Viewpoint The Battalion Thursday Texas A&M University March 9, 1978 Maximized benefits I was fortunate enough to take part in a. student editors conference at the White House last weekend which culminated in a half-hour question and answer session with President Carter. The experience was interesting enough, but as expected nothing of earth-shattering importance was re leased. Carter knew better than to give college editors first shot at any hot news — the wrath of the White House press corps is legendary. Strangley enough, it was from an assistant secretary of Health, Education and Welfare that I learned some interesting news. Mary Francis Berry, head of the educational branch of HEW, told the conference that substantial increases in federal student aid for public and private colleges were in the works to help students combat rising educational costs. She said, however, that no move has been made to help institutions battle increasing operating costs. It makes one wonder how much good will result from increasing student aid benefits when at the same time college costs continue to rise. Since most institutional funding comes from the state level, it might be a splendid idea for the Texas Legislature to work along the same lines as the federal govern ment. Perhaps then students could do more than just keep their heads above water. /.A. Affirmative Action overkill By LILLI DOLLINGER Have you ever wondered what it would feel like to be told you couldn’t enter a certain school or get a job because of your sex or the color of your skin? Think about it. If you are white, and especially if you are male, it’s more possible than you may think. Our government has decided that past discrimination of minorities warrants “affirmative action.” This action includes forcing businesses and schools to set aside a certain number of openings for minorities: qualified or not-so-qualified. This reverses the situation of whites and minorities. As a matter of fact, this action is like curing a drought with a downpour. This drought is gone, but now we have a flood. Case in point: Allan Bakke is suing the University of California at Davis Medical School for discrimination. He is white and is more qualified than the 16 minority stu dents selected before him. Out of a total of 3,737 applicants, 100 were accepted, but 16 of those positions were set aside for minority students under a “minority ad missions program.” This program is a nice way of establishing a quota. Of course, very few people would support quotas, so the government calls them Affirmative Ac tion Plans. Reader s Forum The Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution guarantees equal protection under the law for all, regardless of color (or sex). Past cases have determined that ra cial classifications and discriminations violate this clause. The advocates of Affirmative Action claim that past racism justifies reverse dis crimination. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a forerunner of the current quota pro grams. Those who were so vocal in the 1960s about racial discrimination against blacks do not seem to be so worried about unjust discrimination today. Think about the absurdity of ending discrimination by discriminating. Affirmative Action may be a burden to the majority but let’s look at from the minority’s viewpoint, also. First of all, the minority student or employee that is ac cepted or employed merely because of race is at a disadvantage. Why encourage a person falsely about his or her abilities or background preparation? A study of spe cially admitted black and Chicano law school graduates in more than a dozen states indicated that roughly 60 percent or more could not pass the bar exam. What was accomplished by this affirmative ac tion. Let s also think about the qualified minority students, those who would have no trouble gaining admittance to a profes sional school because of their abilities. The stigma attached to them because of these quotas is very damaging. They say all too clearly that the minority member just does not have what it takes to make it and must therefore be given what he hasn t the ability to earn. His talent and hard work will hardly be appreciated. This is a sad commentary on the American way of life. The proponents of Affirmative Action believe that the government should prac tice racial and sexual discrimination in order to make businesses and schools rep resentative of society as a whole. This goal is unfit for a free society and should be re-examined by not only our political lead ers, but by each and every citizen that ex pects to be treated according to his abilities and hard work. This country should keep its ideals high in regard to its dealings with its citizens lives. Each one of us has a stake in the Bakke case and the ideal it represents. Let’s hope the Court rules to establish the right of all young people to he judges on their own merits when attempting to secure employment or higher education. Lilli Dollinger is a freshman math major and is secretary-treasurer of Texas A» Cary Italia . Ih ( Dr Clinton \ rhillips. Bchcl Hia Ihmlt* »l Tublicalions: Donah! I Johnson.