The Battalion. (College Station, Tex.) 1893-current, February 23, 1977, Image 2
Page 2 THE BATTALION WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1977 ewe Need beginning language courses e.«> Editor: Because of a change in major I am forced to take one course in a foreign language, Although I had no foreign language in high school, I felt that since I was in a beginning course that my lack of training would not pose a major problem. What a joke. I was put in a beginning German class with students who had as much as three years of German in high school. Admittedly they were in the class for the extra grade points an A in a four hour course can give you. I was left trying to keep up with those who had nothing to learn. signed up for the course to begin with. I was stuck in German. I stuck it out for as long as I could. When my other classes began to suffer I had to drop it. Now I will have to find some small school with real be ginning courses in foreign language. That way I can graduate. Maybe I’m wrong, but it just doesn’t seem right that a university of this size would not have true be ginner courses to offer its students. I guess I expect too much. Paula Chapman, ’78 After tlie first day of class I knew I was in trouble. I checked the schedule and found that Spanish is the only language that has a course for those people with no previous language training. It looked like my salvation. However, I was told by the people in the Modern Language Department that there was no chance of my getting in the class be cause there were too many people Drive defensively Editor: You are approaching the freeway on the access ramp when the car in front of you comes to a complete stop; what happens? Either you crash into the guy in front of you, or you have a close call. Incidents like this are common occurences especially where there is heavy traffic. Much to my dismay, there are thousands of licensed driv- Slouch by Jim Earle wt* 77 pec fi ' 1 “I’VE NEVER THOUGHT OF YOU AS A MUSTACHE- PERSON!” ers who no more deserve that privilege than a first grader. I don’t know how some of these people have escaped major accidents. Luck dr fate whatever the reason, licensed motorists need to be defen sive at all times. When did your grandmother or father first receive her or his license? Ten, twenty, thirty years ago? The question occurred to me whether or not drivers who fall in this category would be able to pass a test on defensive driving tech niques. There are many adults who re- creived their license during a time when cars were few and highway systems were far less complex. Today drivers need to be on the de fensive with respect to the other motorists at all times. I strongly feel a need to require all licensed drivers to take a re fresher course in defensive driving in order to renew his or her license. Also some type of reflex test should be given in conjunction with the course to determine if a driver is able to respond fast enough while on the road. I think the state should fund both of the above. — Margie SantaMaria, ‘79 No faith in equal taxation The Battalion Opinions expressed in The Battalion are thosd of the the use for reproduction of .ill news dispatches cred- < ditor or of the writer of the article and are not neces- jted to it. Rights of reproduction of all other matter sarihj those of the University administration or the herein reserved. Second-Class postage paid at College Board of Regents. The Battalion is a non-profit, self- Station, Texas. support inn enterprise operated by students as a uni- MEMBER ' 1 ' '“y u "‘\ <-°">»‘ u »ily newspaper. Editorial policy is Texas Press Association Southwest Journalism Congress LETTERS POLICY Editor Jerry Needham h ttrr.s to the editor should not exceed 300 words Managing E<#tor James Aitken and are subject to being cut to that length or less ij Assignments Editor Rusty Cawley longer The editorial staff reserves the right to edit Features Editor Lisa Junod letters and does not guarantee to publish any News Edi , wr Debby Krenek letter. Each letter must be signed, show the address of News Assistant Carol Meyer tb. writer and list’ a telephone number for verification P h„ to graphy Director Kevin Venner \dtlress correspondence to Utters to the Editor. S|wrts Editol . p au) Arnett / Battalion. Boom 216, Reed McDonald Building, Copy Kc ij tor Steve Reis College Station. Texas 77343 Reporters George Maselli, Paul Represented nationally by National Educational McGrath, Lynn Rossi, John Tynes, Lee Roy Leschper \ilvertising Services, Inc., New York City, Chicago Jr., Mary Hesalroad, Jan Bailey and la)s Angeles. Asst. Photo