)5
licro-
1 his
3U to
2 lyr-
hout
:hout
'eath
snce
test
rou-
rable
t ask
-- -'S, ItK,
OR
V54F
REFRESHING
COKES*
HURRY
PICK UP YOUR FREE CARD NOW
NO OBLIGATION
0 SIMPLE TO PLAY
Prices Good Thur. - Fri. - Sat.
January 18-19-20.
-Quantity Right Reserved-
LUCKY
Rosedale
PEAS
No. 303
Cans
Libby’s—Vienna
SAUSAGE
5
4-Oz.
Cans
Libby’s—Tomato
JUICE
Libby’s—Gold Cream Style or Whole Kernel
3 4 Cans $1 COR N 5
No. 303
Cans
Libby’s—Sliced or Halves, Yellow Clinjf
PEACHES
Q No. 2 l /2
Libby’s—Cut
Cans
89c GREEN BEANS
5
No. 303
Cans
Del Monte
A BTL
O CTN.
(Plus Deposit)
Parkay
Limit 2 Cartons With $5.0.0
or More Purchase
Excluding Beer
CATSUP 4
14-Oz.
Btls
Libby’s—Buttered
LIMA BEANS 4
Libby’s—Buttered
SWEET PEAS . 4
No. 2
Cans
No. 2
Cans
Libby's—Sliced
BEETS
Libby’s
CUT BEETS
No. 303
Cans
No. 303
Cans
.$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
Libby’s Buttered
CARROTS 4
No. 2
Cans
Libby’s
SAUER KRAUT
3
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
Libby’s—Fruit
COCKTAIL 4
No. 303
Cans
Libby’s—Mixed
VEGETABLES
r No. 303 djl
.3 Cans «pl
Libby’s
Libby’s—Pork or Beef
SLOPPY JOE ,,0,596
LB.
PKG.
OLEO
Kraft—Soft Diet
PARKAY OLEO 2
Half Horn
CHEESE
Aqua-Net — Reg. 79^
Kraft
10-Oz. |b
Hair Spray 59
CORN BEEF HASH ,,,„39c
Betty Crocker
FROSTING MIX 3 >, r
ROYAL SCOT
I OLEO
ii?
Mm (Solids) JwBmkUI
^ ^lllllllllllllllllllllllHnillllllllllll!llll!l||!|||i||||||||||||||llllllimill||||||||||||||||||| U |„ l i|, ll || | ||| l|| |, | ||| | || | ||||| l||| j |i | |l|l| | | || | | l | l | ||| ||„ |mi 3
Tender Touch
BATH OIL .. S$J.«9
Shurfine—Crinkle Cut, Frozen
POTATOES
2 B, b e 39c
Style—Reg. or Hard Holding
SETTING GEL
S83c
Food King—Frozen
STRAWBERRIES
yl 10-OZ. d»-|
Pkgs.^l
Booth—1-Lb.
TOOTHPASTE 'Z69c BREADED SHRIMP $1.09
SILVER SPUR—SLICED
TEXAS JUICY
ORANGES 5 49
FRANKS-45' BACON.... u. 5 3
12-Oz.
__ Pkg.
Boston Butt Style i •
PORK ROAST
PORK STEAK „ 55c J ^FAMILY PACK ^
Baby Beef
ROUND STEAK , ,85c
79c
Ground
ROUND Lb .89c
Hormel
LITTLE SIZZLERS ,2 ,t,59c
Select
Baby Beef—Rump or
PIKES PEAK ROAST
“ Oysters ^ 89
U.S.D.A.—Grade ‘A’ Whole
G
FRYERS
PORK
CHOPS
%
Bananas %
Mellow
Sweet
FRESH DRESSED
W
First Cuts . . . Lb. 55c
Center Cut Ribs Lb. 75c
29' 'Ns***#
Washington State—Red Delicious
APPLES 2 49c
California—Sunkist
LEMONS 6 F „ r 39c
Purple Top
TURNIPS 2 Lb, 29c
Florida
KENTUCKY BEANS ,b l9c
Yellow
ONIONS 3 u..29c
SPARE RIBS
Fresh
Medium
Size
A. F. MILK
65*
COUPON WORTn
M s°tS
WITH THE PURCHASE
OF $10.00 OR MORE
EXCLUDING CIGARETTES
AND BEER
ORR’S SUPER MKT.
