The Battalion. (College Station, Tex.) 1893-current, January 31, 1983, Image 2
opinion January 31, !i Slouch By Jim Earle Changes in Senate needed operation by Steve Gerstel United Press International WASHINGTON — Sen. David Pryor of Arkansas husbands his words with great care, which, just by itself, makes them worthy of consideration. As last year’s “lame duck” session fin ally staggered toward a close, he chose to unburden himself, putting into words a feeling that must have been shared by most — if not all — of his colleagues. In effect, the first-term Arkansas Democrat said the way the Senate oper ates is an ungodly mess and the “lame duck” session made the situation even worse. “Mr. President, shame, disgust and ridicule have been visited upon this body,” Pryor declared. “Americans are bewildered and sick ened by the way we have made a mockery of a once-revered institution,” he said. “We have no reason for pride as we slink out of this city.” He blamed neither the Senate leaders nor the Senate’s members but the Sen ate’s “method of doing business.” “In an age of high technology and in stant change, the Senate continues to em ploy obsolete and clumsy procedures,” Pryor charged. “Instead of lifting off like the space shuttle Columbia, it pokes along at the pace of a one-horse shay.” Pryor did not limit himself to com plaint but made specific recommenda tions that would enable the Senate to op erate and escape what seems to be a per petual stalemate. For a starter, Pryor recommended stricter enforcement of “germaness,” permitting only amendments relevant to the bill under consideration. At matters stand now, there is a no-holdsbarred rule, which allows any and all proposals to come before the Senate. Pryor also called for an absolute end to the “gentleman’s agreement” under which one senator can put a “hold” on a Take another example. The two party leaders appointed a panel on Jan. 3 to study ways to change the rules. The bipartisan group has not yet met. A serious “germaness” rule would run into heavy opposition from senators who fear their pet projects may never get a vote — except as a rider to a bill destined for the White House. Eliiinination of the “hold” provision — especially on nominations — would run counter to the gentlemens’ club atmos phere, a state of mind considered very conducive to getting anything done in the Senate. It did, however, get badly frayed during the “lame duck” session. And any tinkering with the filibuster rule — as the last 20 years has shown — comes only at the expense of a bloodbath on the Senate floor. The Battalion USPS 045 360 Member ot Texas Press Association Southwest Journalism Conference Editor Diana Sultenfuss Managing Editor Gary Barker Associate Editor Denise Richter City Editor Hope E. Paasch Assistant City Editor Beverly Hamilton Sports Editor John Wagner Entertainment Editor Colette Hutchings Assistant Entertainment Editor . . . . Diane Yount News Editors Daran Bishop, Jennifer 4 Carr, Elaine Engstrom, JohnaJo Maurer, Jan Werner, Rebeca Zimmermann Staff Writers Maureen Carmody, Frank Christlieb, Patrice Koranek, John Lopez, Robert McGlohon, Ann Ramsbottom, Kim Schmidt, Patti Schwierzke, Kelley Smith, Angel Stokes, Tracey Taylor, Joe Tindel Copy editors Jan Swaner, Chris Thayer Cartoonist Scott McCullar Graphic Artist Pam Starasinic Photographers David Fisher, Jorge Casari, Ronald W. Emerson, Octavio Garcia, Rob Johnston, Irene Mees Editorial Policy The Battalion is a non-profit, self-supporting news paper operated as a community service to Texas A&M University and Bryan-College Station. Opinions ex pressed in The Battalion are those of the editor or the author, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Texas A&M University administrators or faculty mem bers, or of the Board of Regents. The Battalion also serves as a laboratory newspaper for students in reporting, editing and photography clas ses within the Department of Communications. Questions or comments concerning any editorial matter should be directed to the editor. Letters Policy Letters to the Editor should not exceed 300 words in length, and are subject to being cut if they are longer. The editorial staff reserves the right to edit letters for style and length, but will make every effort to maintain the author’s intent. Each letter must also be signed and show the address and phone number of the writer. Columns and guest editorials are also welcome, and are not subject to the same length constraints