The Battalion. (College Station, Tex.) 1893-current, April 29, 1983, Image 2
Page 2/The Battalion/Friday, April 29, 1983 i s |j! 11 n . i i i [i ■ i ■ ! ' I ! I ; t \ i! i, i i i opinion Robots don’t wear sneakers by Art Buchwald Widget was very excited and told me to come over to his sneaker factory right away. “I just hired my first robot system, and 1 want you to see it.” The gate to the factory was closed, but when I drove up to it a voice, almost human, said: “Can I help you?” “I’m here to see Mr. Widget,” and I gave my name. In 10 seconds the voice responded: “You may drive to the main building and park in the visitor’s slot number two.” Widget was waiting at the door, all smiles. He put a plastic card into a slot, a door opened, and we walked into his fac tory. There wasn’t a human being in sight, but sneakers were flying off the assembly line and being stuffed into boxes. “IT’S PRETTY NOISY,” I said. “DOESN’T BOTHER THE ROBOTS,” Widget yelled. “THEY DON’T KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MACHINE NOISE AND MUZAK.” We went up some stairs to a glass- enclosed booth. When Widget shut the door he said, “I want you to meet my Master Robot, Turnbill. He is programmed to program the robots on the floor.” Turnbill gave me a steely look and re luctantly put out his arm which I shook. “How many sneakers did we make to day, Turnbill?” Widget asked. Turnbill’s lights blinked, and deep voice said, “12,890.” Widget rubbed his hands. “I used to make that many in a week. And I had to pay overtime for three shifts. Now I can manufacture the same number in a day, and I don’t even have to worry about the robots taking coffee breaks. No social security, not health care payments, no pensions,” Widget said, patting Turn- bill’s back. “And every one of my robots is tax-depreciable, which is more than I could say for my ex-workers.” Turnbill started spitting out a readout. “Glitch on shoelace hole maker, third robot malfunctioning on line one.” Widget said: “It would have taken me a month to find out who was screwing up my shoelace holes if I had a human being on the line. Now I know in a matter of seconds.” “What will you do?” “We’ll dump him, and replace him with a robot who can do the job. The sneaker union would never allow me to fire anybody, no matter how bad the per son was screwing up my shoes. Nice work, Turnbill. I’m going to make you a vice president.” “Thank you, sir,” Turnbill’s voice synthesizer said. “Any decision on an assistant microprocessor to help me in packaging?” “I’m taking it up with the board next week, Turnbill. As I told you, the board has ordered me to put a freeze on buying new microprocessors.” “Why is that?” I asked. “We’re making more sneakers than we ever made before. But we can’t seem to sell them.” “Maybe the reason is that robots don’t wear sneakers.” “What does that mean?” “Well, you’ve laid off your workers and now they don’t have money to buy sneakers.” “There are lots of workers in other factories that need sneakers.” “Yes, but they’re being replaced by robots as well. Robots are great for what they do, but they’re lousy consumers.” Widget looked over at Turnbill ner vously. “Don’t talk so loud,” he whis pered to me. “I don’t care,” I said. “This country’s success was based on the fact that the people who made our products could afford to buy them. You’ve replaced your workers with robots and you’re saving a fortune in salaries, but you’re now up to your ears in sneakers.” “But if I don’t have robots making my sneakers, I can’t afford to compete with the sneakers that are being imported from abroad,” Widget said tearfully. “What should I do?” “Why don’t you ask Turnbill?” Widget hit several buttons on Turn- bill’s head. Turnbill blinked several times and then said, “I’m sorry, I’m in production — not sales.” Letters: Central American situation Editor: RE: Letter to the Battalion, “Reagan and El Salvador” of April 26: The authors of this letter made allusions to the ‘domino theory’ and the ‘red scare’ in reference to El Salvador, which de monstrated the authors’ 50s mentality. Moreover, such talk in relation to El Sal vador shows that the authors of this letter have failed to realize