Viewpoint The Battalion Texas A&M University , Wednesday April 4, 1979 Reader s Forum Class gift no waste By PAUL A. GULIG I appreciate Mr. Pendleton’s concern for the decision of the Class ’80 to give a statue of E. King Gill to the university. However, I do not believe that his statements deserve to be placed in a column labeled “Reflections,” for they surely do not reflect any serious, objective thought. In the first place, the gift is more than a statue being thrown into a field like so many other ones haphazardly placed in the university. The gift is being planned with the administration in conjuction with a beautification and relandscpaing of the area between Kyle Field and Joe Routt Street. The statue will blend into the surrounding scenery to add aesthetic value and spirit to the atmosphere. I agree that many gifts do not seem to have been planned very well — that is why the class of’80 has taken many pains to ensure that its gift will not cause future problems. I agree with Mr. Pendleton that Gill probably would have laughed at the idea of having a statue made to honor him. After all, how was he to know that his action on Jan. 1, 1922 would spark a tradition and spirit at Texas A&M that would give this scliool national, it not international, tame. Just this year other schools copied our Twelfth Man tradition. I believe that a man who has contributed as much to the making of this school as Gill deserves to be honored. If Mr. Pendleton still cannot see past his limited views to allow gifts to be given that are only “useful” perhaps he should consider this. There is a feeling among some university officials and former students that this campus is lacking in both display and support of the arts. I believe that a good statue, if properly planned and constructed, can greatly add to the artistic and cultural atmosphere of the campus. If Mr. Pendleton is narrow-minded enough to believe that art and culture are useless, then I feel sorry for him. If Mr. Pendleton insists on usefulness, about one-fourth of the cost of the project will be used to place two sidewalks over existing pathways worn through the grass. I prefer not to answer Mr. Pendleton’s charges that the class is giving the statue only to show the University “what good Ags the class members are. ” If he truly believes what he said (it surely made a good sensational accusation) then I can only look down upon him for the darkness and mistrust he finds in his heart. Paul A. Gulig is a junior at Texas Ab-M and gift committee chairman for the Class of 80. Consider your choices Jewish nation real issue Signs, leaflets and more signs. It looks like a minature billboard convention. Classic spring election time at A&M. This week students are bombarded with slogans, speeches and told every possi ble reason why they should vote for someone most have never met. The elections are one big bore to some Texas A&M students. And because they probably don’t personally know all the candidates, it takes a little effort to find out something about them. But campus elections deserve a second look ,— they may affect you more than you believe. The students who are elected may vote next year to change where you get to park your car, sit at football games or if there’ll be an intra-campus shuttle to your west campus classes. They go to meetings with the Texas A&M president, are asked to speak on student opinion, and meet with visiting politicians. Each spring, they decide how your $35 or so in student service fees should be distributed. Yell leaders’ actions on the field can embarrass Texas A&M and bring it shame. Or bring it pride. The same holds true for the other campus races. Students owe it to themselves to take a look at who these candidates really are — whether they represent the leaders this student body needs. If you want to complain later, prepare to vote now. K. T . By ROBERT S. WHITE Fetters to the Editor Parking ills? Don’t drive Editor: This is in reference to the letter about the parking sticker dilemma. There is a simple solution to this problem as well as the problems of the shuttle bus system, traffic, and the towing away of unau thorized parked cars. The solution — close the campus. This will be a shock to those persons who love to drive on campus just to stop every 25 yards and those at the university who try to make everywhere on campus convenient to everyone. Also this proposal will probably infuriate the University police department because of the loss in revenue from selling parking stickers. I just wonder how many parking stickers are bought each semester that are not used or- very rarely used? Only those who could show justification as to the necessity of their parking on campus would be issued a parking permit. If someone could show this justification, they would be issued a permit to enter at a certain gate and exit at the same gate. Since only those who had a permit to get on campus could get on campus. Everyone else would have to walk, ride a bicycle, or ride the shuttle bus. The revenue from the sale of shuttle bus passes could finance a more dependable and efficient shuttle bus system on cam pus. Those who ride bicycles or walk could do so without the fear of being run over. Also since only those persons with permits could even get on campus, there would be no need to tow away any cars. (Since de mand for wreckers will decrease there will be no justification for their price in creases). Of course, those who are not on a shut tle bus route could drive to campus but would park in the now undesirable parking lots (those lots located acrss Wellborn Road and on the outskirts of the campus). Dependable, efficient shuttle buses would pick them up and take them to campus. This is a problem that is more serious than just being inconvenienced to get to class or to work. It is a national problem. Before the 1970s this country could afford to drive right up to their offices or classes, but now we can’t. Someone must start conservation. I would hope that the administrators, fac ulty, staff and students of this institution of higher education would recognize the problem and have enough sense