as letters. Address all inquiries and correspondence to: Editor, The Battalion, 216 Reed McDonald, Texas A&M Uni versity, College Station, TX 77843, or phone (713) 845- 2611. The Battalion is published daily during Texas A&M’s fall and spring semesters, except for holiday and exami nation periods. Mail subscriptions are $ 16.75 per semes ter, $33.25 per school year and $35 per full year. Adver tising rates furnished on request. Our address: The Battalion, 216 Reed McDonald Building, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843. United Press International is entitled exclusively to the use for reproduction of all news dispatches credited to it. Rights of reproduction of all other matter herein reserved. Second class postage paid at College Station, TX 77843. Playing for all the arms chips ,egi by Art Buchwald The trouble with disarmament talks is that every time one side suggests some thing, the other side rejects it out of hand. The reason is that if one of the parties suggests it, then it must mean it’s bad for the other side. This is how it goes: “Kinzinsky, we’ve decided to disband NATO, withdraw all American troops from Europe, and depend on the good will of the Soviets to remain within their own borders.” “This is the most ridiculous proposal you have suggested so far, Downey. How can we verify how many troops are facing us without NATO? Suppose I told you that my government has instructed me to tell you that we are willing to tear up the Warsaw Pact alliance, and let the Soviet satellites fend for themselves?” “Threats will get you nowhere, Kizins- ky. Do you think we would accept the breaking up of the Warsaw Pact military infrastructure for one moment? Our en tire defense strategy is based on its exist ence. But I’ll tell you what we will do. We’ll do. We’ll dismantle all our ICBMs and turn them into plowshares at no cost to you.” “I’m trying to keep my temper, Dow ney, but if you think my country is going to stand by while you people dismantle your intercontinental missiles, then we might as well adjourn these talks.” “Why do you say that?” “The only reason your side would turn its ICBMs into plowshares is that you’ve developed a plowshare that could do more damage than an ICBM. You know very well we can’t turn our SS-20 missiles into plowshares.” “All right, we’re willing to give up the plowshare idea. What if we canceled our B-l bomber program? Would you accept that?” “Yes, but we didn’t thinkvojj agree to our proposal. Onceyotl it we realized it was a bad idea? that you want to put a bombel range means it’s a much better pi»jP luut we thought. Did you tell the KrcBKn are willing to back off of the re p ( Purk nmcrriim?” oif,,riQ “Of course we would not accept it. We have spent 200 million rubles developing a defense against it. Put something on the table that will at least make some sense.” “Your side hasn’t put anything on the table that makes sense to us.” “What about our agreement to remove all our Backfire bombers out of range of Western Europe?” “Washington thinks the idea stinks. We never thought the Backfire bomber was much of a threat to begin with.” “But you were the ones who brought up the Backfire bomber in the first pla< lace. Pack program?" allbfl'9 “1 did, Downey, and they xilents me to tell you if you give up Dei )me thii a viable weapon, they will cance .pry of purchases from the United St 'of” 1 e . ac “Why would they do tlwt, ' n thought the Soviets were scare® 1 * a " the MX Dense Pack system.” “They were until you offcrel j| c i r ivj build it. Listen to me, Downey Ijotor ve to play disarmament you hai fpou rec chips. It’s obvious every chipfivfer’s 1 offered so far is something ccqpant need to threaten us.” itelding “You haven’t come up withiB of substance yourself.” H. ■ “What would you say ifltolcfc^"'/ will put every one of our m )r t h e c marines in mothballs, and leu® the ones you have now?” "Get off it, Kizinsky. If you serious about the arms race something solid 1 can take Washington.” m; bill or a nomination and prevent if from coming up for consideration. A third recommendation calls for a “total reform of the filibuster rules.” Any one of these changes recom mended by Pryor — exlcuding several others he made — could bring some order to the Senate. But change — any change — is painful for the Senate and far from easy to put into effect. The House, on the other hand, has already instituted a partial limitation on non-germane amendments. But unless the Senate does the