COUPON EXPIRES
JANUARY 20, 1968
2SSS LOW PRICES
m
GREEN
STAMPS
GREEN
STAMPS
I
^‘()3est *3n 'if«/
iij:
2 Convenient
Locations
• Downtown
200 E. 24th St.
•Ridgeerest /
oRirs
Ii:::
THE BATTALION
College Station, Texas
Thursday, January 18, 1968 Page 3
SOUND OFF
(Continued From Page 2)
caught in a traffic flow which
took us right in front of their
“athletic” dorm. The traffic
stopped us right in front, and a
mob of 200-300 sips started to
yell and finally started towards
us. I tried to pull out and pass
the traffic in front of me, but my
car stalled. Before we could get
out of there they had managed
to kick several dents in the side
of my car.
This shows the great teasip,
especially their athletes, in their
finest colors. These brave, bold,
and mean teasips had to have the
advantage by such a great degree
it was really unreal. Any attempt
to defend yourself would have
been instant suicide. Maybe the
SWC Officials ought to change
the football rules allowing t.u. to
play 22 “athletes” so the odds
will be right and they might have
a chance of winning.
Robert B. Mason ’70
Editor,
The Battalion:
This is in regard to the with
drawal of Civilian Student Coun
cil support of the university’s
clothing regulations at its meet
ing last Thursday.
I received the impression that
these rules are opposed by many
people “because they are so point
less without enforcement.” This
seems, to me, an unusual and
questionable motive for repealing
a rule or law. How many laws
would be repealed, and what
would be the resultant state of
the union, if the U. S. Govern
ment operated on the policy of
repealing laws just because they
are not sufficiently enforced?
Surely something can be done
about increasing enforcement if
the authorities can see that this
is what is sincerely wanted.
Concerning the beautiful and
theoretical ideal that “w*e should
not be judged by the clothes we
wear,” I can only say that, un
fortunately, we are, whether we
like it or not. Certainly A&M
would fall down in the estimation
of many people if our students
were allowed to look as sloppy as
some of the students at the
“cookie pusher” schools, even if
we assumed that we here at A&M
did not judge a person on that
basis.
Roger H. Fry ’69
Editor,
The Battalion
In answer to Mr. Hoy, who felt
that Texas A&M is a “different”
school, and that if we Aggies
want freedom of conduct and
dress we should go to another in
stitution, I give a hearty “horse
laugh.”
Some of us refuse to abandon
what we feel is a superior aca
demic education at Texas A&M
for the fields of Elysium at an
other university; since we have
decided to stay at the university
of our choice, our next decision
to make is whether we are going
to be content to live our lives
under the preestablished Univer
sity Regulations, or shall we take
a part in forming the new guide
lines for our conduct? We are
the Aggies of today, and as such
we should mold the policies that
we believe are best for us in 1968
instead of leaving them as our
predecessors felt was right for
their class in 1896, 1920, and even
in 1951, which produced such an
illustrious graduate as Mr. Hoy.
Texas A&M has meant some
thing in the past! let’s make it
mean something in the future.
We can make this a great univer
sity in the same way that our
forefathers made this a great na
tion: by preserving individual
freedoms, even the freedom to
choose what to wear.
Richard Montgomery ’69
Editor,
The Battalion:
I recently had some discourag
ing information related to me
concerning the makeup of the Ci
vilian Student Council. I was in
formed that three voting members
of the council were also members
of the Cadet Corps. I readily un
derstand the purpose of having a
member of the Corps as a spokes
man at the council meetings, but
I cannot fathom the reasoning
behind the giving of a vote to
this spokesman.
If a non-elected Corps member
has a vote, why not give all non-
elected civilians that attended the
meetings a vote, after all the
council is for the civilians not for
the corps. Even though I agree
that the Corps should have a
spokesman at the meetings, I
don’t understand why there is a
cadet representing the civilians in
Dorm 15 and a cadet representing
the civilians in a portion of the
University apartment complex. If
we are to have a “Civilian Stu
dent” Council, why can’t we have
a council that is composed of ci
vilians who were elected by
civilians, since the council sup
posedly is the voice of the ci
vilians.
William V. Stephens ’70