to do something about it. —Mary B. Stroud, 81 Staff of Veterinary Public Health talion, March 28) or if he merely chooses to disregard or distort the facts in order to sway public opinion. The problems in the Middle East are not simple and claiming that the fault lies entirely with Israel is absurd. Wasn’t it the Arabs who rejected the U.S. proposal for a Palestinian homeland in 1947 and started the war? Wasn’t it the Arabs who attacked Israel in 1947 and created not only the Palesti nian refugee problem but ignored the problem of 800,000 Jewish refugees from the Arab countries? Wasn’t it the Arabs who had control of the disputed West Bank and all its people for nearly 20 years (1947-67) and did not give their brothers any autonomy? Doesn’t Mr. Qawasmi realize that Pres ident Sadat has at last offered an alterna tive to fruitless propaganda battles and de structive wars? The time has come to re solve differences, make peace, and get on with the job of making life better for everyone in the Middle East. Can anyone look at himself in the mirror and truly say that it is right to back Arafat and “cut off the hands” of those who wish to put an end to the senseless bloodshed? It is time for all responsible people in the area to have the courage to sit together and work towards peace. —Yehuda Dror The “Readers Forum” article, “Palestinians’ Rights” by Qussama H. Qawasmi, supposedly provided a basis for the Arabs to not accept the Camp David peace agreement. But I find it necessary to throw more light on the documented facts about the conflict referred to and point out the one-sided half-truths which some people have tried to pass off as the complete truth. Mr. Qawasmi would have the reader believe that the central issue in the Middle East crisis to be the issue of Palestinian national rights. He refers to the expulsion of “an indigenous Arab population” by the Jewish immigrants through the use of “Israeli terrorism, sporadic invasions, and forcible piecemeal annexa tions.” The real issue confronting the various factions, is the refusal of the Arab world to accept the creation of a small Jewish state in their midst, by the descendants of an indigenous Jewish population, exiled from Palestine nearly 2,000 years ago by the Romans. Arabs were not expelled from Israel but rather left of their’own volitioft, with the encouragement of the Arab High Committee for Palestine. Emil Ghoury, secretary of that organization noted in 1948, “The fact that ther are these refugees is the direct consequence of the action of the Arab states in opposing partition and the Jewish state. The Arab states agreed upon this policy unanimously and they must share in the solution of the problem.” The Arabs left their homes to make way for invading Arab armies whose coun tries’ territory formed no part of Palestine in 1948. If Qawasmi still begrudges the space for the Israeli nation, what does he propose to do with the 750,000 Jews absorbed by Israel after their expulsion from Arab countries? Compare this figure to the 420,000 Arabs who actually left Palestine voluntarily in 1948. As for the charge of Israeli “terrorism,” I will let the massacre of Olympic athletes, the bombing of open market places, and the death of Israeli school children clue the reader in as to who the real terrorists are. Now for the questions of so-called Palestinian national rights. (1) There has never been an Arab state called Palestine nor has there ever been an Arab nation ruled from a ctiy in Palestine. (2) The West Bank and the Gaza Strip were under Arab control from 1948 to 1967, more than enough time to establish a Palestinian state. (3) With the exception of the recent peace neogitaitons between Egypt and Israel, which resulted in the signing of a peace accord last week, no Arab has entered into any form of peaceful negotiations with the Israelis. Violence has always been the Arabs’ tool. The Palestine Liberation Organiza tion is nothing more than an Arab terrorist organization bent on spreading their death and destruction worldwide — re recent statements by Yasser Arafat of spreading his “war” to the U.S. The Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty, contrary to what Qawasmi writes, does call for further peaceful negotiations to reach a compromise solution to the Palestinian confict. In the study of history it would seem, however, that the Palestinians do not believe in compromise. It would be impossible in this space to discuss all the aspects of the Palestinian issue confronting Israel and the Arab nations. For those readers who wish to verify my facts, I suggest the following sources: “Who Stands Accused” by Chaim Her zog, “Battleground by Samuel Katz, and “Whose Land?” by James Parkes. Robert S. White is a senior history major and president of the Texas A&M Hillel Club. Fetters to the Editor The Battalion welcomes letters to the editor on any subject. However, to be acceptable for publication these letters must meet certain criteria. They should: V Not exceed 300 words or 1800 char acters in length. V Be neatly typed whenever possible. Hand-written letters are acceptable. >f Include the author’s name, address and telephone number for verification. Letters to the editor are printed as a ser vice to our readers. Publication of a lettei is never guaranteed. The editorial staff reserves the right to edit letters to remove grammatical errors and to avoid litigation. Address letters to the editor to: Arabs not blameless Editor: I don’t know if Mr. Qawasmi really be lieves the propaganda he has regurgitated in his comments on the Middle East (Bat- A&-M CorvsoUdateci ScWool Iioar . .Karen Rogen. Patterson, Sean Petty, ^ Blake, Dillard Stone, RoyN Lyle Lovett, Keith Taylor Cartoonist Doug Gi^ Photo Editor Lee Roy Leschp Photographer Lynn 8^ Focus section editor Gary Opinions expressed in The Battalion are those of the editor or of the writer of the article and are not necessarily those of the University administration or the Board of per hii Regents. The Battalion is a non-profit supporting enterprise operated by st«^ as a university and community new Editorial policy is determined by the