the full scope of the Berry's World ‘7 still like ‘Rocky /' best!” situation in Central America. First, that the Salvadorian guerillas are Soviet-supported is a debatable issue. Not a single photograph exists of a Salva dorian guerilla with a Russian-made gun. Instead, they carry American-made guns captured from government forces. The Reagan administration has failed to sup port the idea that Salvadorian rebels are Soviet-supported. Second, that the 1.5 million people who live in El Salvador are undemocra- tically and horribly repressed by a fascist, military, American-supported govern ment is undoubted by people who have studied the situation. Recent “reforms” are nothing but cosmetic, unreal changes which allow conservative, pro-corporate U.S. interests to continue to exert its in fluence in banana republics like El Sal vador. Finally, without going into the detail which this issue deserves, the El Salvado rian regime has a history of immoral, profit-motivated, undemocratic, oppres sive and repressive tendencies to such an extent as has never been exceeded. How can Reagan apologists stand aghast at the supposed oppression in Poland while ignoring the atrocities committed in El Salvador, paid for with taxpayer’s money. How can socio-politically aware Americans allow more money to be spent in El Salvador while cutting social welfare programs which benefit the American people? Gregory A. Graybill Graduate Student A&M conservativism Editor: In Tuesday’s Battalion, Joe Jordan said that conservatism is a weakness of Texas A&M. I wonder Joe if you have seen the report released in Washington yesterday that details what liberalism has done for our public school system? Is that what you want for A&M? Texas A&M is a great University be cause Aggies have historically believed in the principles set down by great men like Jefferson, Franklin and Washington (all conservatives). If we Aggies allow people like Joe Jordan to turn A&M into a “liber al institution” patterned on the beliefs of scum like Teddy Kennedy, then we’ll de serve the mediocrity that will ensue. Richard H. Fosberg ’78 Howdy Editor: The “Howdy” tradition is now dead — Shall we hold Silver Taps for it? Cathy Carswell ’83 Slouch By Jim Ear 1 Combin u|d wit work “/ want to explain why I've been absent the last two weeks, and why I haven't been turning in my work, and why I didn't take two make-up tests; but most of all I want to talk about my chances of making a B this semester if I finish strong.** kts, fo Itinevei 1— it btvd or fart I at ihy, bi I a re ellearne |uey ; ling g' oft'ssioi Hand ; lulking Heated Biopria Be Met didn’t st Igh- I •' ■tin (> ■’and Ht fin a jtce to lil Hk to Hge. ■lose ( Struggling for powe at the White House m Enc’lmi£ Hilar \v by Helen Thomas United Press International WASHINGTON — The pulls for the political heart and soul of President Reagan are often highlighted by the feuding among his top aides. The troika of top aides, including chief of staff James Baker, deputy chief Michael Deaver and counselor Edwin Meese seemed to be content with collec tive leadership at the outset of the Reagan administration. But soon the different styles of Baker and Meese came into focus, and specula tion centered on who was on top; who had the president’s ear. Baker was in charge of domestic policy and Meese was to oversee foreign policy — with no broad experience in that field. In places like the White House, jock eying for power and more power is not unusual. Many fall by the wayside in the struggle. However, one veteran observer said: “I’ve never seen it this bad before.” The Baker and Meese split became apparent in the summer of 1981 when Meese, who was overseeing foreign poli cy, did not think it was important to wake up the president when U.S. planes shot down two Libyan jets over Mediterra nean waters. Meese also was away from the White House on speechmaking trips that kept him out of touch. At that time, turf bat tles began to emerge between Secretary of State Alexander Haig and Richard Allen, the national security affairs advis er. Haig also feuded with Baker, passing the word that he thought Baker was con ducting a “guerrilla campaign” against him. Haig’s