We also feel he has the dedication and assertiveness to accomplish the goals he has set for himself and Student Government. Among Cleary’s ideas are making teacher evaluations avail able to students and getting rid of the non-productive rules and personnel in Student Government. Jim Cleary has the dedication and determination to lead Stu dent Government to a more active role in voicing the opinions of the student body. The Battalion Editorial Board United Feature Syndicate MAftGULIES ©1966 HCV6TDN POST a rest; inspec Brazos ent. on ft inspec id Jel rian at rants gene lions < ys rest or lo violatii iv- ” • - Prostitution turns people into controlled commodities I eqc Int dec! The last time I taped columnist James}. K i 1 p a - trick’s mug shot to my dart board was in 1983, after he wrote a piece ad- vocating high school and college newspapers as lap- dogs of the admin istration. Loren Steffy Now Kilpatrick’s picture once again is gracing my bull’s-eye. Last week, Kilpa trick advocated legalizing prostitution. “The law has enough to worry about without worrying over discreet sexual relations between consenting adults .... Let’s let the ancient law of supply and demand quietly accommodate the oldest profession in the world.” Kilpatrick’s idea is based on the con clusions of an Atlanta committee that determined “Prostitutes in Atlanta should be allowed to work out of escort services, bars and hotels, as long as they do so discreetly and stay off the streets.” The committee stated that prostitu tion should be decriminalized and hook ers periodically tested for diseases. The disease-testing idea is nothing new. In Nevada, house prostitution is legal in most counties. The “working women” are fingerprinted and routinely checked by public health officials. But house owners collect 50 to 60 percent of the earnings and the basic per customer charge is low. Even in this legal arrange ment, prostitutes are a controlled com modity, not human beings. The Atlanta committee also sug gested that because licensed escort serv ices would have to pay taxes, everyone in the city could benefit from prostitu tion. Everyone, of course, except the prostitutes themselves. Many hookers who work out of bars must pay the man ager a sizeble chunk of their profits. Others must encourage their customers to drink, thus running up the bar’s prof its. Of course, then the owner would have to pay more taxes. . . . It sounds good in theory, but many “escort services” are linked to organized crime, which is not known for responsi ble tax-paying. Legalizing prostitution and collecting taxes on it means a city would be endorsing sexual solicitation of men, women and children. I have a difficult time being thankful for the city repairing the sidewalk in front of my house if the money was generated by ex ploiting women. still spend most of their time ensuring that “illegal” streetwalkers don’t peddle their wares in the public domain. Kilpatrick’s assertion that the law has better things to do is wrong. The most common arrangement for a prostitute’s services is the pimp system. Many of these relationships are based not on a monetary agreement but on a coerced psychological dependence in which the hooker is an exploited victim. The other problem with Kilpatrick’s theory is the idea of “consenting adults.” Most prostitutes don’t start out as adults, and almost none of them are “consenting” at first. The drift into prostitution usually starts in childhood with the development of a negative self- image. What follows is sexual exploita tion, including molestation, incest or rape. Eventually, the child accepts the image of herself as a hooker. turned to when other alternativesarei netime ther not feasible or not available. Thi lustbe who do choose the world’s oldestproi sion as their career usually areaddki ^ghtr to drugs and/or alcohol and havei on , 1 other way to maintain their habits. 1ft these people need is help, not a la government supporting the actions their employers/abusers. repo aint (n (majc ent n bout e Maybe all these deficiencies witliJ galized prostitution can be takencarej by a clever lawmaker. But thisi . RIO The law spends more time fighting this type of prostitution than the subtler forms. Call girls, the upper crust of the prostitution hierarchy, are rarely ar rested. So even if prostitutes were re stricted to bars and hotels, police would And juvenile courts don’t steer way ward children in the right direction, they only enhance the problem. Adoles cents usually learn the fundamentals of their trade and frequently meet juvenile pimps while under juvenile court juris diction. has a basic moral concept that sell your body for material gain is wd The act in question doesn’t changewl the environment, the status ofds prietor or the cost of the service. ed and lying < indent For most young men and women, prostitution is not their “career,” it’s a temporary means of survival, a quick an swer to their social and economic needs, Kilpatrick is right, within hislimitf frame of mind. The law does have ter things to do than worry aboutsen relations between consenting adults only prostitution were that simple. Loren Steffy is a junior journalism jor and the Opinion Page editorI: The Battalion. y troop plane rce pi ,nd tv Imelda’s secret shoe stash: fixation or Sherlock Holmes was study ing the newspa per. “No matter where one goes to track down the se cret of the Marcos fortune, the trail always leads back to the shoes.” “Why is that?” I Aft BuchWOld asked him. “I’m not sure, Watson. Let’s see what we know already. Imelda had 3,200 pairs of size 8 shoes in her closet, most of which had never been worn. Why, Watson, why?” “Suppose Ferdinand Marcos had a foot fetish. Many men with power do.” “It’s too easy, Watson. Even someone with an extreme foot fixation could never go through 3,200 pairs.” “I’ve known people with fetishes who went through a pair of new shoes every day. Perhaps Ferdinand was one of them.” “I’ve checked around at the palace. No one ever saw Marcos playing with Imelda’s shoes.” “Well then, Sherlock, maybe Imelda was the one who had a foot fetish.” Sherlock smiled as he usually does when he’s caught me. “Wrong, Watson. Not a foot fetish. If anything, Imelda had a shoe fetish.” “What is a shoe fetish?” “It’s a compulsion to hold and caress a piece of footwear to assuage your