Editors Tracie Nordheim, Mail subscriptions are SIR 75 per semester. $33.25 Mike Willy, ,„■! school year, $35.00 per full year All subscriptions Student Publications Board: Bob G. Rogers. Chair- subject to 5% sales tax, Advertising rates furnished on man, Joe Arredondo, Tom Dawsey, Dr. Gary Halter, request Address The Battalion, Room 216, Reed Dr. John W Hanna, Dr. Clinton A. Phillips, Jerri McDonald Building, College Station, Texas 77843. ' Ward. Director of Student Publications: Gael L. United Press International is entitled exclusively to Cooper. Editor: A column in last Tuesday’s Battal ion (Feb. 15) exhibited a couple of characteristics which deserve more attention than they are liable to get. These characteristics concern the progressive nature of the Federal income tax. In her column, Miss Taulman seems to be confused not only about how progressive taxes are but also about how progressive they should be. She asserts that it is “too dif ficult to get rich’’ and in the next breath she complains that “the rich do not pay their share. Granted she also complains that it is “too easy to stay rich perhaps this makes her distinction possible? Even so her complaints seem unlikely since there is no question on the tax form that asks if this is the first year one is rich. Miss Taulman seems to have lost sight of the fact that the Federal income tax is an income tax, not a luxury tax. Her confusion is further demonstrated when she applauds both Carter’s tax revision plan that would increase taxes on the wealthy and his call for elimination of the corporate income tax, a measure that would benefit mostly wealthy people. Readers" forum Guest viewpoints, in addi tion to Letters to the Editor, are welcome. All pieces sub mitted to Readers’ forum should be; • Typed triple space • Limited to 60 characters per line • Limited to 100 lines Submit articles to Reed McDonald 217, College Sta tion, Texas, 77843. Author’s name and phone number must accompany all submissions. Texas A&M University DIRECTORY $2.50 Available at Student Publications Office 216 Reed McDonald Bldg. Texas A&M Bookstore University Bookstore In spite of her course reversals it does seem that she favors a more progressive tax, that is one that falls heaviest on the wealthy. But is it fair that one man should pay half his income in taxes while another pays only (sic.) a third. This is the situa tion in America today (mostly in re gressive state and local taxes) and the rich pay half of theirs (mostly in Federal income taxes). It is ques tions such as these that have been constantly ignored in the debate of taxation. I challenge Miss Taulman to examine them. In short it seems that Miss Taul man has a great deal of knowledge about taxes but that she has done very little thinking about them. I contend that some thought on her part would have eliminated both her confusion and her starry-eyed faith in equal taxation. — H. Ed Mendieta ’80 Cl By .ijustbt i citizen 1 ro to the rty minut lie car an t can hap iefO.L. I ■m ice. ‘A burglai tter of 60 icy just tl idow and ieveral B.s) have Texas d nber of ( decreas Carter’s reorganization plans should consider current strengths, interests! By BA1 [if you ne (Dm those ( kht want pent Cei lilary Bli i shop tb ning to teel. She Blake, liry scienc WASHINGTON — Reorganiza tion of government is the buzz-word in Washington this winter. It was a major theme of President Carter’s campaign and it is a high-priority item in his legislative agenda for the new year. The first skirmish in the reorgani zation war has now been fought in the Senate. The result, as James P. Gannon forecast in the Wall Street Journal last December, does “give an early indication of whether the pervasive campaign rhetoric of 1976 about streamlining the government can be translated into political reality in 1977 over the protests of those with a stake in the status quo.” The answer is not as discouraging as skeptics would have you think. It indicates that substantial prog ress can be made in Carter’s type of comprehensive reform, but only if there is a good deal of awareness of the power realities and personality factors that lie behind an organiza tion chart. The Senate reorganization effort, headed by Sen. Adlai E. Stevenson III, D-lll., had as its purpose rationalizing the jurisdiction of Sen ate committees and reducing the overlapping and competing time demands on individual senators. It was aimed, as Stevenson said early in the process, at a situation in which senators were neither generalists nor specialists but “com- partmentalists.” We have sliced out daily routines into superficial