complaints became too much for Reagan. So he had to go, but he is still smarting from his downfall. Allen fell by the wayside for other reasons. I he rift between BakerandMi dramatized when they gave up iheiil breakfast sessions and decided if only as needed. They each have! access to the Oval Office, and: where it counts. But their different! barely hidden. Now' comes national securityi adviser William Clark, whoissfc equal power and equal accesstoto Clark and Baker have split on,v ber of issues, particularly on how it with Congress on controversialadi t rat ion proposals. Clark, like De Secretary Caspar Weinberger,* go to the mat on the hard-line issues as a 10 percent increase in d spending. Baker, who is more of a Wasti pro, seeks to moderate and to con ise so that the administration will! to achieve bipartisan support. Laif in the case of the 1984 budget,It been waging a losing battle, id I Clark and Meese have beenassoe with Reagan since his Californiaf natorial days. They made the lonjr with the president to the WhiteN and they brought with them theft: vative ideology that they believeis representative of Reagan. They also stay in touch with com live groups who have been outfoi er’s scalp since he joined the fo team. Baker was Vice President ft Bush’s campaign manager resents the more middle-of-theroat tage of Republicans who annoy: members on the right. “This too shall pass” is the way 1: feels about being on target. Reagan remains above the fra) hoping this too will pass. When asked why he was kepi® dark about intramural feuding his key aides, White House spol i said h Larry Speakes said: ‘‘Who: The Battalion USPS 045 360 Member ot Texas Press Association , Southwest Journalism Conference Editor Diana Sultenfuss Managing Editor .~ Gary Barker Associate Editor Denise Richter City Editor Hope E. Paasch Assistant City Editor Beverly Hamilton Sports Editor John Wagner Assistant Sports Editor John Lopez Entertainment Editor Colette Hutchings Assistant Entertainment Editor. . .. Diane Yount News Editors Daran Bishop, Brian Boyer, Jennifer Carr, Elaine Engstrom, Shelley Hoekstra, Johna Jo Maurer, Jan Swaner, Jan Werner, Rebeca I Zimmermann Staff Writers Melissa Adair, Maureen Carmody, Frank Christlieb, Connie Edelmon, Scott Griffin, Patrice Koranek, Robert McGlohon, Ann Ramsbottom, Kim Schmidt, Karen Schrimsher, Patti Schwierzke, Kelley Smith, Angel i Stokes, Joe Tindel, Tracey Taylor, i Kathy Wiesepape Cartoonist Scott McCulfar Graphic Artists Sergio Galvez Thompson, Fernando Andrade Photographers David Fisher, Guy Hood, Eric Lee, Irene Mees, Barry Papke, William Schulz Editorial Policy The Battalion is a non-profit, self-supporting news paper operated as a community service toi$ University and Bryan-College Station. Opi^ pressed in The Battalion are those of the cdi^ hor, and do not necessarily represent thto^ i ex as A&M University administrators or hoi' ha s, or of the Board of Regents. The Battalion also serves as a laboratontP'' for students in reporting, editing and photofip' scs within the Department of CommunialK®. 1 Questions or comments concerning wf matter should be directed to the editor. Letters Policy Letters to the Editor should notexcecdlW length, and are subject to being cut if iheyart 1 The editorial staff reserves the right to edii W style and length, but will make every eflortto^ the author’s intent. Each letter must also btsif*) show the address and phone number of the l,fl, Columns and guest editorials are also wl# are not subject to the same length constraint!^ Address all inquiries and correspondence tf ' The Battalion, 216 Reed McDonald, Texas A versity, College Station, TX 77843,orphontW 2611. The Battalion is published daily duringTe'* fall and spring semesters, except for holidayai»^ nation periods. Mail suliscriptionsare$16"lf)) ter, $33.25 per school yearandlSSperfullyeat ‘ tising rates furnished on request. Our address: The Battalion, 216Reed!! Building, Texas A&M University, College$O 0(t 77843. United Press International is entitledexdt®') the use for reproduction of all newsdi to it. Rights of reproduction of all other maiiet ' reserved. Second class postage paid at College Su^j 77843. ,