guilt.” “And what causes one to have the fe tish?” “We’re not sure. All we know is that many people who have a shoe fetish also have a numbered bank account in Swit zerland.” “It’s all starting to come together, Sherlock. Imelda bought shoes on her trips abroad to disguise the fact she was opening numbered bank accounts.” “Just the opposite, my dear Watson. Imelda opened numbered bank ac counts abroad to disguise the fact she was buying shoes.” “Of course,” I said. “But why?” “Imelda had a very deprived child hood. The money she sent out of the country was to assure her that no matter what happened to the Philippine gov ernment, she would always have some thing to wear to the ball.” “But, Sherlock, we’re talking about $3 billion. Are you trying to tell me that all this money was set aside for footwear?” “Have you priced women’s shoes la tely, Watson?” “That’s all well and good. But sup pose Imelda had stocked up on the shoes so that when she was booted out of Manila she could open her own store in Honolulu.” “Take a look at this photo. Does Imelda look like somebody who would work in a shoe store?” “Probably not. But she could own it and not work there.” “Except for one thing, Watson. All the shoes are size 8. You can’t open a store where all the footwear is the same size.” “Hmmmn. Well, tell me, Sherlock, does solving the shoe enigma help you solve the problem of where the Phil ippine treasury is?” Use your heads EDITOR: Once again The Battalion Editorial Board, that infamous group, has left me wondering about its mentality. I am responding to the Mar. 24 editorial “A Cloudy Response.” In it they praised the Soviet Union for their “self-imposed, unilateral test ban on nuclear weapons,” and shamed the Untied States for recently testing a nuclear weapon. Sure the Soviets want a test ban on nuclear weapons because they have already achieved a healthy advantage in this area and they would like to maintain it. This same article also praised the Soviet Union for their intentions of peace and stability. Do the Soviets support radical regimes like Libya and Syria who export terrorism in the name of peace? Do they invade Afganistan in the name of peace? Do they fortify their borders with free countries with hundreds of thousands of tanks and other military hardware in the name of peace? No, the Soviet Union’s long range intentions are not of peace and stability, but of world domination and the spx ead of Communism. So before writing - Mail Call — your next liberal, naive article please use your heads and think about what you are writing. Blaine Gillcoat ’87 GSS anniversary EDITOR: A year ago, the Supreme Court, by refusing to hear Texas A&M’s appeal, forced the University to finally recognize Gay Student Services. Since then, our former “foes” — the adminstration — have done all they can to make our recognition painless. It’s good to be able to work with the University. The other students have been mostly complacent. Perhaps they support our right to be here, or they realize that we ARE here, whether they like it or not. Whatever the reason, the GSS is not the controversial subject it used to be. Phis week is Gay Week at Texas A&rM. GSS is celebrating its first year on campus. It is also commemorating 10 years of service to Aggies. Saturday is the 10th anniversary of our original application for recognition. Kevin McLeod Bailey Secretary of GSS Well-lighted books EDITOR: On Mar. 18, during spring break, I happened to walk by the Evans library about 8 p.m., and much to my disbelief EVERY SINGLE LIGHT WAS ON. T here was not a soul to be seen inside, not even the janatorial staff. But here were all these brightly lit books. It makes you wonder how the University, according to a quote by President Vandiver in The Battalion Mar. 25, is “doing everything to contain costs.” I know I feel pretty good knowing that my increased tuition and decreased financial aid is making sure that all the books in Evans library don’t have to be af raid of the dark. David Fuller Letters to the Editor should not exceed 300 words in length. The editorial staff reserves the right to edit letters for style and length but will make every effort to maintain the author’s intent. Each letter must he signed and must include the address and telephone number of the writer. front? No- Bl “Not necessarily. A lot of it is hid in real estate, gold, jewelry, bands legitimate companies that Maid bought when he was riding high, that has surfaced are the shoes.” “Quite. Say what you will, Sherlof the Marcoses always covered tracks.” “Watson, I would liketogobai take one more look at Imelda’s closet “Why, Sherlock?” “The Marcoses had a dog guardi their clothes. On the night theysneai out of the palace the dog did not to Why not, Watson?” “Why, Sherlock?” “Elementafy. The dog had a his mouth.” Art Buchwald is a columnist for Los Angeles Times Syndicate. The Battalion (USPS 045 360) Member of Texas Press Association Southwest Journalism Conference The Battalion Editorial Board Michelle Powe, Editor Kay Mallett, Managing Editor Loren Steffy, Opinion Page Editor Jerry Oslin, City Editor Cathie Anderson, News Editors Travis Tingle, Sports Editor ea This bas or Editorial Policy The Battalion is a non-piotit. scli'-suppoilinffndr. pet operated as a ctunninoity set vice u> Texas A&N* Bi \ a/1-College Station. Opinions expressed in The Battalion arc those olV Editorial Board or the author, and do not necessarihtf. resent the opinions of Texas A&M administratorsJ* 1 * I or the Board of Regents. The Battalion also serves as a lahniaion newspiptt students in reporting, editing and phototftapln d* within the Department ot'Conununiculiom. United Press International is entitled cxclusiveh lo'i use Tor reproduction of all news dispatches a editedH' 1 Rights of reproduction of all other matter herein * served. The Battalion is published Monday through ft# din ing Texas A&M t egular semesters, except forholfij and examination pet iods. Mail subscriptions are Sib 1 pet semester. $33.25 pet school rear and $35 per 1 y ear. Advet tising rates furnished on request. Our address: The Battalion. 216 Reed Me Building. Texas A&M University. College Station. 77843. Second class postage paid at College Station. TX770 POS TMAS TER: Send address changes to The Ban* ion, 216 Reed McDonald. Texas A&M L'Diversity Colkf Station TX 77843.