same, it will have little impact. To show just how slowly change comes to the Senate, take the example of efforts to televise proceedings — an idea pushed by both party leaders and backed by a majority of the members. But Sen. Russell Long of Louisiana does not like the idea. Long made it abundantly clear that efforts to bypass his opposition would mean trouble for the Senate — in the form of dreaded delay. Altlioi asoline very gal )me loc; ly that cl lean th te pind The ■d b K, 16 oil ref [o rei n a ews ani of [is sa resent ie re fin ind it di .ion t< dlle: wrier R lift is the liler. If to bin ill pass imers. i'asoline irder o r st; Letters: Campus security profile Editor: Well, once again the campus police has demonstrated its effectiveness at pro tecting society from that most heinous of crimes ... PARKING VIOLATIONS. Of course a few attempted rapes and a stab bing managed to slip by, but, at least, we know that our streets are safe for the staff and alumni to park on. At first glance it would appear that there is a serious neglect of student safe ty. But, of course, the students aren’t im portant anyway. At least this seems to be the prevailing opinion of Texas A&M’s administration and and financial back ers. Who needs students; we’ve got a football coach. In all sincerity, security problems will exist even with the most extensive safe guards. However, it would seem logical to place an officer to patrol the parking and dorms of the commons since the last three attacks have taken place there. This patrol would preferably be made on foot and should only worry about protecting the students and not their “quota” of tickets. I don’t really expect this to happen but, maybe, the new head of the depart ment might be a little open-minded and remember that police are here to protect and serve. victories of any coach. BIG DEAL! He’s been coaching longer than any other. Of Guy Lewis at Houston is third in the country in total victories, but only his last five or six years have counted in his SWC total. ;Cou ay lor ■ udents Movie blues i"8<te’ one H Editor: Shelby has been coaching for 20 years. He’s still in search of his 200th SWC vic tory. He now averages less than nine a year. to its full Shelby’s teams historically and some times hysterically lacked discipline. Who can forget the time Mike Thomas stormed off the court and into the locker room. All this because his coach, Shelby, took him out of the game. Boo Hoo! Did Shelby take any action? H-NO. He started the very next game. One thing about Shelby, his is consis tent. Consistently mediocre. He consis tently gets Texas’ and the nation’s best players (i.e. Rudy Woods) but consistent ly finds himself without a bye in the SWC post-season tourney. I don’t know who is in charged duling the movies shown on cat! “Aggie Cinema.” I do know than*' condemned Neil Diamond’s Singer” to Rudder Theater, ins running it where it could be si most of all heard, (namely Rudder Auditorium) ll)l6y ees son should be forced to listen dy or co stereo albums on their kid sister’s Rents, hi-fi record player. The effect# much the same. Showing “The Jazz Singer”inil' Theater is like watching “E.T."# back to the screen. Those of us* 1 gerly went out into the rainandc' Wednesday night in order to be* to Neil Diamond’s fantastic n# greatly disappointed at the shown to this extremely 61# film. Michael Lane Aston Hall This year we are in luck. SWC officials have voted to institute a 45 second shot clock. Great! This should keep Shelby from going into his unique version of the four corners. The four corners offense is terrific but can only be ran properly by the most disciplined players. Something A&M seems to lack. Laura L f Veterinary A"* Checkbook lot# Editor: Coaching situation Editor: Who does Shelby Metcalf know and why is he still head basketball coach here? Let’s look at the record. First, Shelby’s claim to fame — most SWC conference No need to hear cries of “Bring back David Goff,” or “We need David Britton or Vernon Smith.” Just put it simply to Jackie Sherrill, “Dump Shelby.” As far as a replacement goes, there is one clear and obvious choice — ABE LEMMONS. This is a letter of thanks to theg 11 found my checkbook in the road* Northgate. It must have fallenou 1 jacket pocket as I dodged carswh* sing University Drive, but I didn'; it was gone for a couple of hours that I had been here when you cal' 1 that you had left your name, just wanted to say thank you. Hig| Sun Ini Tom Dobrez ’83 Mike Shipl