fragments, and we have divided and subdivided large problems into a host of committee cubbyholes,” he said last year. “It is no wonder that there is little consis tency or coherence to what we do here.” The plan adopted by the Senate earlier this month does not guaran tee “consistency or coherence” in the future. It does not go as far as Stevenson recommended. But it does reduce the number of Senate committees by one-fifth, the number of subcommittee assign ments for the average senator by one-third, and the number of chair manships some senior members ac cumulated by one-half. It broadens the jurisdiction of sur viving legislative units. And, as polit ical scientist Norman Ornstein, a member of the Stevenson commit tee staff, noted, it introduces into the Senate rules and committee descrip tions, for the first time, such con- David S. Broder IK; search, environmental protection, international economic policy, con sumer protection, government in formation, intergovernmental rela tions, revenue-sharing” — all of which were afterthoughts or appen dages previously. The greatest single success of the Stevenson effort was combining the energy issues, which had been scat tered among seven different com mittees, in a new Committee on Energy and Natural Resoiurces. That committee is the old Senate Interior Committee, headed by Sen. Henry M. Jackson, D-Wash., one of the true Senate powerhouses. No such similar consolidation of energy jurisdictioni has been possible in the House; its Interior Committee has had three different chairmen in the last five years. There is an obvious implication for the President, who is now weighing his own proposal for consolidation of energy functions in the executive branch. The message is to go with strength — not against it. Yet Carter, from all reports is con sidering doing exactly the opposite — removing the energy functions from the powerful Interior Depart ment and building his new energy agency around a relative bureaucra tic lightweight, the Federal Energy Administration. It has had the same kind of leadership turnover that the House Interior Committee has seen. The important lesson from the Se nate experience is that there are cer tain jurisdictions where the internal rivalries and interest group pres sures are so strong that they almost defy rational reorgainzation. A prac tical President would be wary, in deed, of blundering into those areas. One is transportation. Just as Lyndon Johnson had to settle for a Transportation Department which omitted the maritime industry, so Stevenson’s efforts to create fied Transportation Committee the Senate were frustrated by interests of road-builders, n men and others. Carter could also learn Stevenson’s experience tobewani the veterans and the elderly Mon to abolish the special-interest mittees dedicated to those stituencies were shot down inf! — and very nearly upset thewl plan. The President might member that history, when planner tells him the Veterans ministration really ought tobei] of a Human Resources Depi or that there’s no reason for rate Administration on Aging. But even with these caul there is reason for Carter to heart from Stevenson’s experif “If I had been wiser at thebi and perceived all of those thick Stevenson said at the end struggle, “I might not haveg( into so many of them. . .. is very satisfying to have left with my colleagues, on this durable institution. (c)1977. The Washington Post [“You get Vt stay i jsb the sh le Te shop 75 under pgrammii cepts as transportation, energy re- SCANLIN’S LAUNDRY & CLEANERS (New Owners - Bill & Alice Beene) Specializing in DRESSMAKING — ALTERATIONS — REPAIRS Open; 7:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. — 7 Days a Week Attendant On Duty: 7:00 to 6:00 P.M. (Except Sun.) SELF SERVICE LAUNDRY & DRYCLEANING or FULL FAMILY SERVICE (WASH, DRY & FOLD) 708 N. Rosemary 846-9823 LAKEViEW CLUB Mansel’Smleni £ • Strobe Light Wheel Alignment • Front End Wheel Alignment Wheel Alignment For Foreign & American-Made Cars Brake Service 300 W. 25th St. BRYAN 822-2089 779-4862 8-12 WANTED 1 U Hey, in larijuana pparentl na har [Agents pent Adn pms Tue bd true bunds o |an $5 n tsted bu veillan liming fr nde. The S |uare r > forn from 3 Miles N. on Tabor Road Saturday Night: Roy Robbins and the Availables From 9 a.m. ____ _ yfAMPEDTDANCE' Every Tuesday and Thursday Nights Ladies $1.00 Men $2.0 All Brands, Cold Beer 40 Cents A “Dandy Don” Alias Donny WUliams has been a member of the 3C Gang nearly two years. Don’t let his fool you — a ruthless character. Dandy Don is now a student at Texas A&M. 3C BBQ Across The Tracks Nearly Downtown Bryan