■WEDNESDAY, JUNE 25, 1941 Page 2- THE BATTALION The Battalion ■» STUDENT SUMMER-WEEKLY NEWSPAPER OF TEXAS A. & M. COLLEGE The Battalion, official newspaper of the Agricultural and Mechanical College of Texas and the City of College Station, is published three times weekly from September to June, is sued Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday mornings; and is pub lished weekly from June through August. Entered as second-class matter at the Post Office at College Station, Texas, under the Act of Congress of March 3, 1879. Subscription rate, $.50 the summer session. Advertising rates upon request. Represented nationall Inc,, at New York City, San Francisco. y by Chic oy National Advertising Service, Chicago, Boston, Los Angeles, and Office, Room 122, Administration Building. Telephone 4-5444. 1940 Member 1941 Associated GoIle6iate Press V. A. Yentzen ... Orville Allen Jack Decker Mike Haiken ........ Dorothy B. Trant Editor-in-Chief Advertising Manager Managing Editor Sports Editor Sports Assistant Reportorial Staff Laetitia Frances Gofer, Clyde C. Franklin, Ralph W. Stenzel, Alfred Zabludosky, Herbert S. Jacobson, Loraine Devin, Lucille Thornton, Jerrell Cate, Elizabeth McNew, Ben Taylor, T. R. Vannoy, Student Conscription THE GALLUP POLL sponsored by the Coronet Magazine has taken the issue, Should college stu dents be permitted to finish their present college courses before being drafted into the army? as the question for a vote by public opinion in May. A reply of 69 percent for “Yes” and 31 percent for “No” was recorded. A comment on the opinion will appear in the July issue and is quoted in part. “The question of drafting college students is a lively issue not only among the colleges, who face declining enrollments next year if their students are put into the army, but also among draft boards from coast to coast. “The issue, in its simplest terms, is just this— is there any reason why college men should not be granted privileges of exemption not granted to other men of the same age? The public has strong feelings pro and con about this issue. Only one person in seventeen in the survey had no opinion— an unusually small proportion. “The majority of the voters think college boys should be deferred from the draft because they say the country needs college trained men for further leadership, or, as a number of voters in the survey put it: “ ‘We need trained brains as well as trained bodies/ “Other arguments of a similar nature are put forward. Many voters say: ‘They will be more of an asset with a college course. Let them finish college and then go into training. This is a war of brains as well as fighting soldiers.’ “Still others argue that there are enough men to fill the draft without taking, college trained men. “But the people on the other side of the argu ment—the thirty-one percent who oppose special exemption for college boys—have equally strong feelings against what they consider ‘unfair dis crimination.’ “They insist that it isn’t cricket to excuse a man from the draft just because he’s lucky enough to be in college. “Their viewpoint is neatly summarized by one voted in the survey who said: “ ‘Why should there be any discrimination ? College boys aren’t any better than anyone else— plenty of people have to give up good jobs to go into the army. Why shouldn’t the college boys give ■up something too?’ “There are others who believe that college men