Page 2/The Battalion/Thursday August 1, 1985 Brazil's giant leap Censorship. It puts fear into artists’ hearts and drowns cre ativity. Some consider it one of the worst crimes a human being can commit — the murder of ideas. Many communist and military governments have censored everything from journalism and communications to art and mu sic. One government — Brazil — has finally decided to let its creative juices flow. Brazilian Justice Minister Fernando Lyra announced Monday that “Censorship is hereby extinct,” at least for that country. For 21 years its military government inhibited authors, film makers, composers and actors. Between 1979 and 1985, Gen. Joao Figueiredo held a loose rein on censorship, but freedom of expression wasn’t guaranteed. Lyra’s announcement is an important step for the people of Brazil. Not only will artistic endeavors be unrestricted, but other vital public services such as newspapers will be unhampered. The plight of Brazilian artists may seem far removed from the campus of Texas A&M. But as journalists, we are bothered by censorship no matter where it occurs. Anyone who enjoys the privilege of free expression and the benefits that accompany it should be equally concerned. Brazil has taken a big step toward the free exchange of ideas that we already enjoy. We hope Other countries will follow its ex ample. The Battalion Editorial Board Mail Call Letters to the Editor should not exceed 300 words in length. The editorial staff reserves the right to edit letters for style and length but will make every effort to maintain the author’s intent. Each letter must be signed and must include the address and telephone number of the writer. Evangelism, nazism not comparable EDITOR: On July 29 and 30 KAMU-FM broad cast two National Public Radio pro grams (“Morning Edition” and “All Things Considered”) which considered the rise of neo-nazism in the United States. vented wisdom, compassion, discipline, and understanding upon which good morals and upstanding character are based! It also says (numerous times) that only through a relationship with God through Jesus Christ can one reach his or her full potential, have the most abundant life possible and have eternal life after death. : JF In a number of statements the report ers equated this movement with funda mental or evangelical Christianity. Such identification is, at best, irresponsible reporting suggesting a lack of under standing of true Christianity. The choice is clear: we can either choose to believe what the Bible has to say or we can reject it. There is no ground in between. It is certainly an injustice to those who are truly fundamental evangelical Christians for groups such as Posse Cometas, The Order, The Arian Na tion, etc. to be associated with the theo logically conservative church. If you heard these broadcasts and would like to express your opinion concerning the nature of the reporting, I suggest that you write the editors of the respective programs. People wonder why teenage suicide, drug abuse and divorce are on the rise. The answer is very simple: we live in a society which, for the most part, has re jected God’s word (the Bible) and His interest in and authority over our lives. In America of the 1980’s, what is right today may not be considered right tomorrow; what was wrong last year is accepted now because the latest socio logical belief condones it. How utterly wrong this is. How confusing it is to America’s children! Morning Edition: National Public Ra dio Attn: Jay Kernis 2025 M Street NW Washington, D.C. 20036 In light of this, we applaud the Boy Scouts on their principle that young men in their ranks should believe in God. All Things Considered: National Public Radio Attn: Ted Clark 2025 M Street NW Washington, D.C. 20036 You may also call NPR at (800) 822- 2300 or (202) 822-2323. Bob DeOtte Moral character related to God EDITOR: We disagree with your July 23rd edi torial, “Where does belief in God enter in?” You state that “The Boy Scouts pre sents itself as an organization which pro motes beneficial and moral characteris tics in boys, not as a group that advocates certain religious beliefs.” Message of special Aggie unraveled EDITOR: In contrast to your opinion, we main tain that moral character is directly re lated to one’s spiritual beliefs. Indeed, belief in God has everything to do with good moral character, true self-confi dence and leadership. We need to turn no further than the Bible to see that God loves us and is in terested in every detail of our lives — in cluding how children are raised and the character qualities He wants them to take on as they mature. I am writing you because I was having trouble understanding why things turned out as they did. Although I really tried to figure it out on my own, it has taken until now, almost two months later, to see what a very special Aggie was showing me. I thought it needed to be shared with someone. MARGUUES HOt^TDN fVST United Feature Syndicate Are woman’s ‘lot of difficulties’ worth $30 million in damages? Al The 1 Midlan new Ti which f and pr tary an The Try to imagine how much $30 million is. Imagine how many things you could buy with that much money. The num- ber of cars, houses, boats or planes. Jewels, furs, college edu cations — do any Cheryl Clark In your conclusion, you state that toying with boys’ lives is a rotten way to prepare America’s leaders of tomor row.” In contrast, we insist that “the fool has said in his heart, ’there is no God”” (Psalm 14:1) and that, to prepare to morrows leaders, we must “train up a child in the way he should go, even when he is old he will not depart from it.” (Proverbs 22:6) Mike Foarde ’86 Willis Hudson ’83 Gary Squyres ’83 Charlie Stimson ’83 of those things cost $30 million? A 23-year-old Matagorda County woman was recently awarded $30 mil lion in an out-of-court settlement for the deaths of her husband and two chil dren in a trailer fire. The woman’s suit claimed Enterprise Products Co., a gas refinery, and Par- agas Inc., which distributes propane, were responsible for a fire that killed her husband and her two children in their trailer house in 1982. The accident was blamed on failure to odorize the gas as required by state law. I know you can’t put a value on a hu man life. I know you can’t say the deaths of her husband and her t\Vo children are worth a specific amou nt of money. I know the woman has suffered from the deaths of her husband and* the two children. But $30 million worth? The case was settled out of court. The defendants didn’t try to contest the suit. They implied they might have been at fault in some way and probably couldn’t win the suit if they tried. The attorneys for the two companies said the reason they settled out of court was to save their clients any additional legal fees. But if someone was suing you for $30 million, wouldn’t you at least put up some argument? The lawyer for the woman said she had suffered “lots of difficulties” since the accident. But $30 million worth of difficulties? The woman wasn’t physically hurt in the accident. She didn’t suffer any crip pling injuries. Judging from the article she still seems to be able to function in a normal fashion. In fact, after the verdict was given, the woman couldn’t be reached for comment because she was shopping for a pickup truck. A pickup truck? The woman will be awarded $20,000 a month for the next 30 years and she’s shopping for a pickup truck? The lawyer for the woman said the money to pay the settlement will come from the insurance policies for the com panies. He added that both companies are each worth hundreds of millions of dollars. So it can be assumed the de fend nts and their respective insurance companies can handle the settlement. How do you think the insurance com panies are going to be able to pay the settlement? The companies will charge a higher premium to the gas companies. How will the gas companies be able to pay this higher premium? They will charge the consumers more money. Nice little circle, huh? A nice $30 million circle. to pay court costs or did the lawyei charge a flat rate out of the goodm of his heart? I can understand suing for that amount of money if the woman was injured in the accident and required expensive medical treatment for the rest of her life. I can understand if the woman required the money for area son other just to perhaps see hon much she could get. I can understand if she had sued for a lesser amount to pay for the difficulties she suffered year b System Erland ministi vide ti richme been s r But what is she going to do withaiif that money? I know it’s everyone’s right to sueij they want. There are legitimate real sons to sue. But so many people atti abusing the right to sue for the faultolj others, it’s hurting everyone in thet end. Insurance companies will chargr higher premiums to the companies the companies will pass the cost tothe ! consumers. vio mil qui